Suunto 9 Picasso Edition
-
@freeheeler is this a default mode ?
-
@dimitrios-kanellopoulos
it is the ski touring with customized modifications.Edit: I would think that my baro needs a baby toothbrush treatment again… but then there’s the realistic descent, if I ignore the frequent small “steps” that are most likely at spots where I stopped to wait for my wife and kids
-
@freeheeler but graph is plotted against distance not time, isn’t it?
-
@freeheeler link please suunto app link
-
@dimitrios-kanellopoulos
I PM-ed it to you as an error popped up over and over again when I tried posting it here… -
I noted something interesting, I run weekly 10k in the same place.
The mode of GPS is gps only and in performance mode with last AGPS and 15mins waiting before starting.
As the field is 400m, so normally, every km mark will be the other side of field. (400 * 2,5 = 1km)
So for the figures 2 to 6, you can see the 10km mark(or the red end mark) is close to the green begin mark.
but the first one, the GPS trace is very fine, strangely the 10km marks in 200m farther than where is should be.
My question is, where is these 200m? there is no evidence that GPS takes any shortcut,
how could it be? it means during a section where the GPS saved a speed lower than my actual speed?
-
just my observation,
I did a 10k GPS only(L) and a 5k GPS + Galileo( R) today, I’m still suffering the gps speed lost issue,
I run with an almost constant speed, but during the red box area, the speed dropped a lot (4m/km to 4.46m/km)! so this makes my 8th 9th 10th kms much longer.
So I ran another 5k with GPS + galileo, in the same area, the speed less than GPS only (4 to 4,16).
anyone meets the same problem?
does anyone know the root cause?
how can we avoid this problem?
-
@zhang965
same day? what if you try to repeat that on another day?
maybe the satellite position did not like this direction change on that very spot? -
@freeheeler said in Suunto 9 Picasso Edition:
@zhang965
same day? what if you try to repeat that on another day?
maybe the satellite position did not like this direction change on that very spot?I didn’t think in this way, I will try it next time
thank you a lot -
@zhang965 are you using Stryd or some pod btw?
-
@dimitrios-kanellopoulos said in Suunto 9 Picasso Edition:
@zhang965 are you using Stryd or some pod btw?
nope,
-
@freeheeler said in Suunto 9 Picasso Edition:
@André-Faria
this is from a cycling activity wearing a merino shirt of cigarclothing.
On the spikey HR activity I was running with a plastic shirt from https://www.cigarclothing.co/… same today: plastic shirt and spikey HR graph…
The graphs show good results about the shirt.
-
it’s what i noticed recently:
the GPS reception is not stable.
When I run with a given pace (4;11 m/km), during a section, the pace is dropped suddenly a lot(5;30m/km), but I will get a speed compensation after this section (3;20m/km), if I understand, it’s my S9B recalculate the distance.
normally, the recalculation is OK, it will not lost so much distance on a straight section.
But if I run faster during the section curved where the pace dropped, I’ll lost the distance, as the recalculation of distance is based on two positions. you can see in my screenshots, it looks like a shortcut.
My questions about this problem;
How my GPS reception can be lost during a such long distance (during 300m )? It supposed to be logged every 1s?
How can I check the GPS logging period? How can I check where the GPS reception lost or why it’s lost?
There is the GPS track difference between 2019 2020 2021 in the same place, same configuration
Why the GPS reception is getting worse over time?
Thanks
-
@zhang965 good question. Different times and different available sat?
-
@dimitrios-kanellopoulos said in Suunto 9 Picasso Edition:
@zhang965 good question. Different times and different available sat?
Almost the same time
2019 at 6:23
2020 6;47
2021 7:06It looks I’m getting lazy over years
What is Available Sat?
-
@zhang965 available satellites over your heat.
-
@dimitrios-kanellopoulos said in Suunto 9 Picasso Edition:
@zhang965 available satellites over your heat.
I don’t know, so far, the only thing I can tell, they follow the same steps,
I wear the HR blet, I walk about 30m (so the watch has 30m to connect to GPS) to the park before start the run,
-
Hi all,
Just bringing a quick answer here. On my side, the GPS is wrong almost all the time. On the map I’m always going “through” building or in the lake, on the railways. Ok I’m often starting my run from town, with buildings around but we don’t have skyscrapers here and I’m always waiting the watch is ready before starting. My 9 Baro is configured with GPS+Glonass.
I would say I know where I’m running and there is no need for me to re-check the map after but there is a serious lack or precision here
-
@darxmurf perhaps not related but my track is always wrong on the graphic map but fairly good on the real satellite map. But it had almost more or less been wrong. The last days it has been better and the only thing I changed is that I use a Polar H9 instead of a Polar OH1.
-
The SUNTO 9/Baro GPS is not so bad …
For the fun of it, I created a personalized “Motorsport” mooing the lawn view for when I’m cutting my garden grass …
I was impressed by the result (not the garden
… but the capture of information …
It is not a 400 m stadium … still I’m almost able to see that I went everywhere … just one time I entered in the house with the mower
