Suunto 9 baro very low elevation gain vs other brands
- 
 @fazel 
 it could be possible that I’ve had a similar “setup” like @stromdiddily had recently during his run. Lot of wet stuff and the sensor holes just on top of the jackets cuff.
 When zooming in the graph I can see tiny spikes… maybe I should entertain myself tonight and count all the irregular deltas 
 The last couple of ski tours gave a more reasonable result. I’m not sure if it’s this. But what I actually wanted to point out is that I have the impression that S9B is not calculating way to low.
- 
 @fazel 
 this graph is from a hike with poles. Hence similar movement like ski touring. When I zoom in the graph is impressively less noisy. It was a dry and sunny day. I assume that raindrops and hence molten snowflakes in combo with a garment can influence the recording.
 I did not check the total ascent as this activity has more ups and downs plus a bike ride at the beginning and the end (and a pause for getting wet shirt changed). But just the fact that the graph has less noise is interesting, at least for me 
  
- 
 @freeheeler yes - your analysis seems good. 
- 
 Today I experienced something similar to @freeheeler. I went running outside and it was snowing (first snow in a long while in Amsterdam!), and got 47/49 (ascent/descent) on a route where I usually get ~10 meters. Corrected elevation seems something like 12/13 (I did play a little bit with Runalyze). The common pattern seems to be rain/snow. First time this happen to me. Also, when I got home the altitude on the watch kept changing rapidly (-3 when I stopped the exercise, 0 when I arrived home, then -2 a minute later, +2 next time I checked, and so on). Currently the watch is taking a warm bath to calm down  
- 
 @isazi said in Suunto 9 baro very low elevation gain vs other brands: the watch is taking a warm bath you have to treat nicely what you love  
- 
 Hi again, 
 Sorry, but I’m still annoyed by this issue.
 Both S9B and A3P on handle bar, recorded exactly the same ride: S9B recorded 539m elevation gain and A3P recorded 641m.
 How could it be? 
- 
 @oktan said in Suunto 9 baro very low elevation gain vs other brands: Hi again, 
 Sorry, but I’m still annoyed by this issue.
 Both S9B and A3P on handle bar, recorded exactly the same ride: S9B recorded 539m elevation gain and A3P recorded 641m.
 How could it be? both calibrated at the begining of the activity? 
- 
 @andré-faria Yes. 
- 
 @oktan link. Please so I can compare. 
- 
 @oktan 
 I would bet on wind effect on S9B and lateral holes.If confirmed by Dimitrios, try protecting holes with something like this  
  
- 
 @mff73 nah then the s9 would have had more. I suspect the opposite 
- 
 @dimitrios-kanellopoulos 
 Oh yes, I misread it.
- 
 @mff73 We have people in Jerusalem with similar hats. I will borrow one   
- 
 
- 
 @dimitrios-kanellopoulos I have only to Sports Tracker. Is that OK? S9B: 
 https://www.sports-tracker.com/workout/meiroktan/606aa65b61acdf1859398452A3P: 
 https://www.sports-tracker.com/workout/meiroktan/606aa7310efe4a45230f69d9
- 
 
- 
 @oktan the reason is because ambit 3 looks more jaggy in the data.  
- 
 @dimitrios-kanellopoulos Ambit3 barometer has 1 meter resolution, Suunto 9 - 20 cm resolution if I remember correctly from looking at the FIT files - either that or Suunto 9 averages over 5 seconds which makes the altitude resolution look more fine grained. But that isn’t the reason Ambit3 has more elevation gain and Suunto 9 has less. These graphs don’t reflect elevation gain because if you simply add all changes on the graphs, that not what the watches report. 
- 
 @sky-runner yeah but adding all the changes even on QS that does not use those filters A3 has way more 
- 
 @Oktan 
 I agree, I’ve been fighting since I bought it with support, from 2020. I joined this forum just to see if I’m the only one and if there is a solution. I have the 9 baro, I use it on a dinghy sail boat, they are always at unsuitable heights or -25m or +30. I’m thinking of selling it.





