@dmytro said in Very wrong counting of the steps in s9b:
@brad_olwin I donāt care either. However, I find this strategy curious at the slightest.
I have a very specific programming experience, but from my perspective it shouldnāt be that time consuming to implement the same algo on all watches, given that libraries for sensors and device specific functions are most probably already written. So it might (!) be as easy as copy/paste. On thing is to say we donāt want to research this direction because itās irrelevant, the other is to stubbornly ignore even it would barely cost any effort (once again, I might underestimate the effort needed).
All in all, itās suuntoās decision, not mine.
100% agree, I do not know why this is. I also do not understand the decision but it may have its roots in the hardware.