Calories Burned - Overstated
-
@sartoric it’s the active calories that I’m not so sure on. Rest of the day looks close enough.
-
@stromdiddily
I mean that 400 includes the active ones AND the metabolic calories burnt during the training.
So if Whoop measure only active ones , you’ll surely find differences -
keep in mind that it is based on HR but differnt sport modes have different tuning
-
In my tests, I made the experience that Garmin and Suunto deliver almost identical values and Polar significantly more. I don’t think they can really measure their calories exactly.
-
@Kurt68 no they can’t. I also heard that our bodies adapt to exercise to a point where total daily calories consumption is the same if we have an active lifestyle or not. Will link to sources later
-
@stromdiddily I was hungry after my last race in March, the watch said I burned 3639 kcal so I believed it.
-
This is the material I was talking about. The page contains the podcast, plus links to articles. Very interesting (according to me).
-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos oh OK. Thought it was based off of the body metrics. Don’t think there is a weights specific profile but perhaps I could create a running specific then play around w the default values
-
@Brad_Olwin did a 9 hour backcountry trip and feeled pretty hungry after that, too. In General I think the calculation works for when seeing on my activity level and how many calories I eat
-
@Stefan-Kersting said in Calories Burned - Overstated:
@Brad_Olwin did a 9 hour backcountry trip and feeled pretty hungry after that, too. In General I think the calculation works for when seeing on my activity level and how many calories I eat
Envious!!! Our snow is dangerous now and not deep enough but soon…I feel the same way after a long SkiMo