Suunto 9 Picasso Edition
-
@zhang965 said in Suunto 9 Picasso Edition:
It looks I’m getting lazy over years
it looks like you need even more sleep now
the track from 2019 is better than the one from 2021 even with GPS improvement updates
I don’t really have something to compare like you do, because I do sports infrequently. Hence no comparison over years for the same tracks at the same time… but what I do notice is that during an activity the GPS precision sometimes is better and sometimes worse but independently from the tree coverage and without steep hills near me. I don’t see a pattern -
I think that also depends on the device, even being the same model, how it is worn and activity speed.
Here two examples, the nice track is from my running partner. He was using an S9B Ti and I the regular S9B. He wears the the watch on the right arm and I on the left. The hill was around 400 m long with 100 m ascent, and he is much faster than me doing downhills and a little bit faster than me in the uphills.
-
@cosmecosta
and the activities were on the same time and day?
at least the alti graph looks alright… but something seems to be always going on… either track or alti
I went downhill running today at sealevel, a loop starting and ending on our campsite
-
@freeheeler Yeah, the activities were the same day and time, we were running together.
I’m not complaining, these things happen, and I can imagine is a combination of the technology itself and the watch design (hard and soft)
Regarding altitude mismatch in loops I tend to believe that this is because we do no let/give time to the GPS/fusialti do its magic, I mean we wait for the green arrow and then we hit start.
The good thing that my friend uses the same watch is that I can compare both watches and regarding altitude we are always very similar, within 10 m difference of ascent but I aslo can say that rarely we are quite off, then usually we have different altitudes at the starting point.
-
@cosmecosta
before I started my “downhill” running activity, I’ve waited around 15mins after the first satellite lock. The reason was, it locked but immediately lost the satellites again. It was a show of around 5min, lock-lost-lock etc… after that I wanted to see that the sats stay locked. -
Pace dropped to 10m/km
-
@zhang965
satellites seem to favour the south-east side of Jardin du Luxembourg -
@freeheeler said in Suunto 9 Picasso Edition:
@zhang965
satellites seem to favour the south-east side of Jardin du LuxembourgI saw 2 black holes which eat my pace (speed dropping),
-
If I run, the number fo satellites reduces, if I walk, the number of satellites seems stable.
Ruuning: the number of stellites droped to 5
Walking
-
@andré-faria the new one might help, but mine is becoming brown. Even washing it after every use doesn’t help
The predecessor at least didn’t change its colours -
Isn’t there some overall problem with newer suunto watches ? My S5 always takes around 20-40 seconds to get initial GPS fix, even when they was synced with phone just few minutes before. With older Ambit 2 when it was synced for AGPS it was often under 10 seconds to get initial fix. Maybe used sony GPS chip is not so good in non ideal conditions ?
-
@tomas5 said in Suunto 9 Picasso Edition:
Isn’t there some overall problem with newer suunto watches ? My S5 always takes around 20-40 seconds to get initial GPS fix, even when they was synced with phone just few minutes before. With older Ambit 2 when it was synced for AGPS it was often under 10 seconds to get initial fix. Maybe used sony GPS chip is not so good in non ideal conditions ?
S9P is super fast for me.
-
@tomas5 takes no more than 10s on my s9.
-
@dmytro just going from work so i counted today, it was exactly 10s but it was unusually fast today. But anyway even it take usualy 20s or more, after fix it works perfectly fine while on bike.
-
@tomas5 my S9B sometimes needs 1+ minute to get a signal. On average around 30sec and this is really annoying. My Girlfriend uses a Forerunner 945 and she gets a GPS signal in 1sec…
-
@theguyfromthesummit said in Suunto 9 Picasso Edition:
@tomas5 my S9B sometimes needs 1+ minute to get a signal. On average around 30sec and this is really annoying. My Girlfriend uses a Forerunner 945 and she gets a GPS signal in 1sec…
have you checked how the tracks looked from one and other before?
I had Fenix 6S that would get gps ok much faster than a Forerunner 45, but then the place of start was totally off in the Fenix 6S. -
@andré-faria boths look fine, sometimes the 945 track is even better than my s9b one.
Every 15th track on the same route my S9B looses gps during the run for some time (straight lines on the gpx). -
@theguyfromthesummit i reported openwater swimming problem on this forum few weeks ago, since i noticed that while swimming i need to keep hands out of water for very long time until watch get locations. I hope that if this will get fixed in future, than this initial fix would be faster too. Since I believe that while openwater swimming, it is same issue because it must fix GPS again when watch get out of water.
-
@tomas5
in my case, the watch is always connected to gps, but then looses signal for a couple secondsBut as long as it only occurs from time to time, I am ok with it.
Here you see the a 1 month window and the lost signal track
-
@theguyfromthesummit i had initially some problem with GPS on S5 because while hiking in hard conditions (narrow valleys), usually during longer stops, GPS position jumped arround and recorded lot of distance while not moving. After i started use galileo + GPS it resolved partly this issue and i learned to manually pause hiking when i stop for while which helped a lot too
