Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Very poor GPC accuracy since last App update

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto 9
    14 Posts 3 Posters 832 Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Brad_OlwinB Offline
      Brad_Olwin Moderator @Gilles D.
      last edited by

      @Gilles-D It does take time for the watch to unpack AGPS files but these should be loaded sometime after midnight. We do not have much to go on here. Images or links to the activities would help some.

      Vector/T6c/Ambit 3 Peak/S5 Copper/S3/S7 Ti/S9 baro Ti/S9P Ti/S9PP Ti/Vertical Ti/Race Ti/RaceS/Ocean/Wing

      Gilles D.G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Gilles D.G Offline
        Gilles D. @Brad_Olwin
        last edited by

        Hello @Brad_Olwin ,
        thanks for providing your help. I thought I had initially loaded 2 images of the workout, but I may have not done it correctly.
        This is the link of the workout (public): https://www.strava.com/activities/11027839242
        In the Lap part, you may see that loop 2 and loop 3 are 5.01 km and 4.83 km.
        Yet the segment is 5.88 km (https://www.strava.com/segments/16570481?filter=overall).
        I have been using Suunto products since 2016 with Ambit 3 Peak, switched to S9B in Septembre 2020, and I had never experienced such erratic GPS recordings.
        Thanks,
        Gilles

        isaziI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • isaziI Offline
          isazi Moderator @Gilles D.
          last edited by

          @Gilles-D I checked your track on Strava, and it seems quite good for a S9B, I do not see any section where it went crazy. Which satellites are you using?

          Watch: Suunto Vertical Ti

          Blog: isazi's home

          Gilles D.G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Gilles D.G Offline
            Gilles D. @isazi
            last edited by

            @isazi hello,
            thanks for looking at my “case” and for your answer.
            I am using GPS+QZSS.
            Regarding the track : my concerns are :

            • the distance measurement : on a 5.8 km loop, the watch measures 5.km the first time, and 4.8 km the second time. There is almost 1 km of difference on 5 km, it is huge!

            • the pace variation : as you can see in the screenshot, there are very important variations in the pace, and it does not reflect the reality. I have added some comments to try to better explain the “case”.

            Maybe the 2 points are connected together somehow?
            Capture d’écran 2024-03-24 à 18.43.32.png Capture d’écran 2024-03-24 à 18.44.05.png

            Brad_OlwinB isaziI 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Brad_OlwinB Offline
              Brad_Olwin Moderator @Gilles D.
              last edited by

              @Gilles-D From the satellite image it appears heavily wooded and the track looks good. I did measure the KM men and women for the track and indeed it is 5.8 km. Either the satellites are not detected well because of the tree cover or there is another problem. I assume you have run this before with past firmware and had 5.8km?

              Vector/T6c/Ambit 3 Peak/S5 Copper/S3/S7 Ti/S9 baro Ti/S9P Ti/S9PP Ti/Vertical Ti/Race Ti/RaceS/Ocean/Wing

              Gilles D.G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Gilles D.G Offline
                Gilles D. @Brad_Olwin
                last edited by

                @Brad_Olwin yes I ran it before, 2 months ago, with same firmware. This place is indeed a wood, and at this time like in January not many leaves. This is the workout in January 24, when I had no issue :
                https://www.strava.com/activities/10504542974/overview
                And you can see the pace is steady, which does reflect what happened during the workout : Capture d’écran 2024-03-26 à 23.40.56.png

                Brad_OlwinB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Brad_OlwinB Offline
                  Brad_Olwin Moderator @Gilles D.
                  last edited by

                  @Gilles-D see what happens next time, hopefully the last one had low satellite quality. Let us know.

                  Vector/T6c/Ambit 3 Peak/S5 Copper/S3/S7 Ti/S9 baro Ti/S9P Ti/S9PP Ti/Vertical Ti/Race Ti/RaceS/Ocean/Wing

                  Gilles D.G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • isaziI Offline
                    isazi Moderator @Gilles D.
                    last edited by

                    @Gilles-D try with GPS+Galileo or GPS+Beidou

                    Watch: Suunto Vertical Ti

                    Blog: isazi's home

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Gilles D.G Offline
                      Gilles D. @Brad_Olwin
                      last edited by

                      @Brad_Olwin, @isazi hello!
                      So I came back on same road, but this time with a new watch (I bought Suunto Vertical in between, I was a bit fed up with my S9 baro not being maintained any more from a software perspective…#obsolescence?).
                      And guess what : same issue with regards to distance measured by GPS vs reality on the ground : missing around 1 km around the same loop.
                      Strava track : https://www.strava.com/activities/11075937052
                      Capture d’écran 2024-03-31 à 16.58.46.png
                      I don’t know what is going on. There is a military air base just next to this wood : can the GPS signal be affected somehow? It would be strange, because I have been running many times close to it, without noticing this kind of discrepancy.

                      Thanks anyway for your time and advises on this topic.
                      Regards,
                      Gilles

                      Gilles D.G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Gilles D.G Offline
                        Gilles D. @Gilles D.
                        last edited by

                        @Gilles-D I was tired with the maths…Sorry
                        13.3 - 7.8 = 5.5 km, still some meters missing. I also did the theoretical distance of the run : 20.4 km vs 19.3 km measured during the workout. Puzzling.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy