-
@paradize not much at all. I think on a 100% it should be 2-3h damage if glonass is on.
Sometimes it could even improve (in cases when the watch strugles) but we took the safe side on the estimates
-
By waiting this update, i was waiting the S9 watchface. I find itâs a really nice one.
But i was expected something a bit different. I give you a picture below with the comparison of what are currently displayed and what i would likeâŚ
-
@Tim4c good points let me tranfer those
-
@Tim4c
Well done Tim, I agree with you -
I would like also that clock hands are behind values to be more readable!
-
-
just to throttle this, you should have seen the debates on the test groups when this was first introduced
-
@VĂĄclav-KrĂĄl come on, its my favorite. Take it or leave it
-
@Tim4c said in SSU 2.5.18 - ON AIR:
I would like also that clock hands are behind values to be more readable!
Digital hour?
-
@suzzlo Why not
-
Good job!
What is âSleep data insightsâ?
-
@dimangi you can see the details of the prev days of sleep (before you could only see the current)
-
Iâve just seen that instant HR monitor is locking on HR faster, around 10 sec.
-
@Tim4c I totally agree with you to see more/different data on the watch screen like and also no duplicate information like twice battery level or sunset information. I think the default watch face you pictured looks nice, but I noticed another flaw: the hour hand is pretty thick. Not a really big problem at some hours of the day, but between 11:00 and 13:00 it can become really tough to read the data field as the color of the text is the same as the hour hand and the text becomes invisible.
-
I like the little update on âchronoâ face ⌠thereâs only one drawback imho, once in âenergy savingâ mode the outer numbers are barely readable.
BEFORE
AFTER
-
wow, nicer than before!
-
Does âNew options for configurable tones (for alarms) in your settings.â mean that silent wakeup alarm is now possible? Thanks
-
@Gerbow
Yep
-
Awesome! Canât wait to try out the new glonass settings!
Good work all.
-
@stromdiddily About Glonass, my vague memory was that it was not improving the GPS accuracy in most cases, only for some (very) specific regions. E.g. in Western Europe activating Glonass would result in a less accurate trace than without.
Am I wrong thinking that? I actually never tried it myself, no facts being my vague memory
