Run 2

[Tieutieu]

@jthomi

Run 2 at left

[jthomi]

@Tieutieu Yes, left is weight of the watch, without strap, weigh of the other watch, in your case the Race S on the right, is with strap. So it’s merely 7g lighter than the Race S.

[Tieutieu]

(@jthomi by bigger I was talking about size more than weight)

[jthomi]

@Tieutieu Still, the Race is bigger than the Run2. The dimensions showed in your screenshot are from the Race S not the Race.

[Tieutieu]

@jthomi oupsi…my mistake the “S” had disapeard from my original message. Yes I meant run 2 VS Race S size

[GratefulDeadpan]

What storage size are people picking? I’m wondering if it’s worth going for the 64gb even if I won’t have music on it. My guess is that it isn’t?

[jthomi]

@Tieutieu If the apac.suunto-website is correct, total weight is 53g

[jthomi]

In desfits review, it seems the 4GB model has no maps??

[GratefulDeadpan]

@jthomi said:

In desfits review, it seems the 4GB model has no maps??

He’s mistaken… ooor Suunto is about to get a whole lot of watches sent back

[jthomi]

@GratefulDeadpan Yes, think so too, Suunto website says both versions “maps+music”.

[jthomi]

In the comments Desfit says “The Information I received said maps were on the 64GB version” …well i thought this would be a review?

[GratefulDeadpan]

@jthomi too many shills on Youtube these days.

[johann.fuehrer]

@GratefulDeadpan it’s all clear to read on Suunto website, as you say…

[GratefulDeadpan]

@jthomi said:

@GratefulDeadpan Yes, think so too, Suunto website says both versions “maps+music”.

Exactly. What still confuses me though is what the difference is between Standard / Premium. Will the maps on the 64gb be of higher fidelity with names etc like R2/V2? Because it seems all reviewers have only seen the 4gb option and those maps are less detailed than what was just pushed to R2/V2.

[Highlands]

I wonder if Run 2 will help Suunto win over some runners from the Forunner crowd.
Also, it would be interesting to see how sales perform compared to sales of Huawei GT Runner 2.

[jthomi]

German review, interesting details to the maps
https://youtu.be/rTg6yM10m10

Seems like the maps are not so detailed in comparison with maps like on Race 2, would be interesting if the 64GB model which is called premium has those more detailed maps, while the 4GB has the lesser ones…

[enriqueescoms]

@Kraisun-Tunta What is clear is that RUN2 and RACEs are now overlapping, both in price and practically in usage.

[GratefulDeadpan]

@jthomi yeah that’s what I pointed out and wondered above ️

[GratefulDeadpan]

@enriqueescoms said:

@Kraisun-Tunta What is clear is that RUN2 and RACEs are now overlapping, both in price and practically in usage.

Shhhh. People will play you the S+ card if you say things like that.

Edit: I agree with you, I barely find any idea of S+ with my Run as it is as many of the features I wanted from that platform is already natively baked into the OS.

[Inge Nallsson]

@GratefulDeadpan said:

What storage size are people picking? I’m wondering if it’s work going for the 64gb even if I won’t have music on it. My guess is that it isn’t?

When I first installed maps on the Race S (which has 28 GB free for the maps) I went with the whole of Sweden, Denmark, the Norwegian Oslo area and some near Finnish areas. It took an inordinate time - even though Sweden is at maximum 4 GB of the maps. When Suunto updated the maps - happens infrequently - I restricted the downloads to only the southern half of Sweden. After the last map updates I went with Scania exclusively (Skåne County) which is 129 MB… This is where I run I don’t travel, and if I would, along with all other preparations a map download doesn’t seem too onerous.

On the other hand, there is a mere 600 SKr difference between the 4GB and 64GB (about 63 US$ today). Hardly a fortune.