Is the watch under warranty? If so, send it to a service center before warranty expires.

@jjpaz I actually love it, so I’m a little disappointed because the watch is really nice, but the thought that my workouts and the averages I’m trying so hard to maintain are somewhat distorted by an inaccurate clock reading is quite discouraging. I’ll do some more tests; this week I’ll try to see how it performs on intervals. This is the today comparison from Strava of the 2 results: [image: 1769980171190-efce7a11-3cf0-474c-b9f6-d284f1c959f4-image.png]

@louispar I think OHR is very hard. Suunto works for me with consistent easy running, walking and sleeping as well as around the house. I run a lot technical trails and OHR is good but not great. For intervals I don’t bother with OHR from any brand. On my wrist neither Garmin (Epix2) or Apple Watch Ultra 2 or Suunto V2/R2 are good enough.

@Tieutieu yes agree looks great!

@Squirrel Thanks, I didn’t know that. I’ll try it.

@geolerigolo said in Categorization of strength impact: @sartoric Ok thanks! What about speed and agility? I had the same question today, searched, and found this unanswered question. What is “speed and agility”?

@stbuk In the new software on the new watches it is now autodetect. You are not given the option to choose a time.

@GiPFELKiND the only way is control panel -> Notifications

@GiPFELKiND thanks for the tip. But I doesn’t work. Maybe because I’m on iOS?

Hello @pavel.samokha & SUUNTO! When can we expect an update in freediving mode? @johnkokk provided you guys with very articulate, excellent, and NEEDED update guidance already 1,5 years ago, and it’s not been implemented. This is quite crazy that this has NOT been updated. What’s the blocker on this side? These changes are… not the hardest to make as the functionality is there. We truly need this info. First order of update would be what John said, and secondly - STA and DYN could be really useful, too. In last update there was tons of needed stuff, yes, but adding 22 new sports before fixing one of key USP & Promises? Not cool. PLEASE ADDRESS THIS! Thanks

@sky-runner I’m sorry, I didn’t mean the graph would look compressed, rather the complete UI would, as it would reduce the whitespace below the headline. If you look at the Android representation, you have a 100 line, but whitespace over the line. TBH I think it looks better with the 120 line and the whitespace. My problem is that the range is shifting around on iOS…

@jjpaz Small oscillations in altitude aren’t necessary added to the ascent and descent. There is a threshold. The best way to observe that on the watch is to have a custom data screen with the altitude field side by side with ascent and descent fields. These fields don’t change at the same time.

I have bought used Race for test, but still in warranty. Battery life was much lower, according to spec’s. With everything off, it took 6% per day on a shelf. So I returned it, they changed whole watch and after that, with everything off, same scenario, there was still about 15% left after two months! Now my college has bought it from me. I’m extremely satisfied with V2 battery life and supposed it will be very good with Race too. I will never go back to buggy Garmin.

@kemetter said in Suunto Routeplanner: This should match Suunto app quite well, but some GPX files have quite odd content. I would need the original GPX file in question to be able to resolve this. Waypoints should load if GPX is exported from Suunto app, but from other sites it’s not a standard how they mark user named waypoints. Here is one example, which I think I created this in Strava: Issy Alps 50k.gpx When I load this in Suunto App it shows all waypoints and the distance is 50 km: [image: 1769826713292-screenshot-2026-01-30-at-6.31.23-pm.png] When I load the same GPX file in the routeplanner, no waypoints are shown and the distance is 42 km: [image: 1769826789058-screenshot-2026-01-30-at-6.32.48-pm.png] It may not be obvious by looking at the screenshots but the missing parts are from the start to the first waypoint and from the last waypoint to the finish. Basically, the route now starts at the top of the first mountain and ends at the top of the last mountain. I’ve had similar issues with a few more GPX routes. Also, I should mention that on-route waypoints can also be present in routes that are saved as FIT files. Those can be generated by some route planners such as PlotARoute and are natively supported by Garmin. It would be great if the route planner could load routes in the FIT format too. Also, routes in FIT format can embed turn directions, and some route editors (e.g. PlotARoute) can create those too. It would be awesome is Suunto followed the same standard.

@ADidier there’s no third-party workout integration on Suunto Run.

@ADidier it’s been on the Suunto Run since July 2025