DC Rainmaker Review
-
I couldn’t care less about what DCR and other Garmin employees of the year say about R3S.
I go back to my first job out of college when I think about reviewers. I was working at a newspaper, and the editor of the newspaper used to be the direct boss of Roger Ebert, the famous film critic. So we only ran Ebert movie reviews in our paper.
The thing is, I didn’t always agree with Ebert’s assessment of movies, but after four years reading and editing his reviews, I was able to figure out what stood out to him, what mattered most when he watched a movie, and what were his “unwritten” thoughts – basically how to read between the lines. So I didn’t care about how he felt about a movie, but the way he said things mattered and helped me determine if I would like a film.
It’s really a talent to read or listen to a reviewer long enough and be able to understand/assess your own takeaway.
Suunto Vertical 2 / Run / Race S (gifted away) / Vertical / 9 Peak Pro (gifted away) / 9 Baro / 5 Peak (lost on adventure) / Vector
-----------‐-----------
Trail Runner / Hiker / Kickboxer
Instagram: @rytipps -
I take all those reviews as another source of information, and mostly ignore their opinions on the stuff they review.
-
@isazi
Maybe I am wrong, but seems to me that DCRainmaker would not have been so negative, if the US price was $499 or $450.
At $599 in the US it is at a non-insignificant disadvantage against its recently released “direct competitor” from Coros - Pace 4 Pro ($450).Run 2 and Race 3S are significantly more expensive in the US vs EU / rest of the world (I assume this is predominantly due to Trump’s tariffs). This wasn’t the case for all previous Suunto models. It is also not the case for any competitors’ offerings as far as I am aware.
And for these reviewers being US-based and/or the majority of their viewers being US-based, from their perspective it is logical to have their verdict of the respective product reflect its US price much more than its rest-of-the-world price.
-
@TrailEyes I understand what you’re saying here but my point is that I dislike the fact that all those YT reviewers refuse to reveal that they are more or less sales personnel of Garmin. Or whatever they call them. They are not transparent about their affiliation with Garmin. So, regardless of how good they are at what they do, I personally wouldn’t bother paying attention to them. I’m quite capable of making my own decisions without having to rely on that kind of “information “.
-
@Highlands I mean the point is , reviewing a garmin means more clicks, more clicks means more money. So, they review a watch . Do cross comparisons across models and what not. While they claim they are independent , they are not really as they give garnin just more “airtime” compared to others. I mean classic example is DCr hasn’t even reviewed the run2 yet…
-
@Highlands I mean the point is , reviewing a garmin means more clicks, more clicks means more money. So, they review a watch . Do cross comparisons across models and what not. While they claim they are independent , they are not really as they give garnin just more “airtime” compared to others. I mean classic example is DCr hasn’t even reviewed the run2 yet…
Garmin also releases more models in general, right? Looking at Apple, which sells a ton of Apple Watches, those models get covered very quickly because there’s viewer interest in them, but I imagine the overall number of videos/reviews for Apple is less than Garmin over time simply as there’s less models and they tend to get released once a year rather than multiple points of the year.
Meanwhile, let’s take Huawei, which gets little coverage, also due to viewer demand, this time the lack of it, and the fact the models aren’t available in some major markets like the USA. So for people like Ray to cover them, I guess the only way that’s work is if they were funded totally by Patreon rather than ad revenue through YouTube.
-
All the other reviews I’ve read mention a reliable GPS and heart rate. Everyone has to find what matters to them. I have a small wrist, I like watches with a style that isn’t too sporty (I still love the look of my 9PP, which I wear every day), and I couldn’t care less about a microphone, flashlight, voice features, or a speaker… I do hiking so maps are a +. In Garmin, the map are on really pricing watch (much more than Race 3s). So I think I will try it!
-
DC Rainmaker reviews were among the ones what convinced me to buy Race 2 instead of Garmin. After 3 month I have it, I regret the buy. I do not blame anybody but me - I was not properly reading between lines. Now I feel DC Rainmaker made more honest review of Race 3S then on Race 2. In my opinion, the multitude of problems can no longer be concealed. Or we accept honest reviews or we accept the lie.
I am still trying to go ahead with Race 2… -
Or we accept honest reviews or we accept the lie.
There are so many lesser-known reviewers out there who deserve to be discovered and who, more often than not, are far better than the more famous ones
-
In my opinion, the multitude of problems can no longer be concealed.
What I’ve learned from sportwatches over the last 20 years, they all have their annoyances but most you can live with. Some annoyances are that big it makes you buy an other watch (for me that happened with the garmin forerunner 965). Does my race s have annoyances? Yes, sure. Did any reviewer ever mentioned the annoyances I experienced with my watches? No, never. Not one. Does that make me awkward? Might. Or reviewers just don’t live with a watch 24/7 for quite some time. They just have superficial experience with specific watches.
-
Lately, a lot of new channels have been popping up on YouTube where we can watch “reviews.” Of course, most—if not all—of them just read out the specs; there’s no review to speak of. Besides, if you take a closer look, you’ll see that these “reviewers” had the watch on their wrist for a maximum of 2–3 days when, for example, they demonstrate how the sleep screen works. They’re flooding us with low-quality junk, devoid of any substance. Lately, I’ve stopped watching all these reviews because I can find most of the information on the manufacturer’s website.
You can criticize Ray for many things, but he’s probably the only one who creates text-based reviews with tables and charts—and he puts a lot of work into them. He often makes comparisons and conducts lengthy tests to see how the battery performs in real-world use, etc.
I really like the watch, but I get the impression it was released too early. They could have held off and released it with a working race intensity planner, a working AI assistant, and a working MCP server. As it is, we get the impression that something is coming, but in reality, we don’t know how much it will cost after the trial period. Well, that’s not how it should be.
The price argument is valid; I’m surprised Suunto didn’t offer a choice (steel or titanium, 64 vs. 32 GB). -
Coros vs Race 3 better quality in components (high quality internals) and better structural design.
A lot of watches are glued together. This one aint. Plus working hard for a carbon neutral.
Some things to share.
Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
Creator of quantified-self.io — a next gen training dashboard with MCP access, cross-service activity and route sync
-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos race 3 or 3s?
-
@thanasis race 3 confirmed!
-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos said:
better quality in components
Better quality for what? Are the components more accurate? Are they faster? Do they provide new functionality? Will the battery hold it capacity better after 5 years of use?
And the big question: is it supported by firmware updates longer? (and more specific, how fast are bugs solved)
Just saying, ‘it’s better’ doesn’t say much.
It’s like a college of mine bragging about his rolex can survive in boiling water. Well, I never lost a watch due to damage done by boiling water. And besides, my watch is on my wrist. If it’s in boiling water I’m too and that is a bigger problem than a damaged watch.
Just to say, sure, a rolex has better build quality. But it’s high quality internals and build is over engineered. (to justify it’s high price?)
-
It’s the classic script: “We’re better than the others — just trust us.” Except this line stopped working a while ago. And please, spare me the carbon‑neutrality fairy tales — they sound especially… poetic coming from a capitalist playbook.
-
@elbee Moreover, there is “also” firmware. Without good firmware, any great hardware is nothing.
-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos Are there sources for your arguments? In the past there were some CO2 declarations, but now? Also regarding the quality. If its true it should be communicated better
-
@VoiGAS Suunto is publishing Sustainability Reports every year. Here is the latest:
https://www.suunto.com/globalassets/about-suunto/sustainability/documents/suunto-sustainability-report-2025-14mb.pdfYou will find, that the production emissions are 100% compensated.
-
You will find, that the production emissions are 100% compensated.
You say production emissions are 100% compensated. Does that include products made at the Suunto China factory? According to this 2025 sustainability report, only 42% of products were made in Finland, and the report covers Suunto Oy only, with no energy or emissions data for the China factory. And now in 2026 I think much more than 42% is made in China, so I am not surprised “sustainability” is not used in Suunto’s marketing anymore.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login