Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Problème cumul dénivelé positif sur une course

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto 9
    21 Posts 5 Posters 933 Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • freeheelerF Offline
      freeheeler @Mi_chael
      last edited by

      @Mi_chael
      I’m so glad we have Google translate 😉
      it would be helpful to see the alti graph… if this run is mostly flat the difference between the watch and the “correct” total ascent could be because of the famouse 3meters “issue”

      living sideways

      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ? Offline
        A Former User @freeheeler
        last edited by A Former User

        @TELE-HO said in Problème cumul dénivelé positif sur une course:

        if this run is mostly flat the difference between the watch and the “correct” total ascent could be because of the famouse 3meters “issue”

        How can it be mostly flat if the gain is more than 5 km in in 100 km? That means the average grade is about 10% (assuming a similar amount of elevation loss).

        And yes, even if all the climbs and descents are larger than 3 meters, Suunto 9 still counts less ascent than actual. I posted about this issue in details in the past.

        freeheelerF P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • freeheelerF Offline
          freeheeler @Guest
          last edited by

          @silentvoyager
          sorry, I did not want to say most of the trail is flat… I imagined if a long enough distance is small ups and downs, not entire trail.
          you’re right, we’ve had this topic couple of times.
          I understand that finding the answers is not easy even with a good search function

          living sideways

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P Offline
            PatBess @Guest
            last edited by

            @silentvoyager You’re right, it wasn’t flat !!
            So it’s a problem with the watch ? A difference of 1000 meters is a big problem on that race !!

            freeheelerF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • freeheelerF Offline
              freeheeler @PatBess
              last edited by

              @PatBess
              did you compare your alti graph with the original already?
              I just looked it up and saw that your screenshots are similar to the original graph (don’t get me wrong, for sure it’s not flat) but it might be something in the detail…
              the original graph shows tonns of small spikes

              living sideways

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • freeheelerF Offline
                freeheeler
                last edited by

                spikes example…
                I’m interested in that because I went on the same trail last week with 2 different total ascent results
                Screenshot_20191020-233421.png

                living sideways

                P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P Offline
                  PatBess @freeheeler
                  last edited by

                  @TELE-HO Yes there was a lot of small spikes ! I don’t know how to have more details with the file my S9Baro recorded…
                  Maybe the software of the watch is sort of “flattening” the smaller pikes, which could explain the elevation difference ?

                  freeheelerF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • freeheelerF Offline
                    freeheeler @PatBess
                    last edited by

                    @PatBess
                    that’s what I also like to know…
                    first pic is with total ascent of 240m.
                    second pic is with total ascent of 286m. exactly the same trail but the 2nd day with some “noise” in the recording. I assume day 1 was right and day 2 with the noises, something went wrong. it your case it must be vice versa…

                    Screenshot_20191020-235412.png Screenshot_20191020-235445.png

                    living sideways

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • 7 Offline
                      77alex77 Bronze Member
                      last edited by

                      Hello,

                      I ran the Marathon des Causses, Festival des templiers, Millau on Saturday : 37 km and 1780m ascent. My S9 baro recorded 36.5 km and 1658m ascent, an error about of 100m. I syncronized AGPS the morning before the race. One day before I recalibrated the compass and requested an automatique adjustment for altitude.

                      (Félicitations PatBess pour ta course)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • P Offline
                        PatBess
                        last edited by

                        « Flattening » 3280 feet is quite a big issue for me !
                        I’m very disappointed !

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy