Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Wrist HR worse accuracy?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto 9 Peak
    27 Posts 12 Posters 2.0k Views 12 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • EfejotaE Offline
      Efejota Bronze Member @ChrisA
      last edited by

      @chrisa You are right, I didn’t think of that.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • suzzloS Offline
        suzzlo Moderator @ChrisA
        last edited by

        @chrisa totally agree. Wearing globes is sometimes a must! or think when you are swimming with a long suitwear…

        Suunto: Race, S9Peak, Spartan Sport Wrist
        Garmin: FR745, Edge 530
        SA topics:

        • Guides - https://forum.suunto.com/tags/guides
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • EfejotaE Offline
          Efejota Bronze Member
          last edited by

          Dear all. After struggling with very bad readings using OHR, I decided to make a test. I recorded a run today and used the belt and the Suunto App in the phone to compare. This is the result (OHR is blue)
          Captura de Pantalla 2022-03-26 a las 17.30.49.png
          Things I noticed.
          (1) There are a lot of 0 reading. You can see them in the blue lines. In comparison, the belt almost had no failure.
          (2) There is a HUGE difference of accuracy when I decided to put the watch AND MY HAND into my sleeve. It seems that the problem is having cold hands, and not cold arm.
          Even then, there are some peaks. You can see when I decided to put it into my shirt: the graphic is very similar since after the first part. I put it out again and notice almost no difference until the last part, where you can see a peak. The watch was outside the shirt since some time before and the performance seems not to be affected.

          Seeing this I must say that weather makes a big difference, even if it is not very cold (around 11º today), at least in my case. I have no explanation to the big difference at the end. Environment and watch position did not change.

          Finally. At the end, I tried with both the basic OHR and the app, and noticed that it takes about 1 min for the watch to stibilize. Since then readings are more or less consistent, although big arm movement (watch position unaffected) raised the numbers, that were stable according to the belt.

          I hope that this info is useful. I will keep trying to reach a definite conclusion with more runs and different weather.

          aroo7A Dimitrios KanellopoulosD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • aroo7A Offline
            aroo7 Bronze Member @Efejota
            last edited by

            @efejota stop kidding yourself 😉 wrist-based heart rate measurement during an activity doesn’t make much sense. The wrist is a poor place to measure your heart rate. It flexes, gets cold quickly and, moreover, has few blood vessels. Wirts OHR in S9P is really good and does its job but outside of training when you rest and recover.

            EfejotaE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
              Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager @Efejota
              last edited by

              @efejota said in Wrist HR worse accuracy?:

              There are a lot of 0 reading. You can see them in the blue lines. In comparison, the belt almost had no failure

              Those are not 0\s your app is converting them 🙂

              Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
              Creator of Quantified-Self.io
              youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
              https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
              https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

              EfejotaE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • EfejotaE Offline
                Efejota Bronze Member @Dimitrios Kanellopoulos
                last edited by Efejota

                @dimitrios-kanellopoulos I simply downloaded the GPX from QS, in fact, and extracted as CSV to be used in Excel (after struggling in finding a free alternative to compare two .fit or .GPX files, any advice?). Are they not zero readings?

                J

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • EfejotaE Offline
                  Efejota Bronze Member @aroo7
                  last edited by Efejota

                  @aroo7 I do not fully agree. My experience when I started using S9P in August was impressive. It was really accurate. Of course I do not pretend it to be as precise as a belt or an ECR, but those differences are substantial. If I have to believe those readings, I should visit the doctor. That is why I am trying to understand why, because it is obviously more comfortable to wear the watch, without the belt.

                  I have an additional question. Is it possible that readings can be affected by movement? Even with the watch properly attached to my wrist, in slow exercises (hiking, for instance), numbers are very precise (I assume that readings are poor if the watch moves constantly around my wrist, I refer to watch remaining at the same place and affected only by arm movement).

                  J

                  isaziI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • isaziI Offline
                    isazi Moderator @Efejota
                    last edited by

                    @efejota said in Wrist HR worse accuracy?:

                    I have an additional question. Is it possible that readings can be affected by movement? Even with the watch properly attached to my wrist, in slow exercises (hiking, for instance), numbers are very precise (I assume that readings are poor if the watch moves constantly around my wrist, I refer to watch remaining at the same place and affected only by arm movement).

                    Measurements are affected by movement, and by what you do with your hands (together with temperature). Movement may add noise to the readings, what you do with your hands and temperature may affect blood flow.

                    Watch: Suunto Vertical Ti

                    Blog: isazi's home

                    EgikaE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • EgikaE Online
                      Egika Platinum Member @isazi
                      last edited by

                      @isazi and using poles almost ruins everything…

                      t6, S6, Elementum Terra, Ambit 3 Sapphire, Spartan Ultra Copper, Traverse Alpha, S7 Graphite LE, S9B Ambassador, S9P Granite Blue Titanium, S9PP Titanium Sand, Vertical All Black, Race Titanium Charcoal,
                      Race S All Black - Titanium Courtney
                      Run Lime

                      sartoricS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • sartoricS Offline
                        sartoric Moderator @Egika
                        last edited by sartoric

                        yep, as you’re flexing muscles repeatedly

                        e.g. weight lifting is one of the most challenging sport to monitor with WHR

                        SVTS - 2.40.38
                        SSSWHR BARO Amber - 2.8.32
                        Samsung A5 2016 - Android 7.0
                        Samsung A33 2022 - Android 14 - One UI 6.1
                        Suunto App Android 5.3.5 beta
                        Suunto App IOs 2.46.0 (19453) beta on MBP M1

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy