Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    OHR accuracy of owners of Race 2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto Race 2
    45 Posts 20 Posters 4.8k Views 18 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Tomas5T Offline
      Tomas5 Gold Members @Matteiva
      last edited by

      @Matteiva my test from bike ride turned out good. Comparing to chest strap. I will do similar for walking activities. I am suspiciouse there is possible cadence lock when watch is not tight on your wrist. But i will see after comparison with chest strap. Hope i will find time to test this week.

      Suunto Ambit 2, Suunto 5, Suunto Race 2

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • Tomas5T Offline
        Tomas5 Gold Members
        last edited by

        With old Suunto 5 i hade from time to time crazy high HR measurement using OHR sensor. At least this didn’t occured yet on Race 2. So big improvement in that for my.

        Suunto Ambit 2, Suunto 5, Suunto Race 2

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          Matteiva @Tomas5
          last edited by Matteiva

          @Tomas5 🙂 in 10 years that’s the worst OHR I have ever seen for me while running

          chest are always the best for specific workout, but for daily training or trail a good OHR should be enough, I use both chest and ohr, but very disappointed with the race 2, meaning I can not train with it’s ohr 🙂

          G G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G Offline
            gogapo @Matteiva
            last edited by

            @Matteiva I’ve been having a few problems with my Race 2, but OHR isn’t one of them — it’s actually been quite good, to be fair. Much better than my previous Coros Pace 3.

            Today I did a 45-minute workout: 5 minutes in zone 1, 30 minutes in zone 2, and 10 minutes in zones 4 and 5. The watch performed impeccably in terms of OHR accuracy, as you can see here

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • G Offline
              Gunnar Bronze Member @Matteiva
              last edited by

              @Matteiva hey, I am curious. Which OHR did you use 10 years ago? Must have been one of the first gadgets.

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                Matteiva @Gunnar
                last edited by

                @Gunnar Tomtom watch, maybe not 10 but 8 🙂 ohr was better 🙂

                G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  Matteiva @gogapo
                  last edited by

                  @gogapo it surely depends per individual, skin tone, pilosity, and veins

                  I always used same strong nylon scratch band since garmin fenix 6x

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • G Offline
                    Gunnar Bronze Member @Matteiva
                    last edited by Gunnar

                    @Matteiva I just read a review of the Tomtom runner 3. Same user experience as today for current watches. Nothing changed apparently 😉

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      Matteiva @Gunnar
                      last edited by Matteiva

                      @Gunnar 🙂 yes I remember it was almost 10 bits above my real heart rate, but race 2 was 25/30 yesterday evening, during all my activity 🙂

                      And garmin epix pro 2 was spot on most of the time, same type of band same personn ( me ! )

                      Hoping a fix soon

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J Offline
                        jsmno
                        last edited by

                        Hi everyone. I am new to this forum. And I am the owner of my first Suunto device.
                        I really like the Race 2. They have a nice weight, a nice large display, and easy control with the digital crown.
                        What I am disappointed with is the quality of the OHR measurement. Today I had a light running workout in zone 1-2 during which I can breathe through my nose easily. From the chest strap I know that at this pace my heart rate is around 130-140. I ran downhill and my heart rate was 164-172. This is the heart rate I get during interval training!
                        I feel like my old Garmin Fenix ​​6 pro was more accurate. I know that OHR can’t record sudden changes in pace, but at the same pace it measures 20-30 beats more. I really don’t understand this and I’m afraid it’s more of a hardware issue than a software one.
                        I have white skin. Original suunto textile strap. Tight enough.

                        I have an ultramarathon coming up this weekend and I’m angry that I can’t rely on the watch. I don’t feel like wearing a chest strap for 100km…

                        VoiGASV Brad_OlwinB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • VoiGASV Offline
                          VoiGAS Silver Members @jsmno
                          last edited by

                          @jsmno Unfortunatly Downhill the watches OHR have problems with “cadence lock” because it believes the movements are your heartbeat…
                          But as far as I know all manufacturers have this problem, interesting to hear that Garmin seems to be better in this aspect


                          Race S
                          Ambit3 Vertical

                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M Offline
                            Matteiva @VoiGAS
                            last edited by

                            @VoiGAS there is absolutaly no doubt that garmin since fenix 6 has good ohr. Tested race 2 for few more runs this week, even shaving the skin, measures still a total disaster.

                            Jean-Philippe REYJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                            • Jean-Philippe REYJ Offline
                              Jean-Philippe REY @Matteiva
                              last edited by

                              @Matteiva I also shave m’y wrist ,🤣 but the result was not effective.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • Brad_OlwinB Offline
                                Brad_Olwin Moderator @jsmno
                                last edited by

                                @jsmno OHR on any watch for me is problematic. I’ve tried most of them. Because ZoneSense is so useful I use the Suunto belt most of the time and when running ultra races. I think OHR is highly variable based on individuals because of the underlying technology.

                                Vector/T6c/Ambit 3 Peak/S5 Copper/S3/S7 Ti/S9 baro Ti/S9P Ti/S9PP Ti/Vertical Ti/Race Ti/RaceS/Ocean/Wing/Race2Ti

                                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • S Offline
                                  Shrek3k @Brad_Olwin
                                  last edited by

                                  @Brad_Olwin fully agree, OHR for me is always spot on with Vertical 1 with the velcro-band and a quite tight fit.

                                  using a Suunto Vertical & Suunto Wings; mostly running (AKA stomping around) and cycling through the northern german "wilderness", and wherever else I have the chance to do so
                                  OS - Android 16/Pixel Pro 7

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • L Offline
                                    larrybbaker
                                    last edited by larrybbaker

                                    3 days now with Race 2. OHR seems very accurate in 24x7, walking and a 30 minute Zwift ride today.

                                    SV Solar
                                    iPhone 16 Pro

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • M Offline
                                      Matteiva
                                      last edited by

                                      I am starting to think that some Race 2 got OHR problems, software or hardware ?

                                      I ran a first and perfect 10k with a fresh new Vertical 2, spot on from start to finish, with the same nylon stretch band than Race 2, same individual.

                                      For reminder, for me with this Race 2
                                      8k 5:35mn/km 160 average most often 165/170
                                      Then
                                      8k 4:43mn/km 138 average with some 120 at 4:00mn/k

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Tomas5T Offline
                                        Tomas5 Gold Members
                                        last edited by

                                        Here is comparison of Suunto 5 (with Suunto Smart Sensor) vs Suunto Race 2 (OHR). I had Race 2 tight enough but still comfortible. It is possible to tighten it one hole more but than it is not comfortable to wear anymore.
                                        amCharts.png

                                        Suunto Ambit 2, Suunto 5, Suunto Race 2

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • First post
                                          Last post

                                        Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy