Run 2
-
@Highlands €50 for unused space is a however incredibly unnecessary for me
-
Not saying that Dave is right here, but…
Either way, Suunto seems to have flubbed the clarification of the difference between the two versions, especially with the early reviews.
Maybe the 4gb model wasn’t originally going to have maps, but Suunto changed their mind after the Coros announcement?
This sounds plausible and would correlate quite well with the naming convention!
-
@duffman19 To be fair, this isn’t Suunto directly but their U.S.-based PR firm OutsidePR. They’ve given me wrong information before too, so it’s not super surprising.
-
@TrailEyes Yeah, I don’t imagine he has a direct link to the best information. It’s just a bummer that the confusion happened in the first place.
-
The maps on Run 2 are the same, whatever memory you get.
The difference to the more outdoor and adventure focused watches is that there are no extra labels, like street names, POIs etc. You get contour lines and this is pretty much it.
Good enough to follow a route, a little limited to explore the unknown
-
@GratefulDeadpan Not really cause I can fill more than 10GB with offline music. But each to their own.
-
@Highlands yeah I was obviously talking from my perspective. As in that I wouldn’t have music on the watch at all in the first place—so in other words unused space for me.
-
@Egika Ty! Wonder if Suunto will budge on this given how Coros present maps on Pace 4 which in a way then presents a better value (to some). For me it won’t matter much as I would just need to see where a trail might take me, and if I should choose different and it seems I will be able to make that call with the Run 2.
-
@GratefulDeadpan The point isn’t whether one listens to music or not. I might prefer to stream music on my iPhone. Then I need no space for offline music. But I used to have Race 1 with 16 GB, I travel and it’s not convenient to keep only small amount of maps on the watch. Suunto doesn’t update maps often. For me, the inconvenience to delete and download maps because I picked up the 4 GB version isn’t worth it 50€ spared.
The bigger problem is that Race 2 here costs 422€. If I were on the market for a new Suunto, I’d pick any time the Race 2. I know you’ll say like that one would end up with V2 but for 72€ one gets the sapphire, more detailed maps and 55 hours of dual band with the Race 2. But if one doesn’t need all those things, better off staying with Run 1. -
GratefulDeadpan
-
@Highlands okay, so in my initial question regarding which storage size I should pick I did mention that I wouldn’t use any of it for music. Regarding the pita of loading maps due to travel—that is likely never happening to me either as I very rarely travel.
Thanks for helping me come to the conclusion that the 4gb version is most likely good enough for me
But I hear your point and if I needed it I would also pay for the convenience. But would rather buy the V2 for the added convenience of the flashlight in that case.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login