S9P review from a non-target audience
-
@t1sugar said in S9P review from a non-target audience:
With S9P:
The GPS trace for my first run with S9P is amazing, I could not beg for more, I still notice some speed drop, but generally it’s perfect.Hi, Interested to know what GPS Combo you used?
I have tried GPS + Glonass: so so results - I get quite bad offset even though I run with watch face mostly facing the sky rather than facing the skyand GPS + Beidou: slightly better results for Northumberland UK - less offset noticed, very similar if not the same as S9B tracks
I know many variables / daily conditions can influence etc but still interested to know your sat combo used.
Many thanksHave you tried GPS only?
I use GPS + Galileo
-
Have you tried GPS only?
I use GPS + Galileo
No! I haven’t or indeed the galileo combo, both of which I will try
Many thanks
T -
@zhang965
nice summary
-
@nickk for sure.
-
@tonyg I think that the offset may be because of fused speed - as long as it stays constant until you change direction. But that’s just my hypothesis.
-
@łukasz-szmigiel interesting hypothesis; the offset does appear at random times after a 90 deg. turn, then sometimes corrects after another 90deg turn, not consistently; so may be coincident. My next run will be using Galileo combo, I will keep a closer eye on the offsets if any.
apologies @zhang965 for the slight hijack of your review. -
@tonyg I’ve observed this with previous firmware on S5 too (it hardly ever happens on current). I suspect that when running constantly if fusedspeed is at work, such offsets must happen in order to avoid discrepancies between pace and distance.
So when you turn and there’s an offset compared to your real location but you continue running, the offset will remain as correcting it would change pace.
I suspect there’s a certain speed and angle threshold for when it can be corrected.
-
Update a GPS test
-
Nice review!
Have you tested the OHR during an activity?
In the beginning I used my S9B without a HR belt and the HR always was 46-60bpm, but my HR was 135-140bpm.
-
@theguyfromthesummit said in S9P review from a non-target audience:
Nice review!
Have you tested the OHR during an activity?
In the beginning I used my S9B without a HR belt and the HR always was 46-60bpm, but my HR was 135-140bpm.
Nope, I only use HR belt for sports…
-
@zhang965 thanks!
-
Nice review!!
I could see myself buying a S9P but the lack of an official Suunto web frontend comparable to movescount is totally unacceptable to me at such price range. -
Thanks for this in depth data and review, really appreciate you taking the time to type it all up
-
@jsuarez said in S9P review from a non-target audience:
Nice review!!
I could see myself buying a S9P but the lack of an official Suunto web frontend comparable to movescount is totally unacceptable to me at such price range.When Windows 11 comes out later this year the Suunto Android app “should” run on it. We’ll see. Of course, that still won’t be a full web site.
-
@jsuarez it’s not only Suunto. Coros also does not have any web frontend. If web front is very important to you, only Garmin and Polar still have them.
-
@jsuarez said in S9P review from a non-target audience:
Nice review!!
I could see myself buying a S9P but the lack of an official Suunto web frontend comparable to movescount is totally unacceptable to me at such price range.You can use sport tracker as the web front-end, you can log in with your suuntoApp account
-
@kk1n76 That’s what I did almost 2 years ago.
-
-
@jsuarez said in S9P review from a non-target audience:
@zhang965 Thank you, @zhang965 . However, that frontend is extremely subpar. It does not compare at all to Movescount.
yes I know, but it’s a good signal that a web interface could be developed after all.
Winners Wear Winners
-
@jsuarez have you tried quantified-self or runalyze? You can link both services with Suunto - sync will be automatic and you can also sync older workouts.
