Suunto 7 Successor

[A Former User]

@suzzlo said in Suunto 7 Successor:

Watches don’t run

LOL!!!

[Jamie BG]

@olymay - evelate 4 sensor isn’t that much better than the elevate 3 sensor - slightly better improvement on HIIT, but looks like slightly worse on cycling - still a very new sensor so suspect will improve in time. Main performance boost is on the SPO2 - which is of minimal benefit.

Suggested that F7 will be 2 flavours - touchscreen or solar.

[olymay]

@jamie-bg said in Suunto 7 Successor:

@olymay - evelate 4 sensor isn’t that much better than the elevate 3 sensor - slightly better improvement on HIIT, but looks like slightly worse on cycling - still a very new sensor so suspect will improve in time. Main performance boost is on the SPO2 - which is of minimal benefit.

Suggested that F7 will be 2 flavours - touchscreen or solar.

Any new hardware will take time to have the software fully optimised, happens with all devices, so I’m sure they will get better and better (once they iron out the inevitable bugs at launch).

The rumours suggest the F7 will be both touchscreen and solar, with there being no Pro option this year (all versions will essentially be the Pro).
I’m not bothered about solar, I won’t be out doing multiday events. But touch for navigating maps is a must (as well as for quickly moving around menus etc, it’s so quick and easy). Having the option to use both during a workout is nice, but buttons win for me.

Ideally I want an upgraded S7, and I am prepared to wait a bit, bit not forever.
This morning I compared the resource and sleep data in my S7 to that in my gf’s Venu. The resource data is essentially useless and tells me nothing, the body battery has so much data regarding recovery, stress, HRV, etc and is genuinely useful. The sleep tracking in the Venu might not be as accurate as the S7, but it is more detailed. I would love that level of detail with the accuracy of the S7.

I am sure Suunto can achieve this level of detail as they clearly have the hardware and the expertise to do it.
If they can package this, along with external sensor support and adaptive training plans into a next gen S7 then I will be all over it.

Is that too much to ask?

[Brad_Olwin]

@olymay said in Suunto 7 Successor:

the body battery has so much data regarding recovery, stress, HRV, etc and is genuinely useful.

How is this useful? What are you going to do with the data? This is my point, there is already quite a bit of science questioning the value of HRV readings as a predictor. I frankly don’t see how this is useful.

I have a race in 2.5 weeks and workouts that I have planned as well as a short taper. Will those readings matter to me? No! My last two days have been very stressful, we had our first Nationally competitive agility dog become completely paralyzed overnight and had to euthanize him. Is that going to affect my stress? Absolutely, my sleep has not been great and I feel crappy. Will I do my workout? Yes! If I feel great during the workout that is good, if not I may cut it short. Will it matter? Will it affect my race performance? No!

Sorry but this is the point I keep trying to make, the “stuff and fluff” that most consumers want their devices to tell them is not going to help you get fit, lose weight or become more competitive. Those things require commitment and consistency where your daily “feeling and recovery” do not matter.
How YOU feel during your workout matters, not how the watch tells you how you feel. If you want to use HRV effectively, it is a bit more complicated.
https://medium.com/@altini_marco/on-heart-rate-variability-hrv-and-readiness-394a499ed05b
https://medium.com/@altini_marco/the-ultimate-guide-to-heart-rate-variability-hrv-part-4-909b52f71131

[A Former User]

@brad_olwin said in Suunto 7 Successor:

My last two days have been very stressful, we had our first Nationally competitive agility dog become completely paralyzed overnight and had to euthanize him.

I’m sorry for your loss. I feel you, four years ago I had to make the same decision

Regarding the “stuff and fluff” part, I fully agree.

[olymay]

@brad_olwin firstly, I am extremely sorry to hear about your dog. I am a big lover of dogs and had many in the family over the years, I fully understand how much of the family they become.

Stuff and fluff, I like stuff and fluff. And I even find it useful.

I am far from a seasoned athlete and have a long, long way to go before I can rely on my own knowledge and experience to make informed decisions, on my own, about my training.

I want the stuff and fluff mostly as a form of encouragement. So that I can track and see an improvement. Also, on the days when I don’t always feel like going for a run (which at the moment is most days) if the watch is telling me that I am fully charged and ready to go, then I will be more likely get off my ar$e and go.

The more I look into the details of my gf’s body battery from the Venu, the more I like it and the more I can see it is trustworthy. It has predicted her getting a cold 24-36 hours in advance. It reacted to her getting her Covid vaccine (all three of them, and the third was different due to it being a different manufacturer).

How will I use this? I like data and it gives me confidence that I am doing something and making progress. I also like to see the data on recovery and if I should leave it an extra day to rest my legs, or to man up and get out there.

I also want this data to be part of the adaptive training plan. If my last run pushed me a bit hard and my HR was too high, then it can tone it down. Or, if it was too easy then it can step it up slightly and push me a bit more.
If left to my own decisions I will either play it far too safe, or push far too hard (or, as is most likely, swing from one to the other).
I know a few people who have used the Garmin free coach and they all love it for training for a specific target. A number of them also follow the daily recommended runs it suggests and it works well for them (it takes into account the recovery state of your body and adapts accordingly).
I would love this on a Suunto watch.

In a perfect world, I would have a personal trainer who monitor sensors, track my progress, give me tips, plan my workouts, etc. But that is simply not going to happen.
An advanced watch is the closest I am going to get.
I want it to be a Suunto watch, so if they can release something soon (or at least make an announcement) then I will likely buy it.
I MUCH prefer the Suunto software experience to Garmin, and the forums are great (you guys are brilliant, seriously, a massive thank you) so I do not want to go anywhere.

Do I need it all? No. But much of it will definitely benefit me.

[Brad_Olwin]

@olymay said in Suunto 7 Successor:

The more I look into the details of my gf’s body battery from the Venu, the more I like it and the more I can see it is trustworthy. It has predicted her getting a cold 24-36 hours in advance. It reacted to her getting her Covid vaccine (all three of them, and the third was different due to it being a different manufacturer).

I believe this, these are big stressors and will show up when you become ill.

I also want this data to be part of the adaptive training plan. If my last run pushed me a bit hard and my HR was too high, then it can tone it down. Or, if it was too easy then it can step it up slightly and push me a bit more.
If left to my own decisions I will either play it far too safe, or push far too hard (or, as is most likely, swing from one to the other).
I know a few people who have used the Garmin free coach and they all love it for training for a specific target. A number of them also follow the daily recommended runs it suggests and it works well for them (it takes into account the recovery state of your body and adapts accordingly).
I would love this on a Suunto watch.

An adaptive training plan will not prepare you for racing ultras, in fact, I believe it will worsen your training for ultras. The plans I am aware of are geared toward marathons and shorter races, primarily to improve your pace, which is not going to help you get into ultras.
I’ve said enough here, and I’ve said it over and over again. I won’t comment on this again because what you are looking for from Garmin does not exist. Neither will it exist from Suunto if complex intervals and training plans from 3rd parties are brought to the watch.
There are TrainingPeaks plans that can get you into ultras, they are easy to follow and you do not need a watch to tell you do a 1.5h run today in high zone 1 or low zone 2…….Easy enough to simply do, consistency is what you need and you should not be pushing HR AFAIK given where you are in your training. If you are training above your AeT you are compromising your training.

You can also read this, from an athlete that does an incredible number of hours per year in multiple disciplines. He makes me look like a couch potato. See how he decides effort and recovery, then follow him on Strava and you will see it in action. He lives close by and I’ve bumped into him several times.
https://www.suunto.com/sports/News-Articles-container-page/how-to-mix-it-up-when-you-love-too-many-outdoor-sports/

[A Former User]

@brad_olwin said in Suunto 7 Successor:

I believe this, these are big stressors and will show up when you become ill.

very true.

[olymay]

@brad_olwin the reason I mention the body battery / recourses so much is that I want one that is accurate. The one on my S7 is honestly a novelty at best. It shows a % figure but then gives me very little data as to where it got that from. Yes, it tells me how much times was spent active/inactive/stressed/recovering, but not when any of that was. When something occurs is just as important as to if it occurred. I want to see if I am recovering enough during sleep, or the time sat at my computer working is recovery or stress.

Also, I have taken to completely ignoring the resource figure completely. For example, yesterday I felt great, but but the resource figure was pretty low at wake up (around 20%) and indicated I should be tired and run down. I still went for a 5km run in the afternoon, as I felt good.
Today, I feel like crap (despite getting a better sleep than the night before) yet the resource figure is much higher than yesterday (60% at wake up). I feel tired, and generally meh today (legs feel fine, so I doubt it’s from the short run).

I want a figure that works and tells me what, when, and why.

From what I have seen of the Garmin adaptive plan then it should work very well for me to train for any event, be it a 10K, a half, or an ultra. You can set all manner of parameters to tailor it.

Let’s not forget, the ultra that I want to do is 50km. Just 8km further than a marathon. A baby ultra if you will.
I am not looking to compete at multiday events, or do 100km, or further.
50km.
I have set myself a target of getting there by December this year which should be more than doable (I know three people last year that went from couch to marathon in 4-6 months for the London marathon last year).

I am not an elite athlete, nor do I want to be one. I don’t want to be running 50km every week. I want to do it once to prove that I can. And then, hopefully, maintain a decent level of fitness and distance after that. Maybe do another 50km in the future to batter my time?

Casual runner? Yes. Do I need an elite running watch? No.
But anything that helps me structure my training and adapts to my fitness and how I’m feeling is very much needed. Maybe in a few years when (if) I get enough experience then I will not need this help, but right now I do need this help.

Right now, I cannot follow a training peaks plan that requires me to run at a particular pace or HR, as it means I have to constantly check my watch during the run. This adds a level of stress I do not want or need. I run to relax and escape, worrying about checking my watch defeats that. However, a watch that notifies me if I’m going too fast or slow, or too hard or too easy takes away that worry and means I can just run.

Yesterday, I ran at a comfortable pace and barely looked at my watch. I loved it, had a great time. But upon reviewing the data it’s likely I pushed a bit too hard, if only the watch could have told me this during the run.

I don’t mind what watch does all of this for me (although I would love it to be a Suunto 7gen2) as long as it does everything I want. I’m happy to pay a premium. Change ecosystem. learn new software/hardware. Whatever it takes.

We do seem to have drifted quite a long way from the original topic of this post, and turned into my wish list for a S7gen2 and why I don’t need any of it

[Jamie BG]

@brad_olwin
I am not training for anything specific, so I am focusing on general health and slow overall increase to fitness, strength and stamina while trying to prevent injuries (due to heavy sport load from a kid to late twenties I have knee, back and some other complications - so have to be careful not to overstrain and injure myself). I find the Garmin system works well for general overall health and fitness.

I mainly focus on 7 Day load which works similar to the Training Peaks - i.e. get an idea of your overall fitness levels and whether increasing and decreasing, load focus (what to do & how intense) and Body Battery (how intense)

This isn’t going to work it you are training for something specifically, but for general fitness,
I find this works well and helps ensure I don’t injure myself (unfortunately doesn’t stop me doing something stupid and injuring myself that way - but at least it isn’t caused from over training) . Every morning before I workout I mainly look at:

1. 7 Day Load - am I in the optimal range, or about to drop out or go over - gives me an idea whether I need to up my activity, go a little bit easier or am I likely to up my optimal band (don’t want to push it too high too fast, am trying to focus on slow steady incremental gains (don’t want to pick up injuries or have too many drops and peaks). Or is it time to push to get the optimal band to move up.
2. I then look at my load focus - too much/too little low or high aerobic and or anaerobic; and in conjunction with 7DL decide what I will do for the day i.e. if I want to maintain, and low aerobic is out of range will look to do a walk or recovery/base run; or if high required will do a run/cycle/swim and focus intensity to ensure I work in HR zones 2-4 - depending on how much I want to 7DL trend; and if I need anaerobic depending and want to push up to next level then will do a Cardio/HIIT/Sprints etc.
3. Body Battery - will look at that and how I feel and then look at what I want to do. If its low and I feel low, I am not going to do an anearobic or high activity - will be a recovery exercise, most likely a walk.
4. Recovery (impacted by stress & sleep & activity) - will check to make sure if cleared if doing a high aerobic especially a VO2max and or anaerobic and see how I feel with BB and own impression.

Health:

1. Sleep - I suffer from obstructive APNEA (very very bad case, have to use a CPAP) - a quick look at my sleep, and pluse ox readings gives me a very good idea if I had an issue with my mask (sometimes the velcro slips and leaks so you may not get a good night sleep - when this happens sleep metrics and pluse ox show it straight away, and can confirm with CPAP machine readings (have to go into a website to see). First thing in the morning I will not feel it, but will by 2pm, so if I had a bad night, I don’t do anything intense so I can make it through the day without collapsing (in some ways I am still recoverying from chronic fatigue - official diagnoses due to lack of deep sleep for years - due to my Apnea).
2. BB - as stated use more for training; as my stress during day isn’t the best due to a variety of issues.
3. Stress - don’t really worry about it during the day - unless I get an alert in which case I do a breathing exercise which really helps. Otherwise use it more for what it is doing overnight - if really bad overnight I know my body is fighting something so I get a heads up that I may be coming down with something, so make sure I don’t do any intense activities that day so body can focus on fighting infection, flu, sinus, cold - whatever the issue is.
4. RHR - ave HR - if stress overnight is bad, then check these - if these are also outside of norm -then I know something is definitely on the way.
   [All 3 covid jabs have impacted Stress, RHR, Ave HR this way for numerous days, and have seen this with the one cold/sniffle I have had, and the one day I suffered from sinuses - due to CPAP machine I don’t wake up with sinus issue, it only comes in 30/40 mins after I take the mask off; and has even given me a headsup on a day I had really bad headaches; and a 24hr tummy bug —> so yes useful to know your day is about to be possibly ruined and to take it easy to give your body more energy to fight - plus can dose myself with honey and lemon- find that helps to reduce it).
5. I track my weight, steps, calories (integrates with MFP) including Carb, Fat and Protein (am jealous with that breakdown by activity that suunto now provides - would like to see that on Garmin).

So overall it has helped me become fitter, stronger, more stamina - hasn’t caused any injuries despite my dodgy backs and knees (my broken ribs was due to my stupidity not my training), and it has improved my sleep habits - improved when I go to sleep, how long I go to sleep and along with my CPAP mask improved my deep sleep (it is not easy to get used to sleeping with a CPAP mask - I am 19months in and it still feels very strange - I doubt it will ever become second nature). And while I haven’t lost a load of weight, I am not flabby and I have lost 2 inches on my waist and have had to buy t-shirts, shirts and jackets as my shoulders have extended yet again (fortunately managed to keep neck in check).

Looking back on 2021 compared to 2020 I more than doubled the distance and hours I have worked out, and managed to be active on 277 days despite being in pain for 2 months with broken ribs.
So while all the science may not be 100% right it is giving me the motivation and certainly seems to be working for as it does for loads of others.

Would it work for a serious athlete or someone training for a specific event - no, but there are still components they can use. Just like there are components that suunto provides that are very useable not matter what your purpose is.

[Jamie BG]

@olymay
“Right now, I cannot follow a training peaks plan that requires me to run at a particular pace or HR, as it means I have to constantly check my watch during the run. This adds a level of stress I do not want or need. I run to relax and escape, worrying about checking my watch defeats that. However, a watch that notifies me if I’m going too fast or slow, or too hard or too easy takes away that worry and means I can just run.”

And this is one of the things I love about my Garmin - you set up a workout and designate the target i.e. HR stay in zones 2-3. When you launch it you get an additional screen with your normal screens - a target screen which just shows a red, green, red gauge - so its easy to see when you are on target or off it, and if you set audio prompts and have a connected headset to your watch you will be told to increase when below target or decrease when above target - so you literally can just run without having to look at the watch. Find it super useful when focusing on cadence and or HR zones.

[lexterm77]

@jamie-bg

Out of curiosity I tried pro 80/20endurance hm training on TP and their pro maintenance training and in 10 years since I started training, I have never seen my HR go 30bpm or a 265W lap at 135bpm with 0% drift in 60minutes. Consistency, severe case of OCD and volume is essential.

[cosme.costa]

@jamie-bg IF works for you you should use it, more in your case that you have some pathologies and you have found a tool that help you to deal with them.

IMHO most of these features doesn’t give any or much value but well, its my opinion. I have changed my 7 field screen in the watch for a five field because I didn’t need to deal with more information while training or racing. I have a Garmin bike computer and some of the metrics aren’t useful at all some are a good idea but doesn’t work well or aren’t reliable.

You say that the watch helped you to be motivated but I think it is more involved to the body chemistry of doing exercise, to start doing exercise you need some motivation but once started with some consistency our body frees some hormones that helps us to keep up and continue doing exercise.

BTW, I do not know in the S7 but in the Spartan and S5/S9’s you can set targets (pace zones, HR zones, power zones), and the watch will tell you if you are over or under. You can also set time or distance targets and the watch will tell you when you have reached half of the target and the end of it.

[ChrisA]

@cosme-costa I agree with you and @Brad_Olwin, that it seems to be helpful to have real basic training foundation and a clear goal to make progress. I am a very inexperienced runner and can’t give any tips here, but I am a experienced martial arts practitioner and there it’s the same: novice students often come and want to do all the fancy kicks and techniques they see in the movies much too early. But while it’s ok also to try a difficult 360 degree kick or a knife disarm in the beginning , the main goal first is to stand rooted to the ground and do simple punches and straight low and medium kicks for quite some time, at least the first year as your main training part. And I don’t know about experienced runners, but I guess - and see in SA, that they too will do basic training and recovery as a reasonable part of their training as well as black belts in martial arts still train basic techniques regularly

[ChrisA]

@jamie-bg that’sthere on the Suunto too and IMO the best solution compared to the gauges of Garmin, Polar or Coros

and you can also set alarms for a certain HR zone and get notifications to slow down or run faster and - at least in my experience - I found the Suunto 9 better here reacting on HR changes than Garmin, where it always took some more time for the Fenix 6 to react to changes in HR.

[Brad_Olwin]

@cosme-costa Well said! And agree with you @ChrisA. I never show HR value in a screen, just use the outer ring to stay in the zone.

[lexterm77]

@brad_olwin

I got the book, reading since evening at about 1/3 finished. Book is excellent. I recommend reading to everyone before coming here to argue about anything. You do need base line training not only below aerobic threshold but some zone2-3 biology also

[Brad_Olwin]

@lexterm77 said in Suunto 7 Successor:

@brad_olwin

I got the book, reading since evening at about 1/3 finished. Book is excellent. I recommend reading to everyone before coming here to argue about anything. You do need base line training not only below aerobic threshold but some zone2-3 biology also

If your aerobic base is solid.

[lexterm77]

@brad_olwin said in Suunto 7 Successor:

@lexterm77 said in Suunto 7 Successor:

@brad_olwin

I got the book, reading since evening at about 1/3 finished. Book is excellent. I recommend reading to everyone before coming here to argue about anything. You do need base line training not only below aerobic threshold but some zone2-3 biology also

If your aerobic base is solid.

I meant Zone2-3 Biology course :laugh: you need to understand words author is saying to make sense of it.

[ChrisA]

@suzzlo said in Suunto 7 Successor:

Watches don’t run

That might become a similar epic „meme“ in the sportswatch area like Bruce Lee‘s „boards don’t hit back“ in martial arts