Suunto Race and openwater swimming
-
According to DCR, the Suunto Race is very bad for registering openwater swims. Do you agree?
-
@Yoeri-Nijs Not really. I’ve done quite some OW swims with the race. For me it’s quite accurate.
-
@Yoeri-Nijs I have very good results für open water swimming (I am regularly doing triathlons) with the current Suuntos.
If you are swimming a decent freestyle that involves lifting the arm above the surface every stroke, it will be very good. -
Sorry if I am hijacking the thread, but do optical HR watch sensors work with swimming, or a waterproof belt like Suunto’s are required for HR logging?
-
@mlakis said in Suunto Race and openwater swimming:
Sorry if I am hijacking the thread, but do optical HR watch sensors work with swimming, or a waterproof belt like Suunto’s are required for HR logging?
the sensor in the watch is working during swimming. Data quality may vary from user to user.
When swimming with a wetsuit, I am always using the belt (and the Suunto belt caches the HR data to sync later when out of the water).t6, S6, Elementum Terra, Ambit 3 Sapphire, Spartan Ultra Copper, Traverse Alpha, S7 Graphite LE, S9B Ambassador, S9P Granite Blue Titanium, S9PP Titanium Sand, Vertical All Black, Race Titanium Charcoal,
Race S All Black - TI Canary - Titanium Courtney -
The Bluetooth HR data catch up has mostly worked reliably in the simple openwater mode for me as well, but I have hit one strange bug in triathlon mode, already reported here: https://forum.suunto.com/topic/9484/hr-data-shifted-in-triathlon-mode
-
@Yoeri-Nijs I have seen this thread. Just to comment that DCR’s analysis was done before a GNSS firmware update . He is having issue with everything but Garmin, but there are other reports from other people speaking very well about both the SR and the SV.
I’m writing because after reading other opinions, I don’t find very honest those reviews about openwater swimming.
My guess is that is more about your technique swimming and how much and how long you are lifting your arm.
-
@dreamer_ it is both, on one side Suunto has still some issues in the water (but much improved with the new GPS hardware+firmware), on the other side if you swim regularly (and don’t have your watch underwater for a minute) it works well enough. But Ray’s swimming test includes some sections where he tread waters with the watch submerged, thus the Suunto debacle.
And BTW I think Suunto should improve also in this use case.Watch: Suunto Vertical Ti
Blog: isazi's home
-
@isazi I see. He also made an update in the SV review saying that the openwater GNSS test was much better after the update but not in the SR’s review.
There’s a very good review here (SV) https://www.correrunamaraton.com/suunto-vertical-opinion-review/ (in Spanish), with perfect openwater tracks (and I think that review was even done before the GNSS update of November) . The difference with Ray’s tests is very noticeable and that’s why I was thinking in that.
I can’t seem to find anything like this last review for the SR with the newer firmware though. But I understand the results should not differ so much between both watches.SV seems to have a bit better GNSS accuracy reports than the SR but I can’t see why a watch (SV) can have very good tracks in openwater and the other one a disaster (SR) when both are pretty similar in accuracy.
-
@isazi I have found a difference between SR and SV I didn’t knew about.
SV: 5 Satellite system connection (race limited to 4)
But why that limit? Perhaps this is an issue for the openwater accuracy and the little discrepancies between both models.
If both watches share the same Sony chipset, perhaps that thing is just a software thing that could be addressed in a firmware update. At the end the only difference should be Amoled vs (MIP and best battery) The target of users is different but both Suunto watches should have the best accuracy of the market (if possible).
-
maybe it’s a battery related choice
-
@sartoric good point. That limit is there for something. But after all these months we are also seeing that seems easy to get a 45 hours battery duration, instead of the 40 hours with multiband enabled.
And there’s also the fact that the SV seems to have better tracks, specially in openwater. Perhaps removing that lock it’s just an update of the firmware of the Sony chipset (I don’t know of course).
But with everything we know now, It seems pretty interesting if Suunto could remove that limit and see if we can get the perfect tracks and something like the openwater fix the SV has, and probably at very low cost.
Just debating about something we don’t know of course. Really interesting. -
Last week I had a triathlon race. The open water track from my SV looks very good and clean. I’m impressed. The difference in distance between offical and the watch was 50m (950m vs 900m(SV). I swam perfectly at the buoys, this time perfectly managed to shoot with navigation in the water.
-
@Maryn thanks for that report! In fact, similar as the review I posted about the SV. If you scroll down to openwater in that review, the accuracy is very good when using the SV.
In that half distance Ironman swim the Suunto Vertical registers 1.938 meters and the Garmin Forerunner 965, 1.914 meters.
There’s a difference of only 24 meters (to make an idea, that’s about a 25 meters pool in near 2 kilometers), and those meters depend also how you are swimming.
So perhaps 1.938 is more real and accurate than 1.914 in your swim. So, yes, really impressive the accuracy of the SV (and not really mediocre as others suggested in the past)So if Suunto has openwater fixed for the SV and they share the same GNSS chipset in the Race, there should be a fix for the SR.
The SR seems to report a bit less accurate tracks (when not openwater) and even worse when openwater.And there’s also that lock in the Race we were talking about…
-
@dreamer_ did you check the race with current SW?
-
@Maryn I have the SV but I’m also interested in the SR. The thing is that SR’s aacuracy reports are not as good as SV’s, specially when openwater. I understand the reports are better than some reviewers said in the past, but not as good as SV’s reports.
I don’t know, of course. But there’s something there that makes accuracy different between both watches.
-
By the way did you try to use the polar verity sense close the SV during swim (under the swim suit)? I wonder if it will work in water because of the extra BT antenna used in verity sense. Then you can have pretty good HR accuracy during swim
-
@Maryn I don’t have the verity sense but I have a Polar H10, a Garmin HRM Tri (both chest straps) and a Coospo HW9 arm band. The Coospo band is a 20$ arm band that has very nice reviews (comparable to the Polar Verity Sense https://www.correrunamaraton.com/coospo-hw9-review-opinion/?utm_content=cmp-true ). I can highly recommend this arm band for running, but is not valid for swimming.
The thing is that BT does not work underwater. The Polar H10 has memory to sync the HR data after the activity but it does only work inside the Polar ecosystem or with Polar Flow. And that means that you end having the activity in the Suunto App and the HR in Polar Flow. So if you don’t have a Polar watch, you need a chest strap that is compatable with the brand you are using.
So,as far as I know, the only way to have good HR data using a Suunto watch, is with the Suunto chest strap (which I don’t own)
-
@sartoric @isazi @Maryn I was wrong with my assumptions about the simultaneous satellite systems. It seems there’s a correction at Suunto’s web site:
I have seen reviews like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4OK9-jUwZA&t=714s
Where there are differences in that number:
But it does not seem true (at this moment). At least in the Spanish site.
-
@Egika sorry for the mention. It’s just I have read you swim a lot in other posts and I think you have very good experience here. Do you have reports of SR vs SV’s accuracy? Something we can see. It’s just there’s nothing but DCR’s review (outdated, since lasts firmware updates) and I think It’s good to know about SR’s accuracy on openwater.
Thanks
