Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    OHR accuracy of owners of Race 2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto Race 2
    45 Posts 20 Posters 4.4k Views 18 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M Offline
      Matteiva @Gunnar
      last edited by Matteiva

      @Gunnar šŸ™‚ yes I remember it was almost 10 bits above my real heart rate, but race 2 was 25/30 yesterday evening, during all my activity šŸ™‚

      And garmin epix pro 2 was spot on most of the time, same type of band same personn ( me ! )

      Hoping a fix soon

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        jsmno
        last edited by

        Hi everyone. I am new to this forum. And I am the owner of my first Suunto device.
        I really like the Race 2. They have a nice weight, a nice large display, and easy control with the digital crown.
        What I am disappointed with is the quality of the OHR measurement. Today I had a light running workout in zone 1-2 during which I can breathe through my nose easily. From the chest strap I know that at this pace my heart rate is around 130-140. I ran downhill and my heart rate was 164-172. This is the heart rate I get during interval training!
        I feel like my old Garmin Fenix ​​6 pro was more accurate. I know that OHR can’t record sudden changes in pace, but at the same pace it measures 20-30 beats more. I really don’t understand this and I’m afraid it’s more of a hardware issue than a software one.
        I have white skin. Original suunto textile strap. Tight enough.

        I have an ultramarathon coming up this weekend and I’m angry that I can’t rely on the watch. I don’t feel like wearing a chest strap for 100km…

        VoiGASV Brad_OlwinB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • VoiGASV Online
          VoiGAS Silver Members @jsmno
          last edited by

          @jsmno Unfortunatly Downhill the watches OHR have problems with ā€œcadence lockā€ because it believes the movements are your heartbeat…
          But as far as I know all manufacturers have this problem, interesting to hear that Garmin seems to be better in this aspect


          Race S
          Ambit3 Vertical

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            Matteiva @VoiGAS
            last edited by

            @VoiGAS there is absolutaly no doubt that garmin since fenix 6 has good ohr. Tested race 2 for few more runs this week, even shaving the skin, measures still a total disaster.

            Jean-Philippe REYJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • Jean-Philippe REYJ Offline
              Jean-Philippe REY @Matteiva
              last edited by

              @Matteiva I also shave m’y wrist ,🤣 but the result was not effective.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Brad_OlwinB Offline
                Brad_Olwin Moderator @jsmno
                last edited by

                @jsmno OHR on any watch for me is problematic. I’ve tried most of them. Because ZoneSense is so useful I use the Suunto belt most of the time and when running ultra races. I think OHR is highly variable based on individuals because of the underlying technology.

                Vector/T6c/Ambit 3 Peak/S5 Copper/S3/S7 Ti/S9 baro Ti/S9P Ti/S9PP Ti/Vertical Ti/Race Ti/RaceS/Ocean/Wing/Race2Ti

                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                • S Offline
                  Shrek3k @Brad_Olwin
                  last edited by

                  @Brad_Olwin fully agree, OHR for me is always spot on with Vertical 1 with the velcro-band and a quite tight fit.

                  using a Suunto Vertical & Suunto Wings; mostly running (AKA stomping around) and cycling through the northern german "wilderness", and wherever else I have the chance to do so
                  OS - Android 16/Pixel Pro 7

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • L Offline
                    larrybbaker
                    last edited by larrybbaker

                    3 days now with Race 2. OHR seems very accurate in 24x7, walking and a 30 minute Zwift ride today.

                    SV Solar
                    iPhone 16 Pro

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • M Offline
                      Matteiva
                      last edited by

                      I am starting to think that some Race 2 got OHR problems, software or hardware ?

                      I ran a first and perfect 10k with a fresh new Vertical 2, spot on from start to finish, with the same nylon stretch band than Race 2, same individual.

                      For reminder, for me with this Race 2
                      8k 5:35mn/km 160 average most often 165/170
                      Then
                      8k 4:43mn/km 138 average with some 120 at 4:00mn/k

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Tomas5T Offline
                        Tomas5 Gold Members
                        last edited by

                        Here is comparison of Suunto 5 (with Suunto Smart Sensor) vs Suunto Race 2 (OHR). I had Race 2 tight enough but still comfortible. It is possible to tighten it one hole more but than it is not comfortable to wear anymore.
                        amCharts.png

                        Suunto Ambit 2, Suunto 5, Suunto Race 2

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy