Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto 9
    20 Posts 7 Posters 1.2k Views 8 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • karel loudaK Offline
      karel louda Bronze Member @Audaxjoe
      last edited by

      @Audaxjoe
      Why do you switch to Suunto, and why you would’t go back? Yet, I test both (Suunto 9 and Fenix 5), but in a week i will one (or both) give back. They are both very different watches.

      AudaxjoeA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Martin HäntzschelM Offline
        Martin Häntzschel @stromdiddily
        last edited by Martin Häntzschel

        @stromdiddily said in S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis:

        Fascinating thread!

        I don’t train to that level of ascent/descent precision but am not sure you’ll find anything more accurate for total ascents and distance than what you have.

        I WILL say that running side by side w an A3P and an S9 the S9 is slower to show ascent values on the display. They will however typically match up in the end.

        @stromdiddily The thing is that going up and down the small hills where I train, due to the threshold the Suunto 9 Baro has, it doesn’t actually count the ascent meters, while the Fenix and the A3P do count them.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Martin HäntzschelM Offline
          Martin Häntzschel @Audaxjoe
          last edited by

          @Audaxjoe I don’t doubt the S9 Baro is a great watch, but for training in the small hill where I train, I need a device to count the ascent meters. Due to the threshold, the S9 Baro doesn’t do the job sadly.

          Brad_OlwinB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Brad_OlwinB Offline
            Brad_Olwin Moderator @Martin Häntzschel
            last edited by

            @Martin-Häntzschel said in S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis:

            @Audaxjoe I don’t doubt the S9 Baro is a great watch, but for training in the small hill where I train, I need a device to count the ascent meters. Due to the threshold, the S9 Baro doesn’t do the job sadly.

            Why don’t you try the nonbaro model? That should work and has all of the same features.

            Vector/T6c/Ambit 3 Peak/S5 Copper/S3/S7 Ti/S9 baro Ti/S9P Ti/S9PP Ti/Vertical Ti/Race Ti/RaceS/Ocean/Wing

            Martin HäntzschelM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Martin HäntzschelM Offline
              Martin Häntzschel @Brad_Olwin
              last edited by

              @Brad_Olwin said in S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis:

              Why don’t you try the nonbaro model? That should work and has all of the same features.

              Hi Brad, the thing with a nonbaro watch is that those track ascent with GPS, and it’d be the same as with my old Garmin 735xt or any other watch without barometric altimeter, they don’t track ascents and decents correctly.

              Brad_OlwinB Dimitrios KanellopoulosD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Brad_OlwinB Offline
                Brad_Olwin Moderator @Martin Häntzschel
                last edited by

                @Martin-Häntzschel said in S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis:

                @Brad_Olwin said in S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis:

                Why don’t you try the nonbaro model? That should work and has all of the same features.

                Hi Brad, the thing with a nonbaro watch is that those track ascent with GPS, and it’d be the same as with my old Garmin 735xt or any other watch without barometric altimeter, they don’t track ascents and decents correctly.

                It is better than you think, and it might be good enough for what you need. I have not tried it on small hills. For me, it is not as accurate as the baro model but it does a good job.

                Vector/T6c/Ambit 3 Peak/S5 Copper/S3/S7 Ti/S9 baro Ti/S9P Ti/S9PP Ti/Vertical Ti/Race Ti/RaceS/Ocean/Wing

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
                  Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager @Martin Häntzschel
                  last edited by

                  @Martin-Häntzschel Would you be so kind to share a file with me in private?
                  I would prefer a fit file from Strava if possible.

                  You can do that via going to your strava web , then finding the activity and then appending at the end of it /export_original . That will download the original file, including some raw watch data that I can look into. If A3 works better on this Ill be damned but I can create then a case.

                  Example:

                  Strava activity link: https://www.strava.com/activities/2196586907
                  Getting the fit file: https://www.strava.com/activities/2196586907/export_original

                  PS. You can pm me or if privacy is concerned , it’s ok I suppose then.

                  Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
                  Creator of Quantified-Self.io
                  youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                  https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                  https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

                  Martin HäntzschelM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Martin HäntzschelM Offline
                    Martin Häntzschel @Dimitrios Kanellopoulos
                    last edited by Martin Häntzschel

                    @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos Evening_Run.fit https://www.strava.com/activities/2207527271
                    Morning_Run.fit https://www.strava.com/activities/2201309099/

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • AudaxjoeA Offline
                      Audaxjoe @karel louda
                      last edited by

                      @karel-louda said in S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis:

                      @Audaxjoe
                      Why do you switch to Suunto, and why you would’t go back? Yet, I test both (Suunto 9 and Fenix 5), but in a week i will one (or both) give back. They are both very different watches.

                      I switched as I kept getting faulty Fenix 5s. The altimeter was so erratic is was funny. And the battery life was also pants, like draining around 5-8% an hour in watch mode. The barometer and battery problems are well documented in the Garmin Forums and the barometer has been a nightmare since the Fenix 3 HR - it would drift from my house (about 20 meters above sea level) to show a reading of 8000+ meters then dive to -5000 meters in about 20 minutes…

                      I tried the Suunto 9 Baro and although it has far less features than the Garmin, what it does it does very well and the battery is exceptional. Having got used to the Suunto I wouldn’t go back to the Fenix. My missus has a Fenix 5s and that has been solid.

                      My Suunto also gives very conservative climbing figures. I use a Garmin Etrex sometimes for navigation on a bike, if I say go for a ride and the Etrex says 1200 mtrs climbing the Suunto will give about 700 meters and if I press elevation correction on Strava it is about in the middle! My Fenix 5 and my partners 5s also provide low readings.

                      Both are lovely watches. And the smart watch features on the Garmin are altogether better.

                      Enjoy what ever you choose, remember both are just tools (some may say toys…) what is important is getting out there
                      and enjoying the run/ride/swim/hike 🙂

                      Suunto Vertical
                      Suunto 9 BARO
                      Garmin Fenix 3, 5
                      Suunto Vector

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                      • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
                        Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager
                        last edited by

                        I took a look at your file I cannot see anything really bad

                        https://quantified-self.io/user/1sfdpFEiLEgW0jzpVaHyoqMnwdE2/event/Go7ANjEEF5kRyozb3Epu

                        You get 449 ascent for going up and down about 50 times .

                        amCharts.png

                        Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
                        Creator of Quantified-Self.io
                        youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                        https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                        https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

                        Martin HäntzschelM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Martin HäntzschelM Offline
                          Martin Häntzschel @Dimitrios Kanellopoulos
                          last edited by

                          @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos Great analysis Dimitrios, thanks! So in those hills, it works.

                          I didn know about quantified-seld.io, great tool!

                          So I just uploaded the other file I shared in my post above, https://quantified-self.io/user/UAKIzFErHIOQXJS2koLu7No1W602/event/pTImHZ8ZGVokcICHf3a4
                          You can see that I did 5 1km intervals going up and down the 4m hills you can see in picture 1 here https://imgur.com/a/IiGhp1G.
                          So I went up and down around 22 times each interval. 22 * 5 * 4 gives me 440 ascent meters, but the watch tracked 124 ascent meters. Is it due to the threshold?

                          Dimitrios KanellopoulosD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
                            Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager @Martin Häntzschel
                            last edited by Dimitrios Kanellopoulos

                            @Martin-Häntzschel I think so pal.

                            Take a look I zoomed in on the first interval.

                            The avg diff is really on the boundaries of 3m.
                            Screenshot 2019-03-18 at 21.56.11.png
                            Screenshot 2019-03-18 at 21.49.51.png Screenshot 2019-03-18 at 21.49.34.png
                            Screenshot 2019-03-18 at 21.52.37.png

                            So it’s not that the watch does not record those, but rather it sums it up with a threshold.

                            That is what I think but yeah it might not suit you, understandable 🙂 Cool

                            Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
                            Creator of Quantified-Self.io
                            youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                            https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                            https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

                            Martin HäntzschelM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • Martin HäntzschelM Offline
                              Martin Häntzschel @Dimitrios Kanellopoulos
                              last edited by

                              @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos yep, saw that, so well, with this watch, due to the 3m threshold, Suunto Baro 9 doesn’t count those ascents. I wrote to support@suunto.com about this, and also I’m gonna get a Fenix 5 fit file to compare.

                              Thanks again buddy.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • First post
                                Last post

                              Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy