Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto 9
    20 Posts 7 Posters 1.2k Views 8 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Martin HäntzschelM Offline
      Martin Häntzschel @stromdiddily
      last edited by Martin Häntzschel

      @stromdiddily said in S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis:

      Fascinating thread!

      I don’t train to that level of ascent/descent precision but am not sure you’ll find anything more accurate for total ascents and distance than what you have.

      I WILL say that running side by side w an A3P and an S9 the S9 is slower to show ascent values on the display. They will however typically match up in the end.

      @stromdiddily The thing is that going up and down the small hills where I train, due to the threshold the Suunto 9 Baro has, it doesn’t actually count the ascent meters, while the Fenix and the A3P do count them.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Martin HäntzschelM Offline
        Martin Häntzschel @Audaxjoe
        last edited by

        @Audaxjoe I don’t doubt the S9 Baro is a great watch, but for training in the small hill where I train, I need a device to count the ascent meters. Due to the threshold, the S9 Baro doesn’t do the job sadly.

        Brad_OlwinB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Brad_OlwinB Offline
          Brad_Olwin Moderator @Martin Häntzschel
          last edited by

          @Martin-Häntzschel said in S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis:

          @Audaxjoe I don’t doubt the S9 Baro is a great watch, but for training in the small hill where I train, I need a device to count the ascent meters. Due to the threshold, the S9 Baro doesn’t do the job sadly.

          Why don’t you try the nonbaro model? That should work and has all of the same features.

          Vector/T6c/Ambit 3 Peak/S5 Copper/S3/S7 Ti/S9 baro Ti/S9P Ti/S9PP Ti/Vertical Ti/Race Ti/RaceS/Ocean/Wing

          Martin HäntzschelM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Martin HäntzschelM Offline
            Martin Häntzschel @Brad_Olwin
            last edited by

            @Brad_Olwin said in S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis:

            Why don’t you try the nonbaro model? That should work and has all of the same features.

            Hi Brad, the thing with a nonbaro watch is that those track ascent with GPS, and it’d be the same as with my old Garmin 735xt or any other watch without barometric altimeter, they don’t track ascents and decents correctly.

            Brad_OlwinB Dimitrios KanellopoulosD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • Brad_OlwinB Offline
              Brad_Olwin Moderator @Martin Häntzschel
              last edited by

              @Martin-Häntzschel said in S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis:

              @Brad_Olwin said in S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis:

              Why don’t you try the nonbaro model? That should work and has all of the same features.

              Hi Brad, the thing with a nonbaro watch is that those track ascent with GPS, and it’d be the same as with my old Garmin 735xt or any other watch without barometric altimeter, they don’t track ascents and decents correctly.

              It is better than you think, and it might be good enough for what you need. I have not tried it on small hills. For me, it is not as accurate as the baro model but it does a good job.

              Vector/T6c/Ambit 3 Peak/S5 Copper/S3/S7 Ti/S9 baro Ti/S9P Ti/S9PP Ti/Vertical Ti/Race Ti/RaceS/Ocean/Wing

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
                Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager @Martin Häntzschel
                last edited by

                @Martin-Häntzschel Would you be so kind to share a file with me in private?
                I would prefer a fit file from Strava if possible.

                You can do that via going to your strava web , then finding the activity and then appending at the end of it /export_original . That will download the original file, including some raw watch data that I can look into. If A3 works better on this Ill be damned but I can create then a case.

                Example:

                Strava activity link: https://www.strava.com/activities/2196586907
                Getting the fit file: https://www.strava.com/activities/2196586907/export_original

                PS. You can pm me or if privacy is concerned , it’s ok I suppose then.

                Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
                Creator of Quantified-Self.io
                youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

                Martin HäntzschelM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Martin HäntzschelM Offline
                  Martin Häntzschel @Dimitrios Kanellopoulos
                  last edited by Martin Häntzschel

                  @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos Evening_Run.fit https://www.strava.com/activities/2207527271
                  Morning_Run.fit https://www.strava.com/activities/2201309099/

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • AudaxjoeA Offline
                    Audaxjoe @karel louda
                    last edited by

                    @karel-louda said in S9 Baro - Going to return/sell due to following analysis:

                    @Audaxjoe
                    Why do you switch to Suunto, and why you would’t go back? Yet, I test both (Suunto 9 and Fenix 5), but in a week i will one (or both) give back. They are both very different watches.

                    I switched as I kept getting faulty Fenix 5s. The altimeter was so erratic is was funny. And the battery life was also pants, like draining around 5-8% an hour in watch mode. The barometer and battery problems are well documented in the Garmin Forums and the barometer has been a nightmare since the Fenix 3 HR - it would drift from my house (about 20 meters above sea level) to show a reading of 8000+ meters then dive to -5000 meters in about 20 minutes…

                    I tried the Suunto 9 Baro and although it has far less features than the Garmin, what it does it does very well and the battery is exceptional. Having got used to the Suunto I wouldn’t go back to the Fenix. My missus has a Fenix 5s and that has been solid.

                    My Suunto also gives very conservative climbing figures. I use a Garmin Etrex sometimes for navigation on a bike, if I say go for a ride and the Etrex says 1200 mtrs climbing the Suunto will give about 700 meters and if I press elevation correction on Strava it is about in the middle! My Fenix 5 and my partners 5s also provide low readings.

                    Both are lovely watches. And the smart watch features on the Garmin are altogether better.

                    Enjoy what ever you choose, remember both are just tools (some may say toys…) what is important is getting out there
                    and enjoying the run/ride/swim/hike 🙂

                    Suunto Vertical
                    Suunto 9 BARO
                    Garmin Fenix 3, 5
                    Suunto Vector

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                    • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
                      Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager
                      last edited by

                      I took a look at your file I cannot see anything really bad

                      https://quantified-self.io/user/1sfdpFEiLEgW0jzpVaHyoqMnwdE2/event/Go7ANjEEF5kRyozb3Epu

                      You get 449 ascent for going up and down about 50 times .

                      amCharts.png

                      Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
                      Creator of Quantified-Self.io
                      youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                      https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                      https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

                      Martin HäntzschelM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Martin HäntzschelM Offline
                        Martin Häntzschel @Dimitrios Kanellopoulos
                        last edited by

                        @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos Great analysis Dimitrios, thanks! So in those hills, it works.

                        I didn know about quantified-seld.io, great tool!

                        So I just uploaded the other file I shared in my post above, https://quantified-self.io/user/UAKIzFErHIOQXJS2koLu7No1W602/event/pTImHZ8ZGVokcICHf3a4
                        You can see that I did 5 1km intervals going up and down the 4m hills you can see in picture 1 here https://imgur.com/a/IiGhp1G.
                        So I went up and down around 22 times each interval. 22 * 5 * 4 gives me 440 ascent meters, but the watch tracked 124 ascent meters. Is it due to the threshold?

                        Dimitrios KanellopoulosD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
                          Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager @Martin Häntzschel
                          last edited by Dimitrios Kanellopoulos

                          @Martin-Häntzschel I think so pal.

                          Take a look I zoomed in on the first interval.

                          The avg diff is really on the boundaries of 3m.
                          Screenshot 2019-03-18 at 21.56.11.png
                          Screenshot 2019-03-18 at 21.49.51.png Screenshot 2019-03-18 at 21.49.34.png
                          Screenshot 2019-03-18 at 21.52.37.png

                          So it’s not that the watch does not record those, but rather it sums it up with a threshold.

                          That is what I think but yeah it might not suit you, understandable 🙂 Cool

                          Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
                          Creator of Quantified-Self.io
                          youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                          https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                          https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

                          Martin HäntzschelM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • Martin HäntzschelM Offline
                            Martin Häntzschel @Dimitrios Kanellopoulos
                            last edited by

                            @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos yep, saw that, so well, with this watch, due to the 3m threshold, Suunto Baro 9 doesn’t count those ascents. I wrote to support@suunto.com about this, and also I’m gonna get a Fenix 5 fit file to compare.

                            Thanks again buddy.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • First post
                              Last post

                            Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy