Suunto 7

[freeheeler]

@Luís-Pinto
a customer is positive surprised if he finds a feature that is useful but was not announced very obvious.
On the other hand they are disappointed if they expect something that is not there or takes time to come.

[___Alejandro___]

@jean-william-cousin Errrr, hold on there sir! I’m tempted by the Suunto 7 and yet, strangely, I don’t feel insulted… Actually, I find fejker’s comments (or “rants and whining” as some of the eager beavers around ‘ere call them) quite refreshing in a ‘much-needed-opposite-polarity’ kind of way, and I think we need that in a forum like this. Helps us stay objective. Oh, wait, you’re not an instagram chick are you!? (I’m just teasing, okay?!)

[jw cou]

@Alejandro yeah you’re right… I do love this forum because there are very different points of view, facts based discussions. And I’m very happy to read any pros or cons someone has to share and why a watch / app may or may not fit one’s needs.
But sometimes (rarely) it slightly slides into the “I know the absolute truth and you’re dumb if you don’t think like me” aka Facebook/Twitter discussions, and that’s where I get bored! I guess the instagram chick was a bit too much for me, just after taking the risk of investing 500$ into a watch not thoroughly tested yet But nothing agqainst @fejker of course, I do appreciate all the facts these experienced guys are sharing, especially because I am not as experienced in sports / wearables.

[sartoric]

It will be veeeery interesting to see, in a week or so, some figures about pre-order.

[___Alejandro___]

@jean-william-cousin Did you just pony up 500 for the 7?! I salute your courage and offer you my hearty congratulations! Tempting as it is for me, I think I’ll sit this one out. Got burned a bit with the SSU, so not feeling the pioneering spirit on this one – you know, “Fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me, etc, etc…”
Well! Expert or not, I’m looking forward to any interesting revelations from a real-world paying customer, such as your good self. All the best!

[jw cou]

@Alejandro I was an early adopter of the SSU too, so as a great philosopher once said, oops I did it again.
I like testing new stuff and understand/accept the consequences (which includes eating pasta for 3 months), it may be a disease.

And I’ll of course happily share my findings

[Brad_Olwin]

@Luís-Pinto The features are clearly provided in the manual and information on the Suunto site. Since this watch is not aimed at Suunto’s base core but more at the S3F user, it may not get the features that some are hoping would come. I too would like to see a roadmap, unfortunately that did not work out well for Suunto as I experienced. Certainly for planned features, some future notification would be helpful.

[A Former User]

@Brad_Olwin said in Suunto 7:

@Luís-Pinto Since this watch is not aimed at Suunto’s base core but more at the S3F user,

Agreed. And yet S3F has all FirstBeat metrics more hardcore watches have, support for external sensors beyond heart rate, and even unofficial support for running power.

[isazi]

@jean-william-cousin I would gladly eat pasta every day

[A Former User]

@jean-william-cousin said in Suunto 7:

@Alejandro I was an early adopter of the SSU too, so as a great philosopher once said, oops I did it again.

I have been honestly investigating Google Fit and WearOS side of the equation ever since S7 surprise announcement. While the jury is still out, the early evidence presented to the court is really-really promising. I think S7 might be the first smartwatch that ticks all the right boxes for me in terms of design, hardware specs, and features, and it might be the second smartwatch ever with real sports chops, period. The first one being Polar M600, peace be upon it. Amen!

My only gripe is that without external sensors and intervals, I would still need another real watch to drive majority of my training. Still, a capable daily driver that can capture easy runs outside, recovery spin bikes/rowing, mobility drills/stretching, minor hikes and walks is pretty big in my book.

[A Former User]

@isazi Can’t eat pasta for three months, let alone everyday… So I’ll probably drop breakfast and swap dinner for protein shake

(I’m sure soon we are going to see a headline on Engadget and Gizmodo “Broke Suunto fans starve to get S7”…)

[Dimitrios Kanellopoulos]

@NickK if you use Google fit you will be pleased a lot. SA syncs to Google Fit (the watch SA) and other apps like Sleep for Android can push also sleep to FIT. Now the watch can be used with the Sleep for Android app to aggregate data as Sleep for Android bases also on Mic etc. Google fit also does 24/7 HR monitoring and gives an important metric, rest HR.

For the Apple health kit etc people I have no clue…

Also Steps are not synced to the Suunto app. I dont know if Suunto app will pull them eventually from Google Fit but it has been decided that Google Fit will / should provide the step count , meaning, that they do have a “context” engine for removing invalid steps.

I hope this helps.

[A Former User]

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos Thank you! I haven’t used Google Fit in a long-long while. Was pleasantly surprised by the redesigned version. I’d say it’s a combined and streamlined version of iOS Health and Activity apps. It doesn’t try to be everything for everyone, i.e. it’s not health vault with all stats under the sun. But it does have the basics people typically want to track and it does a lot of smart things presentation wise.

I think on Android where Fit is native, S7 could be a hit.

iPhone is a different story. On one hand, WearOS there is a second class citizen due to iOS limitations and Google’s lack of focus. On the other, S7 would probably have to write to Health too, because that’s where iPhone people would expect to find the data. There’s Google Fit version for iOS, but I doubt many people know it exists.

[Bulkan]

@jorgefd78 don’t live in the past, live in the present.

[Bulkan]

@Brad_Olwin f

I agree with you. I understand people always want what they desire but this watch is pointing to a new niche for Suunto.

For me the lack of tracking in Suunto app and the lack of support of Stryd push me away from buying it.

But Suunto is delivering and amazing screen, hardware and it fits for non ultra athletes.

I could be rich if I’ve received 1 dollar each time since the launch of the first (disaster) Apple Watch when people said “If Suunto would launched a smart watch with their hardware…” Well here it is the first version. I love it.

[Bulkan]

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos said in Suunto 7:

@NickK if you use Google fit you will be pleased a lot. SA syncs to Google Fit (the watch SA) and o, (…)

For the Apple health kit etc people I have no clue…

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos where and how do I have to go, write, send a video, climb, downhill or whatever to get to suunto use Applehealthkit in order to track the sleep time?

I will do it.

[azeanic]

@dulko79 A friend of mine just purchased the Amazfit Stratos 3. He said it was pretty good. User interface was alot better than he expected.

[A Former User]

@azeanic It is refreshing to see a properly rendered pace graph and a cadence graph that shows steps per minute rather than RPM. It is also refreshing to see HR graph which isn’t in zone 5 most of the time like most of HR graphs recorded with optical sensor on S9B.

[Dimitrios Kanellopoulos]

@silentvoyager we dont do steps per minute in Suunto. Cadence is from one foot measured anyways and all services and normal unit is RPM not steps. All files and protocols use RPM (Revolutions per minute)

I know you want else but thanks

[Shrek3k]

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos said in Suunto 7:

@silentvoyager we dont do steps per minute in Suunto. Cadence is from one foot measured anyways and all services and normal unit is RPM not steps. All files and protocols use RPM (Revolutions per minute)

I know you want else but thanks

Absolutely no issue for me, as I am really able to double the number in order to compare it with other statistics and this number is one that does not concern me that much … nevertheless even Stryd uses steps per minute, obviously using one sensor / pod on one foot …
But as the values of spm from Stryd differ from the (even when doubled) rpm I prefer to rely on Stryd.