Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    5K effort won't burn any fat? O_o

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto 9 Peak
    74 Posts 19 Posters 5.3k Views 18 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • isaziI Offline
      isazi Moderator @lexterm77
      last edited by

      @lexterm77 yeah I read fat instead of carb, sorry 😂

      Watch: Suunto Vertical Ti

      Blog: isazi's home

      lexterm77L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • lexterm77L Offline
        lexterm77 Bronze Member @isazi
        last edited by

        @isazi

        turns out 5.5cal per gram of carbs, very strange 😆

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • zhang965Z Offline
          zhang965
          last edited by

          Screenshot_20211019-231700.jpg Screenshot_20211019-231655.jpg

          1g fat
          60 g crarbs

          Winners Wear Winners

          herlasH 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • herlasH Offline
            herlas Silver Members @zhang965
            last edited by

            @zhang965 those HR zones seem wrong right? 179 green ? 🙂

            SRS Ti
            A3P (drill mode for pool swimming 🤦🤷)
            Galaxy Z Flip 3 / Galaxy S24+

            zhang965Z 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • zhang965Z Offline
              zhang965 @herlas
              last edited by

              @herlas said in 5K effort won't burn any fat? O_o:

              @zhang965 those HR zones seem wrong right? 179 green ? 🙂

              180 185 is my zone 3
              186 196 is z4
              Beyond 196 z5

              I did the test in a lab

              Winners Wear Winners

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • zhang965Z Offline
                zhang965
                last edited by zhang965

                Screenshot_20211024-104616.jpg Screenshot_20211024-104611.jpg

                so we had:

                1(fat)+60(carbs)=297 (my last 5k résultat)
                3(fat)+103(carbs)=574 (this 10k)

                than fat = 50, carbs =4 …

                Winners Wear Winners

                lexterm77L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • lexterm77L Offline
                  lexterm77 Bronze Member @zhang965
                  last edited by

                  so we had:

                  1(fat)+60(carbs)=297 (my last 5k résultat)
                  3(fat)+103(carbs)=574 (this 10k)

                  than fat = 50, carbs =4 …

                  Fat is 8.8cal/g, rest is Lithium Ion

                  zhang965Z 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • zhang965Z Offline
                    zhang965 @lexterm77
                    last edited by

                    @lexterm77 said in 5K effort won't burn any fat? O_o:

                    so we had:

                    1(fat)+60(carbs)=297 (my last 5k résultat)
                    3(fat)+103(carbs)=574 (this 10k)

                    than fat = 50, carbs =4 …

                    Fat is 8.8cal/g, rest is Lithium Ion

                    ah ok ,so I got 5.5 cal/g carbs

                    Winners Wear Winners

                    lexterm77L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • lexterm77L Offline
                      lexterm77 Bronze Member @zhang965
                      last edited by

                      @zhang965

                      Burner appears to exclude anaerobic portion while calorie data does not. I am not sure but someone can confirm.

                      isaziI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • isaziI Offline
                        isazi Moderator @lexterm77
                        last edited by

                        @lexterm77 now that you say so, I think calories does also include the metabolic calories, so maybe burner only looks at the activity. Could this be the reason?

                        Watch: Suunto Vertical Ti

                        Blog: isazi's home

                        lexterm77L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • lexterm77L Offline
                          lexterm77 Bronze Member @isazi
                          last edited by lexterm77

                          @isazi

                          On Long walks burner is closer to calorie counter (50cal missing) vs running (progression runs z3-z5 intervals) (130cal missing) discrepancies would increase as time progresses. This is what I thought but data point to something else (hinting at anaerobic)

                          55min interval 905cal 156g carb 17g fat (770cal in burner)
                          130cal missing (2.36cal per minute)

                          90min walk 881cal 119g carb 40g fat (828cal in burner)
                          50cal missing (0.55 cal per minute)

                          97min trail run easy 1322cal 233g carb 43g fat (1310cal in burner) this one is accurate

                          Dimitrios KanellopoulosD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
                            Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager @lexterm77
                            last edited by

                            @lexterm77 guys keep in mind the passive calories. They are counted for the workout but should not count for the burner

                            Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
                            Creator of Quantified-Self.io
                            youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                            https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                            https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

                            lexterm77L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • lexterm77L Offline
                              lexterm77 Bronze Member @Dimitrios Kanellopoulos
                              last edited by

                              @dimitrios-kanellopoulos

                              Basal metabolism == passive calories.

                              lexterm77L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • lexterm77L Offline
                                lexterm77 Bronze Member @lexterm77
                                last edited by

                                Found out what it is, sometimes it does not calculate last chunk, hence the missing carbs/fat.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • zhang965Z Offline
                                  zhang965
                                  last edited by

                                  Screenshot_20211124-174302.jpg Screenshot_20211124-174256.jpg

                                  This time I spent only 33g carbs.lol

                                  Winners Wear Winners

                                  BinoWorld UKB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • BinoWorld UKB Offline
                                    BinoWorld UK Bronze Member @zhang965
                                    last edited by

                                    @zhang965 I run my 5k in 40 minutes in zone 3 at about 143bpm and my fat burning is off the roof. The zone you are running is in eating in to your carbs rather then fat. From I can see your a serious runner so this is expected at rate you run.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • zhang965Z zhang965 referenced this topic on
                                    • First post
                                      Last post

                                    Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy