Why I've shelved my Peak for a 9

[freeheeler]

@surfboomerang
this might make the watch a bit un-rugged, don’t you think?
I would prefer to have the same sizes as S9B and maybe a tiny bit bigger screen…
I live in a place where I have to keep up with all the Rolex and other big chunky time pieces

[helgonet12]

@surfboomerang I agree about removing the bezel but I really like the size of the latest S9B. It would be awesome if the did the same on both watches or offered an S9P xl

[surfboomerang]

Ok, maybe a small bezel looks beter then no bezel at all
I’m sure Suunto will figure something out to surprise us.

[freeheeler]

@surfboomerang
THIS!!

[DMytro]

@surfboomerang I wonder if such a tiny bezel would influence the durability of the watch upon impact. But I really like the idea!

[surfboomerang]

@freeheeler Nah… THIS is what you really want

[freeheeler]

@surfboomerang said in Why I've shelved my Peak for a 9:

Nah… THIS is what you really want

you nailed it!!!

[___Alejandro___]

@surfboomerang I think I read somewhere that the bezel hides the GPS module, which sits underneath it in a ring-shape board… Or I could have imagined it!

[freeheeler]

@alejandro
that makes sense
and brings me back to an old topic that I do not find anymore… does anybody know where we can find teardown pictures of S9B?

[___Alejandro___]

@freeheeler I think it’s coming back to me… that’s how they were able to remove the GPS “bump” that’s on the strap of the A3P.

I believe (but please don’t quote me on it!) that’s why the A3P was perceived as more accurate – as long as the bump was facing up toward the sky. ;–)

[freeheeler]

@alejandro
It’s nice when you notice that you can be part of improvements.
I’ve criticized a couple of times the position of the baro holes and now S9P looks pretty nicely improved for this issue

[TonyG]

@egika said in Why I've shelved my Peak for a 9:

@foxster Thank you for sharing your insights.
For me other advantages of the Peak are:

• big improvement in the wrist HR measurement
• super quick charge

I would also add the

• adaptive light function, I think it works great
• clicky buttons

[MiniForklift]

I tried out the Polar Grit X Pro for a month before going back to my S9B, main thing was the screen size. The Grit X Pro is actually 4mm larger than the Peak but it still seemed quite small after using my S9B for nearly two years; like you I struggled to read the numbers whilst running and it ended up being the straw that broke the proverbial camels back

S9B Vs Polar Grit X Pro ❆ REVIEW

Now back with my trusty gold S9B, happy days

[suzzlo]

@surfboomerang

[freeheeler]

@suzzlo
me when Suunto releases S9P XL (or whatever they’ll call it…)

[suzzlo]

@freeheeler I’m waiting to have planned workout and structured workouts, then Spartan and Garmin 745 will go directly to the shelve and buy S9P or S9P XL or S5P Baro (let me dream)

BR

[sky-runner]

@foxster said in Why I've shelved my Peak for a 9:

Baro for me is not that important as the accuracy of the GPS altitude is fine for my trail running and hiking.

Accuracy of GPS is fine for the absolute altitude but not for calculating total ascent / descent. Non-baro Suunto watches have a rather large threshold so you’ll see total ascent / descent values noticeably smaller than actual.

[DMytro]

@sky-runner only if you hike small hills. If I go up a mountain with 600-1000 vertical meters, elevation is spot on with map/baro version. Elevation is only no good for hills.

[MiniForklift]

@dmytro Agree with this. Roling hills not so good but decent climbs are not far off. Feel like it’s got a bit better over the last update; I used to be way off compared to my training partner who uses a Garmin Enduro, now it’s pretty similar. Happy with this as my S9B always used to massively under report elevation gain

I do believe there’s a full fix coming in a future update

[DMytro]

@miniforklift I mean the non baro version, but alright