Software update 2.30.32

[jannis]

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos Right now it’s from the Telegram from the Playstore. I tried it with 2 Android phones and both doesn’t show the app icon, so I guess it must be the app. But like I said, paired with an iPhone I didn’t had any problems.

But Telegram was just an example. Don’t know if with other apps the app icons show up right.

Update: with the app from the telegram homepage the app icon works properly.

[UjcoCZ]

Interesting observation:

• the total activity time is for example 2:30h
• I do a new activity, time 1h
• on the miniwidget of the clock face it is still 2:30h
• button down, quick setting and back again, for a second the correct time appears on the miniwidget, i.e. 3:30h, then after a second it is still 2:30h
• change the dial, the correct time of 3:30h remains

[Santana Hakuba Kikstra]

@UjcoCZ said in Software update 2.30.32:

Interesting observation:

• the total activity time is for example 2:30h
• I do a new activity, time 1h
• on the miniwidget of the clock face it is still 2:30h
• button down, quick setting and back again, for a second the correct time appears on the miniwidget, i.e. 3:30h, then after a second it is still 2:30h
• change the dial, the correct time of 3:30h remains

Why is my 5km running estimate 3 minutes slower than my actual 5 km running recorders on the watch today while running?
Estimate 26.30, actual 23.30.

[Tieutieu]

@Santana-Hakuba-Kikstra
Because it’s “estimation” ! It’s based on your overall performances and exercices. It depends on whereas you use a HR belt or not, or OHR.
Estimation algorythm uses a combination of a lot of parameters (I guess VO2 estimation, age, weight, performances, pace…)
It also depends on how many runs you’ve done since you’ve owned your SR.
The performance you’ve done will certainly impact the estimation.
Also, one “extra performance” doesn’t mean one could do it everyday.
Would be interesting to have someday a section with “best performances on 10km/half/marathon…” that could be balanced with this estimation.

[Egika]

@Santana-Hakuba-Kikstra what is the VO2max reported by the watch?
And have you set age, weight, max HR etc. correctly?

[Olaf Gottschalk]

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos what did today’s new version 2.30.38 bring?
The Race showed it this morning but there is no info anywhere I searched…

[Mads Hintz-Madsen]

@Olaf-Gottschalk Changelog is in the Watches forum as the changelog is common for 9PP, Vertical and Race.

[Olaf Gottschalk]

@Mads-Hintz-Madsen thanks! Didn’t know I had to also look there!

[MiniForklift]

@Tieutieu Just looking at my estimates on the watch… they look pretty close to what I should be able to achieve on a good day. I’ve noticed they’ve definitely came more into line now that I have a good number of runs in the watch and these estimated times are fairly stable now

[seanvk]

Never mind… it’s been out a while.
Unable to delete this post.

My Race just got updated to 2.30.38? Any details yet?

[Tieutieu]

@seanvk discussed for days already

[Olaf Gottschalk]

@seanvk details on that update are on the general channel.

[Mauerwegler]

@Theo-Lakerveld said in Software update 2.30.32:

According to my opinion, the S9P is WAY MORE beautiful. I really like the S9P design. I also think the SSU that I used before the S9P was nicer. But that’s irrelevant and subjective.

I agree it is subjective, and I also agree with your „ranking“. The SSU, S9B Ti, S9P and S9PP had much cleaner looks than their successors SV and SR. I am probably very picky, I already did not like the bezel of the S9B non-Ti, so I don’t find it irrelevant . I know Suunto cannot please everyone but I’m surprised how the latest models look, and I hope there will be cleaner models again. It would be nice to have a chat with the Suunto Design department, just out of curiosity.