@Tomas5 said in Backup settings to account.: @wakarimasen with Ambit 2 there was way to program custom field using simple script language and lot of raw values available to use in calculations. I hope one day we will be able write own suunto plus apps and share them with comunity. Unfortunately, I was too late for the Movescount days. Shame. It sounds pretty cool.

@AYHAN-YILDIZ if your headset can accept a call, it should also be able to reject a call. At least all headsets I know can. Ignoring a call is always safer than rejecting while riding IMHO.

@magicedwin I’m in the same boat. I have a chest strap but many times I just want to broadcast for ease of use for short bike rides

@tuxbuster I voted as well.

I use this regularly and considering it is a 3rd party developer/app I am not sure how/when/if it would become a “Suunto” app/feature. Great solution to a missing function in the Suunto platform and kudos tot eh developer!

@Simon-Rasmussen I agree. That would make it much easier to categorize notifications at a glance. Right now, it feels a bit outdated.

@Manuel-Extreme That would be great. This is also a setting that I feel is missing from the watch. In everyday life, I don’t need any alert tones on the watch. During training, however, they are very helpful, as vibration alone is sometimes not enough to be felt during intense interval sessions.

I’m still in need of this one. Or the “remember the last 5-10 used timers” and present it as a list. Like the short list of the sports modes…

@muurain said in Ability to edit moves when we forget to stop it: I was just about to get a new Suunto watch and I’d also like to hear if there is any development on this. I get that some activity information may be difficult to calculate in the app. Even partial crop of an activity would be nice though, so the entire activity wont go to trash after one unfortunate drive home. Cropping on 3rd party services or apps sure is a workaround, but its really cumbersome and feels like a downgrade coming from Garmin & Strava. Suunto already does calculation of this values in watch (some of them maybe in app). So they have know-how, this is just matter of adjusting that algo and run it on cropped file. It depends on how they have it developed but still it should not be a rocket science.

@Manuel-Extreme The funny thing is that the majority of these metrics were easily accessible on previous watch generations, like the S9 and S9P. In the ‘Navigation options’ (accessible by pressing the lower button from the map), there is now only the text ‘NAVIGATION OPTIONS’ at the top. With those previous watches, info like the next waypoint name, ETE and ETA cycled there instead. I have tried to remind Suunto umpteen times, without luck…

@OutdoorMan I also find the existing limit of 3 data screens limiting, and there is absolutely no good reason why this limit exists. Keep in mind that older users with declining eyesight want fewer larger font fields per screen. I try to not exceed 4 fields per screen, and if I want to use a graph data field, that limits that screen to two fields. For example, on the main screen I have elapsed time, distance, HR, average pace. Then I always have a screen dedicated to vertical stats - current elevation, ascent, descent, vertical speed. That leaves me with only one data screen for everything else, and I have to think hard what I have there. Also, I like to have a screen focused on the current performance including pace, HR, cadence, etc. But then I also want fields like the battery level, sunset/sunrise time, etc. Also that leaves me no way to use any lap specific fields, which are sometimes useful when racing. I end up using some S+ apps as a workaround to have additional fields. But that is a rather poor workaround.

@Mff73 same here - had longer pauses up to 2 hours and no problems in just starting the activity again

@hschwaiger I wonder If the TSSp is not based on the normalized power (instead of the “standard” power), which means it’s already accounting for uphills in the TSS score (but not how technical the trail is of course)? At least I can see that my runs with ascent get more TSSp than flat runs with same distance and pace…

@Piiipmatz Tracks visible when zoomed out like it used to be would be a good start…

@chenmm Add me to the list of people who are frustrated with Suunto maps. To make it worse, when I bough Race S in October 2024 and later when I bough Race in March 2025, maps used to be more detailed. For example trails were visible on two additional zoom levels. But as Suunto was about to release Race 2 with much more powerful hardware, map rendering was changed in update 2.43.8 without any mention in the release notes and the level of details has became worse, especially for those of us who do activities on trails - hikers, trail runners, MTB riders, etc. See https://forum.suunto.com/topic/13311/map-rendering-and-trail-visibility-after-software-update-2.43.8-.12 Out of curiosity I compared map sizes before and after the change, but I couldn’t see much difference. This was based on some screenshots of the app map download screens in this forum from a year ago and comparing that to what we have now. Map sizes remained roughly the same. With regards to your comment about wasting the download size on 4 different map styles, I don’t think that is the case. It has been confirmed that Suunto maps are vector based, meaning that the same map data is fed into the rendering regardless of the map style, and different colors are applied at the last moment. Garmin map rendering works the same way. I would be surprised if it was any different. I don’t how what is the reason for the large map download sizes. They are very large indeed compared even to Garmin maps that are much more detailed. Perhaps the compression is not very good because of the small tile sizes. I can only guess. But on other hand, I guess higher compression ratio could lead to more CPU work during map use resulting in worse performance and higher battery use.