@Stefano-M64 By extension too, that would be insanely useful with the data already included in activity recordings (I know its there, I’ve read the JSONs by hand). Basically, just adding that to the graph area for each activity. That could also include GNSS accuracy, just saying—albeit off topic for this thread…

@dreamer_ This isn’t AI or a magic wand – it’s just so-called routing engine. A few examples are Brouter and GraphHopper. Google Maps, Komoot and Garmin have their own engines. I’m not sure what Suunto uses exactly – which is interesting, because the online and offline versions use different engines or just a different routing engine parameters. For example: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BRouter

This feature has finally been added with the latest app/device update (Race S in my case). You just need to download the offline map of your area in the iOS app, and then you can create or upload GPX files even without an internet connection and sync them to the watch. Thanks, Suunto !

@2b2bff Yeah, sorry, I wrote a really rubbish post!!! All you need to do is view the track; the rest is already there…

@sky-runner said in Climb Guidance improvement: @dreamer_ Suunto already has this feature if you add waypoints on the route. It works roughly the same - you can see one segment between two waypoints and track remaining amounts of climb and descent. What Suunto doesn’t do however is that it doesn’t show the waypoint name anywhere. I wish that was shown just like in the screenshot above. Also, Suunto has an ability to show the upcoming two or three segments between waypoints. Although this feature is broken at the end of the route unless that has been fixed in the last software update. I haven’t yet had a chance to test how the elevation profile with waypoints work with the last update, but what I have described has been available since last summer. Although I kind of like the visual rendering Amazfit.The graph seems to have a bit more resolution too. In the Suunto car the graph seems too compressed and low resolution vertically. Thank you so much for the very nice explanation @sky-runner

Implementation could be something simple like adding a toggle above, below, or between the charts. [image: 1775937647223-predicted2.jpg] [image: 1775937793728-predicted3.jpg]

@megakot this has also been my solution for the last couple of years, works well

@Fenr1r Thanks!

Same feature request here - few years later. I use the Race 2 watch to cover running sessions and climbing sessions, but even with a robust case and sapphire screen, it’s very hard not to knock or scratch it on the boulder/rock. The only solution to avoid wearing it too soon is to take it off for climbing sessions, so no tracking. It’ll be very nice to be able to reuse older training session as templates and be able, from the Suunto App, to replicate the session, only updating few parameters. Now I can mimic that by manually adding an activity, and specifying the duration, and guessing the energy impact in kcal. Would be very handy to record data a bit more efficiently by duplicating sessions. This, off course, only make sense if the previous sessions are similar enough.

And here’s my widgets for this morning; I’ve been awake a little less than an hour and enjoying coffee and waking up, then I’ll have my morning workout. [image: 1775310883490-dfaf8e4f-902a-4501-8bc7-d944d09aabb6-image.png] In this situation, both Resources and Recovery are similar, but I’d mark them both as slightly pessimistic to how I feel, which I’d say is closer to 85% than under 70%. I dual wear an Apple Watch and I have two apps that give me a ranking from Apple’s data. “The Outsiders” app has me more pessimistic at 51% readiness, which they write out as “recovery being fine, not flawless,” and Bevel, which oddly also gives me 51% recovery (these two apps are usually in the same area but rarely agree identically). What all these things are likely signaling on is my HR didn’t dip quite as much as normal. Suunto shows 51 (average 49) but it tends to read higher than Apple, where last night was low of 48, and my average is 44. This is almost certainly due to having a double IPA along dinner, as these days I have alcohol rarely and it tends to affect my overnight HR when I do. However, one drink typically doesn’t make me off my game the next day, so I’m not adjusting my plans too much for today’s workout.

@Never2late2LookAlive As I previously posted: Of course and it has been suggested numerous times, I’m sure. Stair climbing should be a separate sport profile in the watch because currently I have to use Aerobics profile to avoid getting nonsense distance and other indoor running metrics. Then sync it to the app and change the activity to Vertical running, so I can add actual elevation gain and number of steps. Probably same can be done using other profiles, but none of that is ideal. Stair climber profile should record/show number of steps, step cadence (should be easy even if the hand is resting on the handle as there is still plenty of subtle wrist movement for accelerometer to read), and elevation gain! (from steps where you can set custom step height under exercise options*, usually 20 cm). Setting the step length could be optional to calculate distance as well. *This would perhaps require creating an additional companion S+ app, where the step parameters would be set.

@Never2late2LookAlive said in Partner with Bevel Health for Whoop 5.0-like Health Data Analysis: @raven I think the idea is that Hevy syncs with Apple health which then syncs with bevel. This is how Hevy, HealthConnect, and Sonar Health work on android. Yes, I mentioned in an earlier comment (9 Feb 2026) that Bevel’s primary way of operation is getting data from Apple Health. I also mentioned there is no direct integration from Hevy to Bevel. The OP, Eurohiker, wants Suunto to connect directly with Bevel. My comment was Suunto should improve data written to Apple Health, which Bevel would then pick up. This would mirror how Hevy works. I’m not sure what you are clarifying?

@Sebastian-Wagner-0 Perhaps 30 meters would be sufficient. I agree that 100 meters is long on a steep terrain. To make it worse, 100 meters is likely the horizontal distance not the 3-D distance actually traveled. But regardless, this is more complex than it might seem.

Any ideas on how it might develop? [image: 1774881242345-1773152321940-suunto-run-lime-intervals.png]

@Squirrel Wow Thank you! it would be a big improvement!

@Egika didn’t even know there was a “Cycling - Commute” on the watch…