@Anthony-Guillemette additionally deletion from mobile…

As you can see it is being developed, but it is not usable yet. I guess it’ll be released this year.

I agree with the fact that steps are just a raw estimation of an activity while compared with all the other kind of metrics our watch can display. However, it sound strange that such “nearly-useless” metric is reported in the SA Daily Health section and can be also shown as a complication in the watchfaces, but cannot be added into a customized sport mode. @ScottBH7 as a workaround you can simply divide the total walk length for your average step length (about 0.7m), which however depends on your height, your speed, the way you walk … that’s why step count isn’t a good metric!

@Elipsus it is on of my main topics when filling in surveys. I am doing this from the day tags were introduced and keepdoing it. also I will be very happy once tags receive improvements

This would be nice. I was just trying to get an Apple Maps location to my Race 2 POIs and it shouldn’t have to be all about manual typing and figuring of coordinate systems. Garmin Explore can also just open any Apple maps location from share menu. It “just works”. It opens the same location in Garmin map and allows you to save a POI, create a route or start navigation easily. I think this kind of feature would be best if it actually supported any major map apps and links, like links to Apple and Google maps. This way you could use (or “share”) a location basically from any app or even a message or airdrop you received.

@Dima-Tsarikov Suunto had questionary published last month and the Strength Training was one of the items there. It’s already finished, but I also voted to have normal Weight Training mode: with exercises, weights and repeats. Suunto is barely usable in gym right now, so this is the aspect they need to fix to find the new audience. Based on survey - they probably have some plans, just a matter of priorities.

@martian It is work in progress https://forum.suunto.com/topic/15027/dark-mode

@Stefano-M64 By extension too, that would be insanely useful with the data already included in activity recordings (I know its there, I’ve read the JSONs by hand). Basically, just adding that to the graph area for each activity. That could also include GNSS accuracy, just saying—albeit off topic for this thread…

@dreamer_ This isn’t AI or a magic wand – it’s just so-called routing engine. A few examples are Brouter and GraphHopper. Google Maps, Komoot and Garmin have their own engines. I’m not sure what Suunto uses exactly – which is interesting, because the online and offline versions use different engines or just a different routing engine parameters. For example: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BRouter

This feature has finally been added with the latest app/device update (Race S in my case). You just need to download the offline map of your area in the iOS app, and then you can create or upload GPX files even without an internet connection and sync them to the watch. Thanks, Suunto !

@2b2bff Yeah, sorry, I wrote a really rubbish post!!! All you need to do is view the track; the rest is already there…

@sky-runner said in Climb Guidance improvement: @dreamer_ Suunto already has this feature if you add waypoints on the route. It works roughly the same - you can see one segment between two waypoints and track remaining amounts of climb and descent. What Suunto doesn’t do however is that it doesn’t show the waypoint name anywhere. I wish that was shown just like in the screenshot above. Also, Suunto has an ability to show the upcoming two or three segments between waypoints. Although this feature is broken at the end of the route unless that has been fixed in the last software update. I haven’t yet had a chance to test how the elevation profile with waypoints work with the last update, but what I have described has been available since last summer. Although I kind of like the visual rendering Amazfit.The graph seems to have a bit more resolution too. In the Suunto car the graph seems too compressed and low resolution vertically. Thank you so much for the very nice explanation @sky-runner

Implementation could be something simple like adding a toggle above, below, or between the charts. [image: 1775937647223-predicted2.jpg] [image: 1775937793728-predicted3.jpg]

@megakot this has also been my solution for the last couple of years, works well

@Fenr1r Thanks!