Is there still demand for a modern MIP endurance watch?
-
@safari said in Is there still demand for a modern MIP endurance watch?:
I was leaning towards MIP because of my approach to positioning the watch (otherwise I would have gone and bought an Apple watch
). I use it as an off-road computer. But MIP watches have different versions. The MIP screen technology in watches after the Fenix ââ6X has been significantly improved. On the other hand, I also had the chance to observe the Vertical 2. The screen clarity and map readability are better. My prejudice has been somewhat broken.The V1 has the best MIP screen made. When we were testing V2 we asked and were told MIP screen tech has not changed. So the only advances would be new HR and faster chip. I would argue the V1 is âmodernâ.
-
@Brad_Olwin Interesting. Coros improved their MIP screen between Apex 2 pro and Apex 4, one can clearly see it and at least for my eyes it looks better/brighter than Vertical 1 also. But not an expert, so might be just confirmation bias or smth.
Suunto Race 2 (Titanium Trail)
Suunto Vertical (Titanium Solar Forest) -
@aiv4r backlighting could be different but I doubt the screen tech is improved. We were also told MIP is more expensive now and very few suppliers.
-
@Brad_Olwin I heard that too at the time, a colleague have an Apex 4 and the MIP is really, really good, compared to my 9PP it really looks great, I unfortunatly donât have a Vertical to compare, but honestly i donât see why we would need better than that
-
I am MIP all the way, but, realistically, Iâm quite certain Suunto is done with them. Theyâve all but said so. I think itâs pure economics at this point.
@aiv4r How are you finding the Apex 4? Is it really more comfortable than the Vertical? You mentioned itâs less chunky, but does it wear better on the wrist? The dimensions are pretty similar.
And what about the Coros ecosystem? I had a Pace 2 years ago and just couldnât get over the immature visuals and UI/UX. Has it improved? Are there any actual good watch faces these days?
@brad_olwin I think you are correct that MIP tech hasnât necessarily improved since the SV1. I believe the difference more has to do with the distance from the screen to the glass. The solar panel on the SV1 recesses the screen a bit, decreasing clarity at off angles. The Apex 4 obviously doesnât have this.
-
@duffman19 It is quite nice and comfortable to wear, but I never got used to wearing Vertical 24/7, so for me it is way better, but that is very subjective. It also feels a bit like a toy watch, but also feels lighter for the same reason.
Design-wise it is a disaster still, graphics are bad and boring, watch faces are terrible, they have a lot of them, but I barely can find one I like.
The app itself has its own pros and cons, I like that âeffort paceâ for example feels a bit more integrated than NGP in Suunto (I can easily see Effort Pace graph throughout the run, while I cannot find a way to do that with NGP in Suunto app). -
@aiv4r NGP and AvgNGP can be added as a data field in custom sport modes. I use these, easy to see during the entire run.
-
@Brad_Olwin yes I am aware and I started to use it also, but I ment in the app after the run is uploaded.
Suunto Race 2 (Titanium Trail)
Suunto Vertical (Titanium Solar Forest) -
@aiv4r said in Is there still demand for a modern MIP endurance watch?:
@UjcoCZ said in Is there still demand for a modern MIP endurance watch?:
I like how Suunto handles the power-saving screenâit still shows the map, so I donât always have to wake the watch to full display.
Can I get more explanation on this? havenât seen
On the Garmin, if the display is in dim mode while navigating, I canât see anything and have to turn my wrist; on the Suunto, the basic map is still clearly visible in dim mode, so I donât always have to turn my wrist for a quick check of the route. On the Garmin, this is further complicated by a very poor light sensor. such magic before. AMOLED both.
-
@aiv4r said in Is there still demand for a modern MIP endurance watch?:
@Brad_Olwin yes I am aware and I started to use it also, but I ment in the app after the run is uploaded.
Agreed, for me I use S+ TrainingPeaks Run and you will have NGP in the app after the run, this will allow NGP to show in the lap table.
-
@Ecki-D. said in Is there still demand for a modern MIP endurance watch?:
Still, I think MIP continues to offer real advantages for an endurance-focused outdoor watch: battery life,
I read the other day, that the battery saving in daylight will be eaten by the need of a backlight in the darkâŚ
Race S
-
@2b2bff depending on how you use it. My backlight comes on only when I press a button on my Vertical 1. And that doesnât happen often.
-
@2b2bff I donât need a backlight in the dark with MIP Vertical 1, since Iâm wearing a headlamp while camping / racing whenever I look at my watch itâs lit up by the headlamp, further saving battery power on my watch.
-
@Ecki-D. I jumped from my loved 9PP to the Apex 4 last Chirstmas. For me, the Apex 4 ticks all the boxes: it basically embodies what a Vertical S should have been. Very happy with the change (bug free, perfect swimmingâŚ) , particularly now that the 9PP has been formally dropped from future updates.
-
@2b2bff I use a lot the SV1 in the dark, I do a lots of trail running in the dark and this not really true. I do not have backlight activated, as @brunoh and @litchimonster have said, its is not really necessary to always use the backlight, so, no extra battery consumption.
For me the ideal is the possibility of backlight only in activity with wrist movement for MIP screens, Right now, in the SV, if you activate raise to wake backlight it always works, in all situations, during the day and during activity (I know there is a light sensor but the watch lights up in situations it shouldnât, increasing the battery consumption a lot). In my experience, if you have raise to wake backlight only in activity, and you do a âspeedyâ activity, it is better because you see the watch faster and you do not need to point the headlamp to it.
As an example, at home we have 1 SV1 (no backlight only in activity), 1 S9P (no backlight only in activity) and 1 S5P (backlight only in activity), I use the SV1 and my older son used to use the S5P but now uses the S9B and his only complain with the switch was that there was not backlight with arm movement during activity and it was harder to read in dark/night activities. -
@fv4500 Sounds great! Maybe thatâs the way to go for me too. I use runalyze a lot and so there wonât be a lose in Training history while switching to coros. I really love Suunto on the other side and who knows, maybe there will be an alternative.
-
In my opinion, there is a place on the market, but only for a relatively small group of people, for an uncompromising outdoor watch, but this is definitely too narrow a group of potential customers for Suunto, or even any other manufacturer, to be particularly interested.
What I mean is MIP, five buttons, the ability to use it entirely without the touchscreen, and full offline functionality â both on the watch and in the app. And clean, intuitive, and responsive maps, compass, as well as the whole interface.
And additionally, a few tools that would be desirable in this type of watch: compass access while following a GPX route or using multiple navigation tools at the same time (currently only one tool can be used at a time); the ability to use routes saved in the Logbook without syncing with the phone; a more intuitive, native Live Track function; night mode (Red light), and increased distance tolerance from the planned route for the Off Route function.
But letâs be honest â the chances of a watch like this hitting the market are slim to none. People actually prefer smartwatches: âscoresâ instead of precise data for analysis, steps, floors, challenges, navigation like Google Maps, music, payments and other gadgets. Itâs a bit like most people who buy Arcâteryx or Patagonia jackets just to wear around the city. And you could say the same about a large group of Garmin users â this partly explains their position on the market.
-
@maszop It looks a lot like like a Garmin enduro 3 no ?
-
@Elipsus Too sluggish and too many âscoresâ and other smart-nonsense.
Maybe future Enduro 4?
-
I do think mips is superior for sportwatches.
My last watch with mips (forerunner 935) I only had to charge once every 2 weeks (until garmin introduced a bug when they added Galileo support. Since the I needed to charge every week regardless which setting I used)
My 2 last watches with amoled (forerunner 965and race s) both need to charge every 3 to 5 days (with the race s doing slightly better with more accurate gnns settings)
I find mips beter readable. I know the gadgetblogger dcrainmaker assures amoled is perfectly visible, but he makes a picture of the watch in direct sunlight and at home concludes to picture is very clear. But I wear sunglasses , have sweat in my eyes and sunscreen and running in and out shade/direct sunlight. No, it isnât very visible.
Thankfully the raise to wake works better on my suunto. There is a slight delay but the wake always comes. On the garmin more than half of the time the raise wasnât recognized. Never had this issue with watches with mip screens.
(Yes, I could turn on aod, but then I have to charge even more. And I donât want to charge often. Charging is bad for the battery. My forerunner 935 lasted almost 6 years, and I hope my race s can match that)But having said that⌠itâs the same as with smartphones. There are people complaining they rather have a thicker phone with a bigger battery than an ultra thin phone. But thin phones sell well. So either those people just fell for the better looks of a thin phone or it is just a very small, but loud group.
