System update – PXDZ.201119.005.A1

Aleksander H

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos said in System update – PXDZ.201119.005.A1:

@Aleksander-H FYI there are actually apps on the S7 that can also broadcast. So you could use the S7 to breadcast it’s OHR to another watch or platform for HR.

More over for others to know here, we as Suunto/Movesense have run the sensor (EGC) on S7 as a separate app

https://www.movesense.com/news/2020/06/connecting-movesense-to-suunto-7-smartwatch/

Read and enjoy

That’s incredibly cool (can’t believe I just said cool)! Thanks for the link! I used to do android dev work a couple of years ago, but haven’t touched it in a while. Might build a few terrible apps for Wear OS when I get the time.

fazel

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos crimany…so Suunto maintains/develops Movesense, Garmin purchases Firstbeat, yet Firstbeat choses Movesense to develop their sports monitoring platform. WUT?

Dimitrios Kanellopoulos

@fazel

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Also Garmin HRM’s use those pins to attach the module that is a Suunto patent.

Idk man. This whole thing is silly. hehe

fazel

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos this actually puts me at ease to some degree. The whole Garmin/Firstbeat partnership worries me with regard to some of the metrics used by Suunto watches. I was wondering if there was any way to partner with Whoop if Garmin played hardball, but this makes it seem like everyone’s happy to capitalize on each other’s expertise…

Dimitrios Kanellopoulos

@fazel I dont think you should worry. Garmin makes money from selling the FB features. Why stop it?

There is also polar…

fazel

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos I was more worried about increased prices for competitors like Suunto. But yeah…

Dimitrios Kanellopoulos

@fazel for now your watch will be ok. Lets see what happens with your next watch the s7 (?) and others…

brotzfrog10

@pavel-samokha I don’t believe what I said was as false. I never said updates wouldn’t happen or they the watch wasn’t burning developed. I said it seemed to me Suunto wasn’t sure what customer this watch was targeting, when if they had just included their full Suunto watch app they would of had the best smart watch/fitness watch combo on the market. They didn’t and they haven’t updated the sunnto training part of the watch since launch (just keep updating the maps portion) but the sunnto training app is no closer to what sunnto 5 or 7 offers them when the 7 first launched which is a shame. Had they just done that I think it would be the best smart watch on the market. It’s a huge missed opportunity and I think the price decrease on the 7 reflects the missed opportunity as you only lower it by $100 if sales are extremely soft.

Dimitrios Kanellopoulos

@brotzfrog10 having being a bit involved at the launch of the S7 it’s not that you are not right…

But the s7 was targeted to the SmartWatch market, the people that read Android Police for example and other XDA members. People who do not care so much lets say todo a set of intervals or record with a heart rate belt, because they will never buy one.

That is the launch of the product and not how / where it will evolve to.

At launch the team got the top 3 feature requests and issues and in those issues and requests there was nothing in regards to what you mention.

To be fair, wanting a product to become what one would like/love is different from what its made for.

But you are right on missing a market, as you described it, but is that market a big audience? Bigger than Android Wear enthousiasts and soccer moms? I dont think so.

pavel.samokha

@brotzfrog10 what I mean is that I believe what you said here

@brotzfrog10 said in System update – PXDZ.201119.005.A1:

It’s also been a year now so if something as simple as external sensor support was coming it would have been added already. Sportygo and even google fit for wear os already have sensor support so it’s not a limitation of the operating system. It’s simply a choice by sunnto which sadly makes no sense

is wrong.

brotzfrog10

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos Yes I think the market would want that simple option of connecting Bluetooth accessories. You cut off a rather launch group of fitness watch people because of not even having the option to connect BT accessories. Two biggest smart watch/fitness watch brands by sales are Apple and Garmin as I’m sure you know. All their devices (save for the lesser selling bands by garmin) have sensor connectivity. Suunto should be looking to compete with those brands as those are the watches people are buying. Wearos should just be a means to that end. The goal shouldn’t be to have a great selling wearos device as it’s such a small market share and not a major driver of smart watch sales. Android users aren’t rushing out to buy smart watches. The sales data is pretty clear on that. Regardless though even google fit which is built into all wear os devices has BT sensor connectivity. Plus attaching the Suunto name to a watch draws in a certain type of customer as well, one who is looking for an outdoor performance watch. Sunnto should be building on their brand name not undercutting what they are know for. It would be like Nike doing men’s suits, in that it wouldn’t make sense with what the brand is known for. Just like your point about soccer moms. How many soccer moms are looking for a Suunto watch or a smart watch at all let alone the size of the S7?

fazel

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos I briefly did some Google Scholar searching on HRV. The academic research is free to use. If I were Suunto, I’d be consuming and condensing the findings of this work in preparation for creating/testing my own algorithms. I’d take a similar approach with the Google OS. I wouldn’t want to be dependent on anyone. The 9’s UI is solid IMO. We can haggle over smaller points, but I think the platform is there to build on.

Dimitrios Kanellopoulos

@brotzfrog10

Just like your point about soccer moms. How many soccer moms are looking for a Suunto watch or a smart watch at all let alone the size of the S7?

Many. See reddit and other forums that the discussion is going on.

Launch trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BQ5nbmGtYA

Dimitrios Kanellopoulos

@fazel RD costs a lot but yes I do agree

isazi

@fazel lots of published research in sport physiology etc. is free, and this is the approach e.g. used by Runalyze (they even link to the research on which their computed metrics are based). Things are probably more complex in places like the US where those same ideas can be covered by patents.

brotzfrog10

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos I don’t know if that’s a great litmus test. If it’s about looking at forums just look at this forum to see how important sensor support is. Watch DC rainmaker and chase the summits reviews on the S7 and how frustrating not having sensor support is. These are two people who get thousands on eyeballs monthly on their content. They are huge drivers of smart watch products. Also think about it this way having sensor support in the app isn’t going to drive away any customer but not having it will. Has anyone on Reddit or another forum said I won’t buy that watch because it has Bluetooth sensor support? Well if that’s the case I hate to tell them that WearOs already has that feature through google fit so I guess they aren’t buying a wearos device anyway.

brotzfrog10

@pavel-samokha I’m fine being shown to be wrong and admitting it. But let’s play this through. Suunto known for sports performance and already having a well established training platforms is developing a new sunnto training app for a wear os device under their own brand. Yet they don’t port over all the features that already exist within their own sports watches. Isn’t it reasonable to discern that those features not ported over were don’t so for a specific reason? If not then why not just work to duplicate all the same features?

Dimitrios Kanellopoulos

@brotzfrog10 correct.

To be honest that was also one of the Suunto fears when launching this from a tester perpective. That people would demand more in terms of an expectation

pavel.samokha

@brotzfrog10 said in System update – PXDZ.201119.005.A1:

Isn’t it reasonable to discern that those features not ported over were don’t so for a specific reason? If not then why not just work to duplicate all the same features?

As simple as that, because S7 is completely different platform from S9/…
What may seem “just work to duplicate” from end-user perspective may be really complex goal to achieve from development perspective.

Fenr1r

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos said in System update – PXDZ.201119.005.A1:

To be honest that was also one of the Suunto fears when launching this from a tester perpective. That people would demand more in terms of an expectation

Sweaty flashbacks on those early Spartan months?