Suunto ZoneSense

The_77

maybe I’ve misunderstood what you wrote but it sounds to me like you are expecting ZS to align with the HR zones you set in your watch which are themselves based on generic ranges like 60% or 70% of HRR.

Yeah no not at all, I don’t expect any alignment, I was just showing something from my side. My zones are very different to you, our resting HR is similar, but I typically see green to yellow anywhere from 125 - 140, and I can count the number of times I’ve seen V02 max region pop up on one hand, I’ve never got an LT2 from ZS. Max HR is 182, I hit 180 maybe 1/2 times year, I just have an interesting heart

@Brad_Olwin said in Suunto ZoneSense:

For cycling possibly a bit different, I used to have my threshold for a 40 min TT. F

That is more or less what I’m used to from my experience as a cyclist first and runner second, the 95% of FTP for a 20 minute test stuff.

As I said mind, if I change it up to 168, it’ll flip the graph entirely, I’ll see what difference it makes in the next race.

/edit: I must have forgotten to change it last year tbf after the last time intervals.icu advised to do so

Extra edit: did the anaerobic S+ test this morning, wanted to throw up at the end, as is proper results vary from what you’d expect as you’d expect with intra-day HR variation, Runanalyze says HRV data is all good.

Stoke80

How much time do I need to be in a zone, that the respective threshold is shown afterwards in the app?

It seems 4 Minutes is not enough.

borgelkranz

@Stoke80 In my experience, there is no simple rule. Currently I mostly row on an erg or commute by bike. In rowing I had activities where 2 minutes were enough. But that was an sustained sub threshold effort followed by a ramp test. Never did an FTP Test on a bike. But I got an estimate when doing fun repeats across a bridge that crosses an express way. Those repeats were shorter than 2 minutes but in sum they resulted in feeling very tired. Both thresholds are different by approx. 20 beats when comparing cycling to rowing in my case. But quite stable within the same kind of sport. Did you try a ramp test or a longer sustained effort that pushed you to your limit already?

far-blue

@Stoke80 I’ve not analysed in detail but my gut feeling is ZS needs to ‘see’ a clear change in the RR data so blasting through into VO2max for a couple of minutes and hitting max hr would likely work but so would multiple ‘dips’ over into VO2Max and back into threshold. I mostly get LT2 (Zone 4 -> Zone 5) recommendations from ZS when I run threshold runs where my HR is dancing either side of LT2 (as I go up and down hills) and I sometimes get a recommendation when I over-cook the last step in a progression run. In the same way, I mostly get LT1 (zone2 -> zone3) recommendations when I do threshold intervals of a few mins with recovery of about 2 mins as my HR has time to drop back down to Zone 2 or Zone 1. Basically, the more your HR crosses the LT1 and LT2 thresholds within a workout (with enough time between that ZS can track it - so HIIT doesn’t work) the better it seems able to recommend zone settings.

fluca

@taziden or may be add the ability to choose permanently zone sense as intensity zones? alongside Pace and Power Zones?
If not yet proposed

far-blue

@fluca I don’t think that’s possible while ZS is still a SuuntoPlus app. But once the technology is stable, proven and not being developed as quickly I suspect it will be integrated directly into the watch firmware and then it would be a great option. While it’s still being developed quickly it’s much better to stick with it being an app because then the developers aren’t limited to the release cadence of the watch firmware

Maryn

@Brad_Olwin have you had a chance to check?

Brad_Olwin

@Maryn No answer yet

Luis Andés Olmedo

https://www.correrunamaraton.com/zonesense-suunto-test-prueba/

5 Months testing Zone Sense. He found inconsistencies in data and several other issues…

It’s in Spanish, but maybe you can translate the text to your native language using any online translator.

2b2bff

@Luis-Andés-Olmedo the interesting piece is that he connected two Suunto watches to the same Polar H10 and they gave different ZoneSense data what completely defers the point of using it…

Jan Suchánek

@Luis-Andés-Olmedo I think, we will see soon a DC Rainmaker version in English. I watched the video, it’s a huge disappointment. Useless random number generator at least for the tester. Very sad.

VoiGAS

@Jan-Suchánek Rays test was a long time ago - I would say it would have been published already if all the participants would have agreed to do so…

Edit: It was November 2024 https://bsky.app/profile/dcrainmaker.com/post/3lbaymc64fk25

Elmiuel

@VoiGAS You may be right. Eduardo (who runs a marathon) provides information in his analysis about a “recent” test, nothing about it having been performed in November. It’s perfectly clear that Ray is the third person to take the same test, and that’s why we can draw any conclusions.
A few days later, Eduardo released a video with “clarifications” about possible confusions in the previous video.
https://www.youtube.com/live/003mEjs_j9Y?si=X-sc-sqqAUCGjAC0
Waiting for possible reactions or Ray’s knowledge of his personal analysis… in short, as far as my use of ZS is concerned, it is a tool more focused on RESISTANCE, ULTRAS… and above all, very personal for controlling your RPE with your device…

Brad_Olwin

@2b2bff The belts will only send R-R data to one watch even if they connect to multiple watches. So how can one do the test? Have to wear two belts because no two tests can be identical.

Inge Nallsson

@Brad_Olwin I have not read the article, but the Polar H10 has two separate Bluetooth channels (only one enabled as default) plus the ANT+. It would be utterly strange if the R-R only went through one BT channel…

Elipsus

@Brad_Olwin ant + being a broadcast communication, any number of watch can “connect” to the strap at the same time, unless r-r data is just sent over bluetooth ? That would bé weird

2b2bff

@Brad_Olwin I have an HRM Dual that I use with the Race S (BT) and the Epix Pro (ANT+) same time. Both receive R-R data. In fact I tried Alpha-HRV data field on my Epix today to see if I can make any sense of it compared to ZoneSense…

My feeling is that the H10 will send R-R over both BT channels. Otherwise ZoneSense would refuse to work, wouldn’t it?

Brad_Olwin

@2b2bff My HRm_Pro his 3 channels but only sends RR on one. Maybe H-10 is different.

raven

@Brad_Olwin said in Suunto ZoneSense:

@2b2bff My HRm_Pro his 3 channels but only sends RR on one. Maybe H-10 is different.

Does the HRM_Pro differentiate the channels so one knows which has RR? For the Polar H10, connecting it to two devices there’s no difference in how the two channels appear that I can tell.

The Wahoo TRACKR has three bluetooth channels and claims to provide HRV with compatible apps. From my review of their tech specs, it does not say there’s a difference in those channels either.

https://www.wahoofitness.com/devices/heart-rate-monitors/trackr-heart-rate-buy

2b2bff

@Brad_Olwin as I said HRM Dual sends via BT and ANT+ same time…
I just read that on an article on alphaHRV that a Polar H10 or a Suunto Belt is preferred for good quality data…
https://aiendurance.com/blog/real-time-readiness-with-alphahrv-and-ai-endurance

That said, my alphaHRV values have been completely off. Judging from those values I ran around LT2 with about 150bpm. ZoneSense showed be short dips into yellow for that run, what is more likely, as my LT2 is usually above 170bpm.