Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Armband and ZoneSense

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Accessories and other products
    13 Posts 10 Posters 369 Views 10 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Manuel ExtremeM Offline
      Manuel Extreme
      last edited by Manuel Extreme

      I’ve read own Reddit that ZoneSense works with this optical heart rate monitor (Rhythm+2.0).
      A comparison of the data between a chest strap and this optical sensor would be necessary.

      https://www.scosche.com/scosche-rhythm-plus-2-0-heart-rate-monitor-armband

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F Offline
        Freezer Bronze Member @Gunnar
        last edited by Freezer

        @Gunnar, according to to Texas Instruments Technical Article from May 2018 OHRs can and do measure R-R intervals. They state:

        “Here’s further detail on some of the measurements possible with optical heart rate sensors:
        …
        R-R interval (heart-rate variability) – The R-R interval is the time between blood pulses; generally, the more varied the time between beats, the better. R-R interval analysis can be used as an indicator of stress levels and various cardiac issues.”
        (page 2)

        Source: https://www.ti.com/lit/ta/sszt726/sszt726.pdf?ts=1771583450198&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%252F

        I would presume that also Suunto’s OHR measure R-R intervals as they calculate night time HRV.

        That being said AFAIK the R-R measurements from OHR are not good (precise) enough for ZoneSense calculations which are thus limited to ECG (chest) straps. So even if Coospo OHR, or another OHR, does broadcast R-R interval data it would probably result in wrong/not accurate ZoneSense data.

        https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8927864/

        Note that the HRV marketing of the Coospo might refer only to night time HRV calcualtion (as is the case with Polar Verity Sense).

        G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • The Lost AlienT Offline
          The Lost Alien @ADidier
          last edited by

          @ADidier I had the same sensor and tried it with ZoneSense, but it didn’t work.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • F Offline
            far-blue
            last edited by

            I have the Rhythm +2 band and recently updated its firmware to the new version that supports HRV. I’ve not tested but I don’t think it’s possible to do HRV alongside HR in a workout because you have to switch to HRV mode by triple-pressing the button. The docs indicate HRV mode is for apps such as HRV4Fitness rather than during workouts.

            But I’ll try and see 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • G Offline
              Gunnar Bronze Member @Freezer
              last edited by

              @Freezer Thank you for the detailed explanatiion. Lothar Matthäus would say “Again what learned” 😁

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • cosme.costaC Offline
                cosme.costa
                last edited by

                The thing is that the OHR sensors (watch and armbands) can measure R-R doing estimations as they can measure the HR. They do not measure directly the electric pulses as the chest straps. Is for that that that they do not work with Zonesense.

                2 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • 2 Offline
                  2b2bff Silver Members @cosme.costa
                  last edited by

                  @cosme.costa I think ZoneSense needs r-r data. I don’t know whether the watch can differ between ECG or OHR generated one. The HRM just has to deliver the r-r data to the watch to make it work.

                  Suunto Race S
                  Garmin Epix Pro

                  H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • H Offline
                    halajos Bronze Member @2b2bff
                    last edited by

                    @2b2bff optical HR sensors can never be as accurate as measuring the electrical signal with a chest strap. The higher the heart rate, the shorter the R-R intervals, so the measurement error of optical signal detection are a higher percentage of the R-R interval as the HR increases. This throws the math of ZS way off.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • F Offline
                      far-blue
                      last edited by

                      the raw signal picked up by chest straps is incredibly noisy. The HR monitors need to perform some serious heavy lifting to clean up the signal and track the heart. In many ways, the optical devices actually have an easier time of it. However, optical devices consume a lot of power and one way to improve power use is to drop the sample rate. When the sample rate is too low the r-r data is obviously going to be distorted. But I wouldn’t say optical HR monitors will never be accurate enough - it should be possible if there’s enough demand for manufacturers to develop high-sample-rate devices with enough accuracy.

                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M Offline
                        maszop Bronze Member @far-blue
                        last edited by

                        @far-blue They can be noisy (who cares) if they are the most accurate and the only reliable.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy