Suunto 9 Peak (review and specs)

[surfboomerang]

@andré-faria Same goes for The Netherlands

[A Former User]

@andrejsg If you are asking about US and Canada, my guess is after the Memorial Day weekend. On one hand, there’s a big sale going on on existing models. On the other, Suunto probably wants to give the rest of the world an opportunity to pre-order theirs before people like myself lay claim to the entirety of the first few production batches…

[andrejsg]

@nickk Yeah I guess it makes sense for it to go live after memorial day. Here’s what I’m seeing:

[A Former User]

@andrejsg We are seeing exact same thing So, the reality is… real. Hopefully, that nice pre-order button is finally shown in coming days.

Also, I remember Suunto 7 could also be pre-ordered on Amazon, if it helps.

[wotus]

@dimitrios-kanellopoulos What are the correct Measurements? The description says 43 x 43 x 10.6 mm but from the picture the thickness should be 13 mm link text.

[andrejsg]

@nickk just pre-ordered mine yesterday

[Dimitrios Kanellopoulos]

@wotus I am not sure

[Soojong Moon]

@wotus According to The5kRunner review, it seems to depend on whether the OHR sensor is included or not.
https://cdn.the5krunner.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Capture-19.png

[Rob33]

@soojong-moon Weird the thickness of the suunto 9 baro

[Mff73]

@rob33

@soojong-moon said in Suunto 9 Peak (review and specs):

it seems to depend on whether the OHR sensor is included or not.

[suzzlo]

Another question. Did anyone know if S9P has an updated CPU compared to S9b?

I assume a new processor has been added (less power consume and higher capacity) but I could be wrong

BR

[Rob33]

@mff73 OK.
It seems very strange to me to measure an element without taking part of this element into account !

[Mff73]

@rob33 said in Suunto 9 Peak (review and specs):

@mff73 OK.
It seems very strange to me to measure an element without taking part of this element into account !

It is a point of view, effectively.
Personnaly (and I never had a watch with OHR… yet), but I feel like the sensor is expected to “press into the skin” (sorry for this expression ), and the real thickness of the watch (seen when worn) is more like measuring without this sensor.
So, marketing new measures, or new reference, result is to compare apples to apples.

[A Former User]

@mff73 I agree. You can’t really add sensor protrusion to the overall thickness, because it really isn’t a part of the watch profile on your wrist. I know it’s splitting hairs (and tattoos), but as with moles, it’s what’s above your skin that matters

[Mff73]

@nickk
In a better English… Yes

[Rob33]

@mff73 Yes it can be heard. In fact it is the data available on the SUUNTO site that is confusing …

[Bulkan]

Watching the review of Joaquin this view seems to me a bit “flatter” in the peak compare to the baro, isn’t it? The screenshot I took is not the best so I put a blue line. Minute 9:27 in this video

[surfboomerang]

@bulkan Maybe the scale is somewhat different, but I do see a similar pattern in both tops. I don’t think the data is diffent.

Watching a little bit further at 9:35, I noticed the bug I reported here is solved in the S9 peak! The sun icon is now visible against a white background. Hope it comes to the S9B too.

[surfboomerang]

Can someone tell me what the green horizontal bar between the datafields is you see in the video? I have never seen it.

Edit: Nevermind… I just found out about the “Target” setting. I never used it

[jthomi]

Since there seems to be a bit confusion about the thickness, at least for me, can someone post a pic of a Suunto Spartan Sport without OHR in comparison to the new Suunto 9 Peak? That would be awesome…