Suunto 9 Peak Pro?
-
@mountainChris
the slate is my favorite, too. it’s a great design.
I also like the ocean a lot, especially the strap design. -
@kielegat no, it seems that there are hardware constraints
-
@krakra it looks brushed somehow. I like it
-
I recorded this little video to show how the menu responsiveness looks
-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos
thank you for sharing!
…the “I want it” feeling is growing
-
I have a couple of questions for the testers.
- Did they add a sport mode “duathlon”?
- Is it possible to edit the sport mode “triathlon”?
- Is it possible to create your own sport mode with one-touch switching? (Example: ski race - transit - bike - transit - run).
- Has the body resource bug where resources drop to 0 after stretching been fixed?
- Are there any changes to the “swimming in the pool” sport mode? (rest timer, adding distance for leg exercises).
Thanks!
-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos much more responsive, but still a little bit laggy. Will suunto work on improving this or is the performance limited due to hardware limitations?
-
@Stas-Varazhbit said in Suunto 9 Peak Pro?:
I have a couple of questions for the testers.
No idea why someone downvoted you, must have been a mistake
- Did they add a sport mode “duathlon”?
Not that I know, but there is an experimental swimrun S+ app to test things like automatic transition. From rumors I heard, if everything goes well these may transition from S+ to the firmware.
- Is it possible to edit the sport mode “triathlon”?
No.
- Is it possible to create your own sport mode with one-touch switching? (Example: ski race - transit - bike - transit - run).
I don’t know, probably not.
- Has the body resource bug where resources drop to 0 after stretching been fixed?
Dimitrios said yes the other day.
- Are there any changes to the “swimming in the pool” sport mode? (rest timer, adding distance for leg exercises).
No, also for that it may come to S+ first and firmware later.
-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos Is this with the final firmware or still beta?
-
@surfboomerang beta
-
@Stas-Varazhbit the reosuces should be fixed and coming up I think for all devices.
-
@isazi said in Suunto 9 Peak Pro?:
Has the body resource bug where resources drop to 0 after stretching been fixed?
Also with the update for the S9P? -
The ability to change the order of the screens is great and long requested. Isn’t this also planned for older watches? I don’t think this is limited by hardware. Or am I wrong?
-
It would be nice with the S9P update to at least have the new activity selection or something equivalent. I think this should not be too complicated and does not require the new hardware. .
-
@Frederick-Rochette that’s what Dimi said.
-
@Pavlas I doubt it will come. I do not think it is a hardware issue, but may require rewriting part of the old interface if that one wasn’t built to be configurable like the new one, and that is a cost.
-
@isazi said in Suunto 9 Peak Pro?:
@Pavlas I doubt it will come. I do not think it is a hardware issue, but may require rewriting part of the old interface if that one wasn’t built to be configurable like the new one, and that is a cost.
a cost that would significantly benefit the user base… so maybe a profitable decision, long term.
-
We already had the same discussion at the Spartan / S9 transition and unfortunately the story was not in the direction of the owners of spartan … it seems to be repeated S9 § / S9PP. These are business model choices, Suunto does not have the customer base of a Garmin
-
@thanasis from customer point of view for me this brings no real benefits. S9 and peak got so many features and accuracy updates over the years which are really useful. F6 did not get so much love in details as S9 imo. But efforts for only new graphics I would say not so necessary. But of course should a new watch with new processor get new UI with graphics… that’s whats happening.
-
@mountainChris said in Suunto 9 Peak Pro?:
@thanasis from customer point of view for me this brings no real benefits. S9 and peak got so many features and accuracy updates over the years which are really useful. F6 did not get so much love in details as S9 imo. But efforts for only new graphics I would say not so necessary. But of course should a new watch with new processor get new UI with graphics… that’s whats happening.
I think It is a trivial feature in terms of implementation with significant benefits (the enablement/disablement of screens) and something that was there from ambit times as well. I don’t think it so big but the mentality of “we don’t invest in that because it involves costs etc” even though it is something that should (or was expected) to have been there in the first place . anyway, they can do anything they want … I am just sharing my view