Is the Vertical as sub-standard as it seems?
-
@Andrewx01 somehow I have the exact feeling as you, in terms of GPS accuracy and the sleep tracking part which Garmin seems to be more accurate. I am using my 965 as my main watch now and thinking of letting my Vertical go.
-
@BrunoH well said. I use both Garmins and Suuntos, but my Baro is my favourite by far. No, it’s not perfect, it’s outdated now, and isn’t loaded with features. But it’s rock solid in so many areas and the quality build is just nuts compared to my Garmins. To me my Baro will be with me for a long time to come. I feel an attachment to it. The Garmins are great but they’re just means to an end. There’s a difference.
-
@Andrewx01 I was and continue to be (and hopefully remain) ‘All In’ Suunto boy. And the Vertical was and is a damn great looking device. However, I have been plagued with crashes mid activity with the old device and out of the activity with the new that I have now placed in my drawer turned off. Its a pitty really, I am hardly waiting to test it with the new FW but if I get another crash I guess its a sad goodbye by me. I mean all have errors and gimmics especially if you offer so many metrics (Garmin). But none of the other watches I had or tested have crashed mid activity or crashed at all. (The F6x once got stuck with some weird screen shadows and was repalced in less than a week). I think that the App / Backend dev teams are doing one hell of a job and the Suunto ecosystem is the best looking and modern out there but the embedded SW is not being shown the same love. I do know embedded is much more tricky than the others but still Suunto sells watches not services.
-
@Hristijan-Petreski A causa dei miei frequenti arresti anomali durante l’attività sportiva ho deciso di spedirlo in assistenza, Dopo 10 giorni l’assistenza mi risponde che l’orologio dopo vari test è perfettamente funzionante…L’unica speranza è che esca presto un nuovo aggiornamento firmware… E’ davvero frustante ciò, anche perchè ho abbandonato il mio affidabilissimo S9 B per il meraviglioso SV.
-
@Andrew_ Lol here’s another post that refers to features that Garmin has to offer as “gimmicks.” Without saying whether or not if I agree, it’s just funny because 6 months to a year from now Suunto will find a way to incorporate those same “gimmicks” into their devices. However they’ll no longer be gimmicks…they’ll suddenly be the best thing ever.
-
@TyreseJ4 said in Is the Vertical as sub-standard as it seems?:
@Andrew_ Lol here’s another post that refers to features that Garmin has to offer as “gimmicks.” Without saying whether or not if I agree, it’s just funny because 6 months to a year from now Suunto will find a way to incorporate those same “gimmicks” into their devices. However they’ll no longer be gimmicks…they’ll suddenly be the best thing ever.
No,
all garmin features are gimmicks, because the G from garmin meaning gimmicks,
Suunto has no G.
-
@TyreseJ4 that is because the way Garmin does it, is they generate some data, but the algorithm behind it is cumbersome and thus those things are gimmicks.
When Suunto does it, they do it right and scientifically backed. They then make it useful. HRV has been discussed - you will see other useful features soon
t6, S6, Elementum Terra, Ambit 3 Sapphire, Spartan Ultra Copper, Traverse Alpha, S7 Graphite LE, S9B Ambassador, S9P Granite Blue Titanium, S9PP Titanium Sand, Vertical All Black, Race Titanium Charcoal, Race S All Black, Race S Titanium Canary
-
A gimmick isn’t necessarily a bad thing, it’s all about perception.
If you find a featured useful, good on you, that doesn’t mean it’s good for everyone. Garmin attempts to deliver a plethora of features, some that are truly meaningless, others that are incredibly beneficial. I agree, there are many features I do wish Suunto had that Garmin has that I would still consider a gimmick lol.
Body battery, to me, is useless. Just like resources, to me, is useless. Listen to your body.
I previously believed that HRV / Stress were hit or miss, but I swear by the fact that a Garmin can detect when you’re getting sick before you can.
So, while I’m sure some write off Garmin, while using the term gimmick as a demeaning term, my point was that I don’t need 90% of what they offer. Why? Because those features are gimmicks that don’t help with my training.
-
@Egika and steps, spo2, resources, sleep? I know there is update coming, but those are gimmicks for couple of years already. Also music, let’s se if new Suunto watch will have music. As far as I remember this is not the feature for target audience… I’m big Suunto fan, but you have to be realistic and not a fanboy, sorry.
-
Egika said in Is the Vertical as sub-standard as it seems?:
@TyreseJ4 that is because the way Garmin does it, is they generate some data, but the algorithm behind it is cumbersome and thus those things are gimmicks.
When Suunto does it, they do it right and scientifically backed. They then make it useful. HRV has been discussed - you will see other useful features soon
Winners Wear Winners
-
G from garmin is gimmicks
S from Suunto is scientific -
@zhang965 it is so scientific that it can’t record the swim laps correctly…
-
and does not detect the type of swim
will see next update -
In meantime, Suunto’s trained computer scientist is working on improvement gps tracker for running on 16mins/km
Winners Wear Winners
-
@Egika right so basically you are implying that the rest of the market has it all wrong and should take Suunto’s lead. Quite a heavy dose of implicit bias right there! So to be scientific, Suunto is happy to generate €35+ million in loss in 2022.
-
@altcmd said in Is the Vertical as sub-standard as it seems?:
Egika right so basically you are implying that the rest of the market has it all wrong and should take Suunto’s lead. Quite a heavy dose of implicit bias right there! So to be scientific, Suunto is happy to generate €35+ million in loss in 2022.
Wow that’s a lot of added value.
-
@zhang965 ouch!
-
@Egika
and that is why Suunto leverage the same underlying algorithms as they want gimmicks too…
Guess you have never read the white papers hence comment that they have no underlying scientific basis. Sure I am sure some haven’t but the vast majority do when you go through the whitepaper.
Guess you haven’t seen the +500 scientific studies that they are currently taking part in.
And what was a really interesting when reading the article was about how scientific the brands are getting - I remember the article discussing how Garmin, Whoop and Oura - funny I don’t remember anything about Suunto…and how heavily underlined their metrics are in science and how much research they are doing to underline the metrics and to help other sections withing the medical health and fitness professions.
Sure some things are gimmicks - take SPO2 - massive gimmick. You can even take ECG and consider that a massive gimmick on smartwatches as 1 lead vs 12 leads so cannot pick up host of conditions - yet despite that sometimes those gimmicks are useful to some people.
And sure a feature like climbpro sounds like an absolute gimmick - until you use it and find out just how useful it can be. -
@altcmd said in Is the Vertical as sub-standard as it seems?:
@zhang965 ouch!
ouch! finally we found a true suunto target audience!
-
Who would have ever thought that a clickbait title like this would have ended up in such an abundance of great content.
Watch: Suunto Vertical Ti
Blog: isazi's home
