Suunto 9 Peak Pro?

[zhang965]

@Łukasz-Szmigiel said in Suunto 9 Peak Pro?:

It took me some time getting used to larger fonts and less whitespace, but I currently use 7 fields for running and it works well. I don’t need as much data, but having 4 fields makes the font too large for my taste, and I simply have both the avg and current pace or cadence left / right, so it’s not an issue

May I know your pace for running? 5min/km?
And average hr if you don’t mind, it’s about 150?

[Łukasz Szmigiel]

@zhang965 said in Suunto 9 Peak Pro?:

5min/km?

I wish

Example:

10.02 km
6:28
140 avg

10.03 km
6:54 (a few stops during with acceleration to ~3:00 at the end)
139 avg

10.74 km
6:22
142 avg

[zhang965]

@Łukasz-Szmigiel said in Suunto 9 Peak Pro?:

@zhang965 said in Suunto 9 Peak Pro?:

5min/km?

I wish

Example:

10.02 km
6:28
140 avg

10.03 km
6:54 (a few stops during with acceleration to ~3:00 at the end)
139 avg

10.74 km
6:22
142 avg

Actually it’s my observation, s9pp works great with some kind of pace and HR, so far all persons that had uncertain values are running with 160+hr .
And the rise to wake as well, it works great when we are slower.

[Łukasz Szmigiel]

@zhang965 interesting. Shouldn’t it interfere with cadence too? I.e. be prone to bad readings with higher cadence?

[zhang965]

@Łukasz-Szmigiel said in Suunto 9 Peak Pro?:

@zhang965 interesting. Shouldn’t it interfere with cadence too? I.e. be prone to bad readings with higher cadence?

Maybe, who knows,

I argued a lot before with that dumb guy on this forum about the rise to wake feature, because I cannot trigger it correctly during my runs and he claims it works for him perfectly.

And one day, he post a run and I saw his pace…then I do understand.

If you run with a lower speed, it will work better, but if you run faster than 4:00mins/km it will be a problem, for example when you run with 4:00/km, it means 4m/s , rise the arm, wait the screen wakes up will take 1,5s (or more) reading values takes 1,5s, it means you are not looking forward about 10 meters. It’s kind of dangerous.

It’s also my concerns on Suunto products, it seems target to the LSD runners, if you are high HR player, you are out,

[jw cou]

@zhang965 for OHR, maybe it’s more speed (and/or cadence) than HR. I run frequently at 160bpm+ but am way slower than you (around 5:00/km) and OHR works well for me. I also have a very low cadence (approx. 150).

You’re too damn fast

[zhang965]

@jw-cou said in Suunto 9 Peak Pro?:

@zhang965 maybe it’s more speed (and/or cadence) than HR, I run frequently at 160bpm+ but am way slower than you (around 5:00/km) and OHR works well for me. I also have a very low cadence (approx. 150).

You’re too damn fast

I don’t know, I only use belt sensor…the belt never cheats on me…

I run faster than you because I run less longer than you

[freeheeler]

@zhang965
edit: red is HR chest strap, rest OHR

[dulko79]

@zhang965 slow down man

[zhang965]

@dulko79

It’s what I did this morning, I’d say the gps is impressive, I still hope s9pp would have came with dual band.

,

[dulko79]

@zhang965 You must have had beans for breakfast you are a rocket. What would be different if your watch had dual band?

[zhang965]

@dulko79 I don’t know, maybe the gps is better during cloudy days?

[dulko79]

@zhang965 did you experience bad GPS reception on S9PP with cloudy weather?

[Łukasz Szmigiel]

@zhang965 do you know your max hr, considering that you can easily run 10k with 177?

[zhang965]

@Łukasz-Szmigiel

yes I do, I did a lab test to know all.

[dmn23]

@freeheeler I wish my S9PP OHR sensor worked as well as yours

[Łukasz Szmigiel]

@zhang965 pretty amazing! I’m dead nearly instantly after I reach 170+.

[zhang965]

@Łukasz-Szmigiel said in Suunto 9 Peak Pro?:

@zhang965 pretty amazing! I’m dead nearly instantly after I reach 170+.

It’s not amazing, it’s just youth, I normally do my 10k at 180 average. I also did at 191 on average…

[freeheeler]

@zhang965

[Martin Vrska]

Greetings to all Suunto 9 Peak Pro owners!
First of all, I would like to say that I am very satisfied with the watch - route recording, battery life, etc… But one thing bothers me a little: the step counting, which is very sensitive, so much so that you just raise your hand while sitting and the steps jump, or at least a step. Can this sensitivity be adjusted somewhere? Do you have a similar experience? Couldn’t another update fix this? Thanks for your opinions.