Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Pros/Cons of Suunto 9 BARO * ONLY * be fair and polite!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto 9
    330 Posts 46 Posters 34.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • zhang965Z Offline
      zhang965
      last edited by

      I do understand your con point, if you speak French, you will also understand your con’s meaning

      Btw
      The algorithms for Ohr and chest are different,

      Chest belt can calculate the hr based on actual RR interval

      But ohr has to get an average from a period it’s why we say ohr needs wear it for some minutes before beginning sport

      Winners Wear Winners

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        johann.fuehrer Bronze Member @johann.fuehrer
        last edited by

        @johann-fuehrer said in Pros/Cons of Suunto 9 BARO * ONLY * be fair and polite!:

        @zhang965 said in Pros/Cons of Suunto 9 BARO * ONLY * be fair and polite!:

        bob ross said There are no mistakes, just happy LITTLE accidents.

        🙂 nice that am not the only one who watched him 🙂

        @zhang965

        You have been right: "“We don’t make mistakes – we just have happy accidents.”

        Mixed up quotes of B.R.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • zhang965Z Offline
          zhang965
          last edited by

          When I begin using S9, my PB of 10k has changed a lot , 45m (a3p and ssu ) to 38m (s9)
          You know I’m the guy only run once 10k a week at Sunday morning .

          I thought it because I 'm running quicker, but it actually s9’s gps running quicker than me…

          Winners Wear Winners

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • zhang965Z Offline
            zhang965
            last edited by

            I had some really really bad time with s9, but now it doesn’t matter anymore:
            s9 is still being developed, s9 is still young, suunto has still time to finish it, new firmware is on the way, unless ssu, three years later of his release, one year in outlet, it still looks like an unfinished watch

            Winners Wear Winners

            freeheelerF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • freeheelerF Offline
              freeheeler @zhang965
              last edited by

              @zhang965
              I’m still not convinced if it’s a good or bad plan to throw a product on the market in test stage and use customers over 3 years time to improve it…
              or do it like others: secretly test and improve until perfection and then surprise and overwhelm the customers with a big bang

              living sideways

              J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J Offline
                johann.fuehrer Bronze Member @freeheeler
                last edited by johann.fuehrer

                @TELE-HO said in Pros/Cons of Suunto 9 BARO * ONLY * be fair and polite!:

                @zhang965
                I’m still not convinced if it’s a good or bad plan to throw a product on the market in test stage and use customers over 3 years time to improve it…

                Microsoft was doing well with that approach, like IBM, Apple, Google (Android), … and the difference to Suunto is: their (Suunto’s) software usually do NOT crash! But customer feedback is somewhere different than what you cannot get in an “sterile” test environment. The “wild” is always different. And the the test base of Microsoft and Suunto might be slightly different in size…

                That’s the reason, garmin drops out each beta in the wild, and let customers to the hard work (“but we’ve told you: it BETA!!, sorry for your data…”)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Saketo NemoS Offline
                  Saketo Nemo Moderator @johann.fuehrer
                  last edited by

                  @johann-fuehrer

                  up to 7 fields per screen, and it’s really handy when you don’t want to play too much with buttons, like when u r riding. possibility to activate energy saving profiles or change the GPS accuracy (or turn it off) during the activity. set repeated directly from the clock. set autolap from the start screen (if I am not mistaken, on ambit, it had to be entered first).
                  And…i’ll think this night, time to sleep 🤭

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • Brad_OlwinB Offline
                    Brad_Olwin Moderator
                    last edited by

                    I agree with the oHR feature, it is a problem. Perhaps the watch weight is an issue. I can wear mine where I do not want to partway up my arm and get good oHR. You missed some pro FusedTrack and absolutely amazing battery life, something my Ambits did not have.

                    Vector/T6c/Ambit 3 Peak/S5 Copper/S3/S7 Ti/S9 baro Ti/S9P Ti/S9PP Ti/Vertical Ti/Race Ti/RaceS/Ocean/Wing

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • ? Offline
                      A Former User
                      last edited by A Former User

                      pros:

                      • Look
                      • Comfort
                      • Battery life in sport mode with GPS
                      • Vibration
                      • Breadcrumbs
                      • Ability to zoom in navigation mode, but that is somewhat crippled by having to unlock

                      Mixed pros/cons:

                      • Display - higher resolution but worse contrast / visibility
                      • Measures longer, closer to true distance on trails while GPS is less accurate. The reason that happens is because there is some wobbling side to side which kind of compensates cutting through the turns and switchbacks so the distance ends up being slightly truer compared to A3.
                      • Automatic FusedAlti - cool idea in general but it often leads to less accurate elevation gain.
                      • Direction arrows on navigation route - useful but not always working correctly.

                      Everything else - either features I don’t care about or cons.

                      In particular, two strong cons compared to A3P are:

                      • Lack of dedicated Light and View buttons
                      • Can’t see upcoming waypoint details on demand like in A3 (in A3 that is done by pressing View button in navigation screen)
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • ? Offline
                        A Former User
                        last edited by

                        Here is my point of view and I try to keep a comparison with the Fenix 6x Pro out of this:

                        Pro:

                        • Great user interface
                        • easy usability
                        • no overload of options/functions
                        • very good GPS tracks on the mountains in my area (Southern Germany)
                        • native support for running power

                        Cons:

                        • lack of watchface configuration for intervals (e.g. 3 metrics: timer or distance, power, heartrate)
                        • missing additional data from external sensors in the FIT file
                        • vibration alarm too less intensity (I sometimes do not recognize it while sleeping)
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • zhang965Z Offline
                          zhang965
                          last edited by

                          The step counter is too sucking to be a con ?

                          Winners Wear Winners

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A Offline
                            azeanic
                            last edited by azeanic

                            I ran a 109k race recently and there was a Suunto 9 (me), a Coros Vertix and a Fenix 5 (two other runners) My observations were.

                            • Suunto 9, the distance was off by quite a bit. I had to probably minus 6-8k off the current distance on the watch to match the course. Saving grace was the navigation and course profile. The estimated time arrival was quite useful as well.
                            • Fenix 5, had the most accurate distance among the three.
                            • Coros Vertix, had the best battery life among us 3 at the 60km mark. I had to disable OHR and charge a bit half-way through the race and finished with about 18% after 29.5 hours. Whilst I vaguely remember the Coros has more than enough battery to get to the finish line without a recharge.
                            freeheelerF sartoricS zhang965Z ? 4 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • freeheelerF Offline
                              freeheeler @azeanic
                              last edited by

                              @azeanic
                              never run out of battery says suunto…?!

                              living sideways

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • sartoricS Offline
                                sartoric Moderator @azeanic
                                last edited by

                                @azeanic said in Pros/Cons of Suunto 9 BARO * ONLY * be fair and polite!:

                                Coros Vertix, had the best battery life among us 3 at the 60km mark. I had to disable OHR and charge a bit half-way through the race and finished with about 18% after 29.5 hours. Whilst I vaguely remember the Coros has more than enough battery to get to the finish line without a recharge.

                                Out of curiosity, was Coros using OHR and same precision (of course,not the same but equivalent) for GPS ?

                                SVTS - 2.40.38
                                SSSWHR BARO Amber - 2.8.32
                                Samsung A5 2016 - Android 7.0
                                Samsung A33 2022 - Android 14 - One UI 6.1
                                Suunto App Android 5.2.5 beta
                                Suunto App IOs 2.45.0 (19123) beta on MBP M1

                                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • zhang965Z Offline
                                  zhang965 @azeanic
                                  last edited by

                                  @azeanic which GPS precision did you use for the running ? I think it’s a problem with FUSEDTRACK

                                  Winners Wear Winners

                                  A freeheelerF 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A Offline
                                    azeanic @zhang965
                                    last edited by

                                    @zhang965 Best GPS Mode.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • A Offline
                                      azeanic @sartoric
                                      last edited by

                                      @sartoric Not sure what’s the precision but OHR was on based off his Strava logs.

                                      freeheelerF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • freeheelerF Offline
                                        freeheeler @azeanic
                                        last edited by

                                        @azeanic
                                        how does your s9 and garmin/coros track look compared in strava?
                                        …despite that I noticed that strava shows a compressed trackline compared to SA and MC…

                                        living sideways

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • freeheelerF Offline
                                          freeheeler @zhang965
                                          last edited by

                                          @zhang965
                                          you’ve got fusedtrack disabled? and better precision?

                                          living sideways

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • ? Offline
                                            A Former User @azeanic
                                            last edited by

                                            @azeanic said in Pros/Cons of Suunto 9 BARO * ONLY * be fair and polite!:

                                            Coros Vertix, had the best battery life among us 3 at the 60km mark. I had to disable OHR and charge a bit half-way through the race and finished with about 18% after 29.5 hours. Whilst I vaguely remember the Coros has more than enough battery to get to the finish line without a recharge.

                                            Coros Vertix is advertised to have 60 hours in the best GPS mode, but the accuracy isn’t as good as Suunto 9 from some discussions that I’ve seen so far.

                                            Suuto 9 could have survived the entire race on a single charge in Performance mode if OHR was turned off from the beginning, but that would be a close call.

                                            freeheelerF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post

                                            Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy