@Juan-Ignacio-Quesada-Bustos windows 7 is not supported by microsoft as well. So you are prone to hackers and loosing personal data such as credicard info etc. Upgrade your system its free. We wont support (suunto) systems that are vunrable to hacking. Simple as that

@Stefan-Kersting can you not customize one that does have GPS and save that as ice hocey outodoor (feasible on S7) and or use an option that does have outdoor GPS that you don’t normally use, then always use that as your outdoor ice hockey and rework the metrics so its more suitable for what you want.

That’s great, thanks for explaining that, was driving me nuts!

@g287-sf until the new watchface arrived, I used to use the one in your second picture too.

@phil-powell Hi, I’m in France and personnally set GPS - QZSS + Beidou beforr i was with galileo but i downlad app who show me which sat is on my position and it seems to work well like this

@greg-bennett said in Suunto 9 Baro Route + Activities: @mff73 Got it and thanks for the info. From a user perspective it seems like an number of odd odd and confusing design decisions are at play. 1 Uploading a Route, Asking you what activity to associate with the route, but that selection has no apparent impact when actually using the route. 2 Route and Activity, You can start a route, but can’t then select an activity. Again, even though you selected on in 1. 3 Routing Navigation and No Tracking, Route only navigates you, but does not give you the option of tracking same said route. It does give you the options of POIs, but typically you would want POIs + breadcrumbs. Anyways, just some feedback for the Suunto Team if they monitor the forums. it is your way to understand this. 1- route is not “associated” to one activity in the app, there is a list of “suitable activities” for that route --> i imagine one day a search engine in the app to filter routes by suitable activities. 3- it is the way it is implemented and once understood it fullfills all needs : navigate without tracking (in navigation mode), and tracking in activity mode. What would bring a tracking option in the navigation mode ? a duplicated way of launching an activity ?

@unadin have you solved this? I have similar issue, which is caused by speed sensor. do you have also speed sensor paired?

@mff73 I tried and I can confirm, that it´s “OFF” even in otheer sports, so it doesn´t reset back to Breadcrumb

@g287-sf Not a nice one Good F#$%ing Luck. I do not know if Suunto is working on a Track Run mode but I certainly see the use of it and think it would make a good request. @TyreseJ4, why don’t you ask as a feature request, do a search first to make sure it has not been asked.

Even the Samsung Galaxy watch 3 have a better integration. I wish an update come for us… [image: 1620888188839-screenshot_20210513-084046.jpg]

@Ze-Stuart Hi, sorry for not responding. It was quite a long time of waiting for WYUR. At the time of your question, it was simply a roadmap information I got from an support engineer - I was awaiting that WYUR would convert all connected ANT+ sensors into multiple BLE POD signals. In detail, we would need a power POD and a separate bike POD signal (BLE) to get all data to the watches. I mainly tried to record my trainings on a old DAUM Ergobike. In the meantime, I found an APP called Ergo48 coded by Uwe Böhm (thank you) which is able to convert Ergobike, Kettler (e.g.) to BLE. I‘m feeding this signals directly to Zwift (running on Apple TV). After the training, I import the training via RunGap to Suunto APP. Because of this, I was not investing into WYUR until now. Zwift makes more fun, then riding against a white wall for hours (may it would be a better training for my psyche). So I stick at zwift and RunGap for now. BUT - WYUR is available since (April ?) this year! https://npe.fit/products/wyur#/support Product information says, it can be a bike pod, it can be a cadence pod, it can be a power pod. I would assume that the individual POD‘s will be converted into individual BLE names and channels. Otherwise it would not be an advantage over cable. But this are my personal guesses. This has to be tested or answered by Northpole Engineering support. Cheers

@freeheeler human failure. I took a shortcut today

@coppe83 prego P.S. had to google this XD

Hello to SUUNTO … 3 years later … YOU DID IT !!! Whaouuuuuu I saw that in my new SUUNTO Race you allowed this order that I can define as I wish YOU ARE WONDERFULL !!!

There must be an iffy batch out there. Before the S9B I own now (have had it for just over a year) I had three in a row with battery issues. My training partner also had two with battery issues, however he ended up jumping across to Garmin whereas I stuck with Suunto I was lucky enough to get a straight exchange for a new one from Suunto each time and I would hope that you could too

@bulkan Super thanks for the explanation !!! days after days and thanks to you in this forum I learn more and more my S9Baro watch and love it

@mff73 i took A3P and the S9B on the same trip (A3P in the saddle bag; S9B on the wrist). And there was a difference - A3P never wandered off the road, the S9B did. They also reported different ascent (as usual S9B was lower), but this is a topic for another thread.

@reiner Doing that every time and 2 fingers from wrist

@mister-pyc See here for the other post I wrote on altitude alignment and what I considere as a error of also readjusting the pressure curve. https://forum.suunto.com/topic/7175/pressure-should-not-change-when-the-altitude-is-realigned