- 
 @TELE-HO GPS no. Speed distance yes though  Only if GPS is off / lost / bad. Only if GPS is off / lost / bad.There is also confusedTrack BTW  
- 
 @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos Interesting, I was convinced that there is different GPS algo for different sport modes… open water and cycling, for example… 
- 
 @nseslija well I said something wrong. For cycling/running no diff. For open water only yes there is a special mode. 
- 
 @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos ok, tnx 
- 
 @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos said in Suunto 9 with the recent GPS firmware was among least accurate GPS watches in today's 25K trail race: @surfboomerang I have not tested high speeds. Only up to 22km/h that is the fastest j can run. Can you share this FW? I take all responsibility myself if anything goes wrong. 
- 
 @zvonejan if it was with only the GPS FW updated yes. Unfortunately it’s debug build and I can’t. Let aside that they check FW versions vs SN 
- 
 What can I say - if conditions are right, Suunto 5 is spot on. Apparently two layers of longsleeve covering the watch don’t do much if GNSS signal is strong. But - according to Trimble GNSS Planning there were between 8 and 9 GPS satellites visible and between 6 and 7 Galileo satellites and DOP was very low. Today’s run with GPS + Galileo: Open area: 
 Notice top right path being off - I actually run off the embankment and the track is very accurate and consistent.
  Mixed park / open / low buildings: 
  An old park with plenty of tall trees: 
  
- 
 @Łukasz-Szmigiel 
 S5 BARO should be a killer.
- 
 @Mff73 was hoping that would be the s7. I think a Baro version would kill S9 imo 
- 
 @stromdiddily S9B with external antenna… my dream watch… 
- 
 I did some scouting on Beidou availability and it’s pretty impressive - while there are around 5 - 9 GPS, Galileo and GLONASS satellites above Wrocław at any given time, there are between 10 and 14 Beidou sats at the same moment. I believe that Beidou support might solve some GNSS problems for people doing workouts in the mountains or dense urban areas. 
- 
 @Łukasz-Szmigiel I think I agree. I have been testing now 2 weeks the new FW , I managed to get bad offsets etc from all systems used except GPS-BEIDOU. 
- 
 Honestly, i’m quite pleased with the accuracy lately. These are the last 4 training sessions in the forest and the maximum deviations between tracsk is 15 meters. I use a combination of Gps Galileo,. Only gps give worse results. Gps + Glonas results are really bad - unacceptable to me 
  
- 
 And last 3 street runs, clear sky. Almost no deviations. I hope, that stays in new FW  
  
- 
 @zvonejan I like it that you look at the scale. I have seen people posting: - What a great track -> Line is super thick (polar/Strava) and scale is like 1KM  
- What a bad traack -> Line is super thin (ok) and scale is like 2m
 
- What a great track -> Line is super thick (polar/Strava) and scale is like 1KM 
- 
 Correct  , when i compare tracks, I always zoom to detail and than look at the scale in corner. These are short daily runs during week, perfect for accuracy comparision. , when i compare tracks, I always zoom to detail and than look at the scale in corner. These are short daily runs during week, perfect for accuracy comparision.
- 
 Just my 2cents with three tracks (short loop, city of Berlin; GPS+Galileo (everything else is worse)) not good, just the usual standard  not that bad  rather good one  Newest official GPS software; ‘soaking’ - after reception has been confirmed - for a few minutes each time before starting The loop is approx 2,7 km, and I am always moving along the street / on the sidewalk. Additionally a longer one (22 km, city of Berlin). All in all ok, see the excerpt from the route showing the ‘usual’ short-run-area … not that nice, especially as it decreases at the end of a longer run. Of course: rather challenging area.   
- 
 To mention about Gallileo and my experience. The earlier or around noon Galileo at my area has given the best tracks ever: Examples https://photos.app.goo.gl/BVSy8pkRZraKAyah8 It includes also todays offset 
- 
 @Łukasz-Szmigiel beidou has 47 satellites in orbit, if I’m not wrong, many more than the other constellations. 
- 
 @Shrek3k Well, I do not consider these tracks bad at all, in my opinion are quite good. Maybe my demands on accuracy are low  . I need to raise the bar here . I need to raise the bar here I am pleased with the level of accuracy of the S9B, it still needs improvement but I am happy that Suunto is working on it and it and it seems that we will get a really good level. 



