Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Suunto 9 with the recent GPS firmware was among least accurate GPS watches in today's 25K trail race

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto 9
    221 Posts 34 Posters 20.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • zvonejanZ Offline
      zvonejan Bronze Member @Dimitrios Kanellopoulos
      last edited by zvonejan

      @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos said in Suunto 9 with the recent GPS firmware was among least accurate GPS watches in today's 25K trail race:

      @surfboomerang I have not tested high speeds. Only up to 22km/h that is the fastest j can run.

      Can you share this FW? I take all responsibility myself if anything goes wrong.

      Dimitrios KanellopoulosD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
        Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager @zvonejan
        last edited by

        @zvonejan if it was with only the GPS FW updated yes.

        Unfortunately it’s debug build and I can’t. Let aside that they check FW versions vs SN

        Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
        Creator of Quantified-Self.io
        youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
        https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
        https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Łukasz SzmigielŁ Offline
          Łukasz Szmigiel
          last edited by Łukasz Szmigiel

          What can I say - if conditions are right, Suunto 5 is spot on. Apparently two layers of longsleeve covering the watch don’t do much if GNSS signal is strong.

          But - according to Trimble GNSS Planning there were between 8 and 9 GPS satellites visible and between 6 and 7 Galileo satellites and DOP was very low.

          Today’s run with GPS + Galileo:

          Open area:
          Notice top right path being off - I actually run off the embankment and the track is very accurate and consistent.
          Screenshot_20200124-192318.png

          Mixed park / open / low buildings:
          Screenshot_20200124-192414.png

          An old park with plenty of tall trees:
          Screenshot_20200124-192339.png

          S9PP 2.40.38

          Mff73M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
          • Mff73M Offline
            Mff73 @Łukasz Szmigiel
            last edited by

            @Łukasz-Szmigiel
            S5 BARO should be a killer.

            Suunto Spartan Ultra (since 2016) FW: 2.8.24 (retired)
            Suunto Vertical all black
            Wife : S9PP
            SA: Always the latest beta :)
            Android 13, Galaxy S205G

            stromdiddilyS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • stromdiddilyS Offline
              stromdiddily Gold Members @Mff73
              last edited by

              @Mff73 was hoping that would be the s7. I think a Baro version would kill S9 imo

              Always carry a flaggon of whiskey for snakebite; and furthermore, always carry a small snake.

              User of pretty much every watch since the Ambit 3 Peak. Now back in the family w SV :)

              N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N Offline
                nseslija Bronze Member @stromdiddily
                last edited by

                @stromdiddily S9B with external antenna… my dream watch…

                Ambit 2S
                Ambit 3 Peak
                Suunto 9 baro
                Suunto Vertical Ti Solar

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Łukasz SzmigielŁ Offline
                  Łukasz Szmigiel
                  last edited by

                  I did some scouting on Beidou availability and it’s pretty impressive - while there are around 5 - 9 GPS, Galileo and GLONASS satellites above Wrocław at any given time, there are between 10 and 14 Beidou sats at the same moment.

                  I believe that Beidou support might solve some GNSS problems for people doing workouts in the mountains or dense urban areas.

                  S9PP 2.40.38

                  Dimitrios KanellopoulosD isaziI 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
                    Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager @Łukasz Szmigiel
                    last edited by

                    @Łukasz-Szmigiel I think I agree.

                    I have been testing now 2 weeks the new FW , I managed to get bad offsets etc from all systems used except GPS-BEIDOU.

                    Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
                    Creator of Quantified-Self.io
                    youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                    https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                    https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • zvonejanZ Offline
                      zvonejan Bronze Member
                      last edited by

                      Honestly, i’m quite pleased with the accuracy lately. These are the last 4 training sessions in the forest and the maximum deviations between tracsk is 15 meters. I use a combination of Gps Galileo,. Only gps give worse results. Gps + Glonas results are really bad - unacceptable to me
                      forest1.jpg

                      Dimitrios KanellopoulosD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • zvonejanZ Offline
                        zvonejan Bronze Member
                        last edited by

                        And last 3 street runs, clear sky. Almost no deviations. I hope, that stays in new FW 🙂
                        street.jpg

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
                          Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager @zvonejan
                          last edited by

                          @zvonejan I like it that you look at the scale.

                          I have seen people posting:

                          • What a great track -> Line is super thick (polar/Strava) and scale is like 1KM 😄
                          • What a bad traack -> Line is super thin (ok) and scale is like 2m

                          Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
                          Creator of Quantified-Self.io
                          youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                          https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                          https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

                          zvonejanZ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • zvonejanZ Offline
                            zvonejan Bronze Member @Dimitrios Kanellopoulos
                            last edited by

                            @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos

                            Correct 👍 , when i compare tracks, I always zoom to detail and than look at the scale in corner. These are short daily runs during week, perfect for accuracy comparision.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S Offline
                              Shrek3k
                              last edited by Shrek3k

                              Just my 2cents with three tracks (short loop, city of Berlin; GPS+Galileo (everything else is worse))

                              not good, just the usual standard

                              Screenshot_20200126-151102_Suunto.jpg

                              not that bad

                              Screenshot_20200126-151135_Suunto.jpg

                              rather good one

                              Screenshot_20200126-151242_Suunto.jpg

                              Newest official GPS software; ‘soaking’ - after reception has been confirmed - for a few minutes each time before starting

                              The loop is approx 2,7 km, and I am always moving along the street / on the sidewalk.

                              Additionally a longer one (22 km, city of Berlin). All in all ok, see the excerpt from the route showing the ‘usual’ short-run-area … not that nice, especially as it decreases at the end of a longer run. Of course: rather challenging area.

                              Screenshot_20200126-152009_Suunto.jpg

                              Screenshot_20200126-152034_Suunto.jpg

                              using a Suunto Vertical & Suunto Wings; mostly running (AKA stomping around) and cycling mostly through the northern german "wilderness"
                              OS - Android 15/Pixel Pro 7

                              cosme.costaC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
                                Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager
                                last edited by

                                To mention about Gallileo and my experience.

                                The earlier or around noon Galileo at my area has given the best tracks ever:

                                Examples

                                https://photos.app.goo.gl/BVSy8pkRZraKAyah8

                                It includes also todays offset

                                Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
                                Creator of Quantified-Self.io
                                youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                                https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
                                https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • isaziI Offline
                                  isazi Moderator @Łukasz Szmigiel
                                  last edited by

                                  @Łukasz-Szmigiel beidou has 47 satellites in orbit, if I’m not wrong, many more than the other constellations.

                                  Watch: Suunto Vertical Ti

                                  Blog: isazi's home

                                  Łukasz SzmigielŁ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • cosme.costaC Offline
                                    cosme.costa @Shrek3k
                                    last edited by

                                    @Shrek3k Well, I do not consider these tracks bad at all, in my opinion are quite good. Maybe my demands on accuracy are low 😕 . I need to raise the bar here 😅

                                    I am pleased with the level of accuracy of the S9B, it still needs improvement but I am happy that Suunto is working on it and it and it seems that we will get a really good level.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • Łukasz SzmigielŁ Offline
                                      Łukasz Szmigiel @isazi
                                      last edited by

                                      @isazi yeah I wasn’t aware of that, it’s pretty impressive. I wonder what will yield better accuracy in practice - 5 Galileo sats or 10 Beidou sats.

                                      S9PP 2.40.38

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • O Offline
                                        ollemelin Bronze Member
                                        last edited by

                                        As an GIS-engineer and survey-educated I understand why bad reading accurs. Running around with a reciever on the arm in different positions, and with trees is not ideal for good GNSS-readings.

                                        Iv’e been using suunto watches for years and they Always recorded a bit on the short side compared to Garmin.

                                        Lately iv’e been running with my wife on the same road out and back. She is using garmin 735xt and me S9B (GPS+glonass on both). We measured the distance with high accuracy. Every run with no exeption my Suunto records too short distance.

                                        When I analyze the Pace-data it’s clear that the Garmin get better readings. My suunto shows spikes the whole route. I can also see during the run that the SB9 cannot show correct pace due to bad readings. It the tries to compensate…but my km-splits are then not correct.

                                        I would expect this in the woods here in Sweden but not on roads with clear views.

                                        For me, it doesn really matter in the end, but my opinion is that there is some kind of hard-to-fix-problem with SB9 and GNSS readings.

                                        EgikaE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • EgikaE Offline
                                          Egika Platinum Member @ollemelin
                                          last edited by

                                          @ollemelin have you tried using GPS only?
                                          For me Glonass interferes sometimes. GPS only I usually get better results.
                                          Other have reported they get the best accuracy using GPS+Beidou.
                                          Would love to see your results with these here 🙂

                                          t6, S6, Elementum Terra, Ambit 3 Sapphire, Spartan Ultra Copper, Traverse Alpha, S7 Graphite LE, S9B Ambassador, S9P Granite Blue Titanium, S9PP Titanium Sand, Vertical All Black, Race Titanium Charcoal,
                                          Race S All Black - TI Canary - Titanium Courtney

                                          O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Łukasz SzmigielŁ Offline
                                            Łukasz Szmigiel
                                            last edited by

                                            I always get some zig zagging with glonass. Beidou in my experience is prone to offsetting (which resets after turning directions) but is best in terms of how quickly it gets back on track after some signal loss. But still (even after Beidou introduction) I think that galileo is a monster - to me only galileo will stick to the map perfectly and overlay tracks on top of each other when running the same path twice in the workout. However, in tough terrain, glonass provides the best availability (somehow Beidou is worse in this regard).

                                            In my experience, with my S5 and where I live. Your experience may be different.

                                            Nevertheless - it’s good to check other systems and even try plain GPS as it’s really good after last firmware update.

                                            S9PP 2.40.38

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post

                                            Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy