-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos I haven’t seen the speed wobbles in my running activities. Only on other profiles. I think it has something to do with a different log algorithm in the running profiles.
-
@surfboomerang we don’t use anything different (algo) between types.
It can be though the way you use your arms
-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos
like “shocks” from waves and fusedspeed becomes confusedspeed? -
I am ready for an improved GPS (+ ×) software, too.
I a challenging environment (weekdays I am running in Berlin, approx 30% of the route(s) between rather solid and high houses) pure GPS and/or GPS+ Galileo/Glonass are quite often a real disaster and only offering a ‘wobbling’ track. And it does not even help to activate the exercise type and wait for a few minutes after the position has been found(yes, minutes, which currently is not too cozy
) -
@TELE-HO said in Suunto 9 with the recent GPS firmware was among least accurate GPS watches in today's 25K trail race:
confusedspeed
Bravo. Better than any Friday deserves.
-
@TELE-HO GPS no. Speed distance yes though
Only if GPS is off / lost / bad.There is also confusedTrack BTW
-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos Interesting, I was convinced that there is different GPS algo for different sport modes… open water and cycling, for example…
-
@nseslija well I said something wrong.
For cycling/running no diff.
For open water only yes there is a special mode.
-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos ok, tnx
-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos said in Suunto 9 with the recent GPS firmware was among least accurate GPS watches in today's 25K trail race:
@surfboomerang I have not tested high speeds. Only up to 22km/h that is the fastest j can run.
Can you share this FW? I take all responsibility myself if anything goes wrong.
-
@zvonejan if it was with only the GPS FW updated yes.
Unfortunately it’s debug build and I can’t. Let aside that they check FW versions vs SN
-
What can I say - if conditions are right, Suunto 5 is spot on. Apparently two layers of longsleeve covering the watch don’t do much if GNSS signal is strong.
But - according to Trimble GNSS Planning there were between 8 and 9 GPS satellites visible and between 6 and 7 Galileo satellites and DOP was very low.
Today’s run with GPS + Galileo:
Open area:
Notice top right path being off - I actually run off the embankment and the track is very accurate and consistent.
Mixed park / open / low buildings:
An old park with plenty of tall trees:
-
@Łukasz-Szmigiel
S5 BARO should be a killer. -
@Mff73 was hoping that would be the s7. I think a Baro version would kill S9 imo
-
@stromdiddily S9B with external antenna… my dream watch…
-
I did some scouting on Beidou availability and it’s pretty impressive - while there are around 5 - 9 GPS, Galileo and GLONASS satellites above Wrocław at any given time, there are between 10 and 14 Beidou sats at the same moment.
I believe that Beidou support might solve some GNSS problems for people doing workouts in the mountains or dense urban areas.
-
@Łukasz-Szmigiel I think I agree.
I have been testing now 2 weeks the new FW , I managed to get bad offsets etc from all systems used except GPS-BEIDOU.
-
Honestly, i’m quite pleased with the accuracy lately. These are the last 4 training sessions in the forest and the maximum deviations between tracsk is 15 meters. I use a combination of Gps Galileo,. Only gps give worse results. Gps + Glonas results are really bad - unacceptable to me
-
And last 3 street runs, clear sky. Almost no deviations. I hope, that stays in new FW
-
@zvonejan I like it that you look at the scale.
I have seen people posting:
- What a great track -> Line is super thick (polar/Strava) and scale is like 1KM
- What a bad traack -> Line is super thin (ok) and scale is like 2m
- What a great track -> Line is super thick (polar/Strava) and scale is like 1KM
