@Mattg576 don’t know if it helps, but mine works and looks like this [image: 1771083006028-img_9779.jpeg] [image: 1771083006133-img_9778.jpeg] There seem to be small „slits“ on the black inside

@Ger43 Yes both the Race 1 and Race 2 are great devices. I prefer the aesthetics of the 1 but find the 2 lighter and smaller. The 2 is bit faster and feels snappier but the biggest difference in the two watches is the OHR. The Race 1 has okish HR when doing some sports but not good when mountain biking or running (at least for me and the majority or reviewers. of course I always use belt with serious training.) The HR on the 2 is on pair with apples and gamins so no complains at all. Again I am caucasian, no tattoos, etc so it might be different for others. nevertheless whatever race you get you’ll love it. If you prefer HR accuracy get the 2. If you want less ‘restrictive’ distance measurement get the 1. As always do not forget to enjoy the sports and life.

@sky-runner no worries we keep it also for others to see. Yeah I had the same with one of my watches.

@Olaf-Gottschalk if it is not too long ago, can you send logs from SA and PM me your account email with date and time this happened plus when you sent the logs?

@SergioB said in running estimate: Moreover, the values I have are completely unreasonable, way too optimistic for my fitness level Same for me… Reflected in the Fitness Age - Suunto says 29, Garmin thinks 39. I turn 49 this year…

I have bought used Race for test, but still in warranty. Battery life was much lower, according to spec’s. With everything off, it took 6% per day on a shelf. So I returned it, they changed whole watch and after that, with everything off, same scenario, there was still about 15% left after two months! Now my college has bought it from me. I’m extremely satisfied with V2 battery life and supposed it will be very good with Race too. I will never go back to buggy Garmin.

@ChanOJ I’m not absolutely sure to what extent, but displaying any information on an AMOLED screen shortens its lifespan, which is why the AOD modes are rather minimalistic.

@sky-runner said in In-activity time in HR zones data screen seems broken - times in zones are incorrect: Doesn’t Suunto team have an intern of someone like that to get on these bugs? They could start with fixing translations - an even lower hanging fruit…

@Stefano-M64 It adds it to the day rather to the upcoming sleep I think. So later when you show metrics and tables by day (resources, recovery) are applicable to the same day not to the next day (If I make sense). The same is done by Oura.

@Redbeard_ranger The chest strap is from Ambit 3 so is BT and the same sensor used now. For me, chest straps are more accurate than OHR.

@Igor-Uvalin I’ve also had notification issues on my Vertical 2 since today. After trying everything to fix it, I remembered that yesterday I created a training plan (beta) with the Suunto Coach. I deleted that plan, and now notifications are working again.

@Olaf-Gottschalk I’ve used the Crosstrain option for the majority of my races, but I’m going to try an experiment with my next race. I have recently got a Stryd pod, so once it’s calibrated and I trust it, I’ll create a Multisport for Indoor Running / Cross Training. Reason I’m doing this is that I’m trying to improve my times and the best way to do this is in the runs.

that’s why I was asking for the temperature In general I suggest Suunto tinkers with OHR only during spring or summer time - then the feedback will be better

@halajos Yes. It’s in the service centre, but it has sat in “In Repair” status for over 6 weeks

@DrSilverthorn well I mean in regards to the wathc

@galerna it is not Garmin. There is no countdown in recovery time as well. Here you get a recovery time for each activity and you can add it yourself - or take a calculator Why remove it? You can just ignore it, if it isn’t useful for you. Others might find it useful the way it is…