@peegee i think you can add a field with it

@2b2bff yea ok, I agree that there is too many errors in a way how it is done at the moment. Maybe confirmation would solve it, but in that case it is not as low key as one would like personally do not care much about seeing progression there, since it can be quickly seen other places, like statistics or using tags.

@Elipsus said in Is there still demand for a modern MIP endurance watch?: Once the updates start taking more space, you make do with what you have free, until you can’t do it easily, then you have to take time and man-power to optimize, find code that can take less space, do tricks with off-chip storage, etc., but its not easy As I understand it, we are not talking about storage aka ROM, but sheer memory. And as you might be able to free ROM, it is way harder to free RAM without compromising the speed of the execution. Even more so as those CPUs are rather limited in its computing power… We’ll see what Suunto can achive to resue the situation for the Vertical owners. @Egika said in Is there still demand for a modern MIP endurance watch?: Plus you might not have noticed, but Suunto Race has not received the full update, but has also run into a limitation (which is in the new maps display, like labels on contour lines, etc). Indeed, I missed that part. So, I’m even more lucky to have a Race S.

@Squirrel good point, as from the specs: Recommended charging temperature 0° C to +45° C / +32° F to +113° F

@safari @larrybbaker Great! so… let’s move forward to the next release: finalize group sessions Push To Talk sensor forwarding

Yeah I’m not sure. It’s been working just fine for a bit now so I’m sure it will start happening again soon enough

I have longish download times as well. Like the updates on all the installed maps (less than 10) took 1-2 hours. But that is not related to the new version and has been that long before…

@dreamer_ said in [Vertical 2, 2.53.42] Map and Navigation features are greatly improved but there are still a lot of old issues and also new bugs introduced in the latest update: Thank you so much @joaquin . At this moment I’m very convinced about Suunto’s approach about being FAR superior than every brand of the market. I have a bit of doubt with just one thing, and that is the profile between checkpoints I posted (AID stations). That is the most important Climb screen in my opinion. When you are in an ultra race with many hours in your legs , that is exactly what you’d like to see. Altitude/descent and profile until the next checkpoint. That’d make everything just perfect. And a little minor improvement too. If you look at the comparison shots, the checkpoint dots should be smaller to avoid overlapping when there are many. Everything will be cleaner with just that slightly minor change. But I need to test It yet (and play with the zooms to see everything), thought. Pretty excited about this guys. This is very good work. Thank you so much for the thoughtful feedback, I really appreciate the level of detail in your observations. In the example I shared this situation happens mainly because the route contains a very high number of waypoints. In that specific test route I placed 16 waypoints in just 18 km, which is actually far more than what you would normally see in a real race course. I intentionally exaggerated the number to stress test the system. Even in those situations you will still be able to clearly see all the key information from your current position to the next waypoint or aid station. Distance, ascent and descent remaining, and the elevation profile up to that point are all visible and easy to interpret during the activity. About the waypoint dots, you are absolutely right that when there are many checkpoints close together they can overlap visually. In normal race routes this tends to be less noticeable because there are usually fewer checkpoints, but your suggestion about slightly smaller dots makes sense and would definitely improve visual clarity. As I mentioned before, the system is not perfect and there is always room to improve. Personally I would also love to see the waypoint name displayed in the blue data field in the future. That could make aid station navigation even clearer during ultras. Let’s see how it evolves. In any case I am really happy to hear you are excited about it. Enjoy testing it and playing with the different zoom options. I think once you try it during real activities you will see how powerful it is.

@Gunnar said in Map Design Update 2.53.42: memory is not storage Unfortunately, I can’t find any information anywhere about the difference in RAM between the Race and the Race2.

I am not aware of something changing in this respect. Maybe I was misunderstood?

@Egika Ahh ok. Many thx

I can confirm now : extra battery drain on daily use has been fixed

@Audaxjoe yep they’re headphones, so for calls and music, you can just connect to your phone and your good to go

The glitch is slightly more extended. I have to repeating alarms. One for mo, tu, we, th on 6:30 and one on fr on 7:00 (thank you Suunto developers for more fine grained alarm settings!!) This morning (tuesday), while I was dismissing morning report, I noticed morning report showed the alarm for 7:00. Have to say, I rather have Suunto working on an option to disable morning report all together than fix this bug. There is no info on morning report that I need to know first thing in the morning and now it is annoying to dismiss this useless screen every day.

I have the same problem for 7 days. It is not possibile doing neither soft nor hard reset. No answer from Suunto Help Desk. Really disappointed. The only thing i can do is buying a new Watch