@dreamer_ similar distance all good Keep in mind that my test isn’t a standard route test; it’s a course specifically designed to check trajectory/distance in challenging situations. No one will run around a loop like a hamster in real life However, it’s very useful because we can have similar sections on our routes, and this gives us enough information to know if our watches will handle them with sufficient accuracy. Obviously, this is visible in a test like this, but in real-world route tests, it might seem like all the watches perform similarly, even if one fails on a 40-meter section. But when you put it through this rigorous testing, you see exactly what’s good and what’s bad.

@suuntastic totally agree with your comment about the phony watch.

Holly crap ! Just realized i’ve missed the third anniversary of my SV ! I Hope 6 days later is not too late !!! HB Precious SV 1 !! It’s been plenty of adventures and keeps going like on first day with a bunch of updates ! Unboxing picture from 16 may 2023 [image: 1779431704564-img_5062.jpeg]

@dreamer_ You were right: Pace 4 - black crystal and cloud white. https://x.com/corosjapan/status/2057639416659947996?s=46

Is there any info of where data are coming from ? Tides calculation can be weird in some location 🥴

@2b2bff said in Sync Sleep and HRV data to TrainingPeaks: @JSampson wished you had read the thread properly. As Runalyze can get the data it seems like an incomplete implementation of the Suunto API at TrainingPeaks… So, Suunto isn’t to be blamed - in this case… Also Intervals.icu gets all the data, Sleep, HRV, Resting HR…

@Elad-Solomon Patience.

@peegee If you loaded a route, the % displayed on guidance screen is the average slope on remaining distance of the climb. If you are using climb app, the % is the “current” slope (based on last seconds or X meters - don’t know the exact calculation method used - maybe already mentionned on the forum).

I have the same issue. I sent watch data to Suntoo. I want to ask, does factory reset remove my own intervals?

No day without another new vibecoded service. This one is at least more-Suunto specific, not yet another “I made MCP server so you can connect Claude to your Suunto data” (then repeat spam post for Garmin/Coros/etc.) It’s great that people are doing various services, but seems like LLM made this so easy that people not thinking enough about the implications. Vibecode first, market second, reasoning later if ever. But yeah, already think on making paid options What’s the point of the service? What it adds in comparison with Suunto App? Majority of the users sync their Suunto Watch with Suunto App, so even if some third-party service can extract and upload watchfaces, they will likely by overwritten when user sync his watch to SA. Or if they care to change IDs then you can end up with duplicates. And I can continue with other questions, like what happens if Suunto do changes to WF API/format. Then you can break something in the watch using third-party service like this. Find out how to make custom WF? OK, same as above, the fact that you can find out, doesn’t mean it’s good - maybe Suunto is not releasing it because it’s not yet ready for general audience and risky to break the watch. All in all, for the author: good catch to reverse engineer the protocol, for ordinary users: beware.

@cosme.costa said in Strap/Band color suggestion for 90th Anniversary Edition: I do not agree that Suunto’s textile strap is low quality. There are two reasons why I wrote that: The metal clasp at the end of the strap fell off within a few weeks. I was able to fix it back with pliers, but that felt cheap! it came with 2 straps included - a short one and a long one. Well, the short one was too short and the long one was borderline too long. After a couple of months of wearing it, the strap lose a little bit of elasticity that it had and stretched out, so now it was way too long for my wrist. Also, because there no longer was any elastisticity, sometimes it felt uncomfortable on multi-hour trail runs. My wrists aren’t meaty. In comparison, the 90th anniversary strap feels so much more comfortable. It is very similar to Garmin Ultrafit strap too that I used for several years in the past.

As it might help someone else that stumbles on the same problem… At least for me it was this Win11 setting that changed things for the better: [image: 1779361611853-34c5e7c4-b6da-4083-9a1f-d14850795012-image.png] Seems stupid in hindsight, but I was not aware that Default only identifies low-power connectivity Bluetooth devices. Happy days! no I will be able to test my apps!

not a priority, but it would be nice

@Sergei-Ladeishchikov Thank you for your confirmation! I’m glad it’s not just me screwing things up

I’ve also added a new branch in the ESP32 repo: https://github.com/SellA/BoschEBikeESP32/tree/feature/multi-mode Besides the standard bridge mode, it now supports exposing standard BLE sensor profiles as well: Power + Cadence Speed + Cadence Power only These modes don’t provide the full Bosch telemetry, but they work without the companion SuuntoPlus app and integrate natively with Suunto’s internal metrics and training features. For example, power data is correctly used for Suunto power zones, training load calculations, and related analytics. I also updated the integrated WiFi access point UI, where all bridge settings can now be configured directly from the browser: [image: 1779313377850-241b5f60-a758-476f-9131-c1158af2009e-image.png] There is now also a simulation mode that allows testing the connection with Suunto watches and bike computers without needing to connect to the actual eBike. Useful for validating the setup or experimenting with different configurations without having the bike nearby.

No news of a small update?

I mean, with the watch in Spanish (without touching anything in the phone), the issue is there. With the watch in English there’s no issue. I’m not sure about these headshets. I expected better firmware. There’s no integration either and touch is too sensitive. Physical buttons are much better while running in my opinion.