… ach mit light Flow verwechselt.

Same here, first activity with new firmware. First 11 minutes of OHR reading is incorrect. I had same pace from begining on closed lap. My HR was higher from beggining. Between 30-40min lower HR is fine as i went slower in that part. [image: 1768325890831-img_1413.jpeg] But i experienced something like that rarely with old firmware too.

Today it worked for me without any problems. No reset before or anything else

with the latest firmware, counting swim interval length and rest time works again. thanks @suunto !

@Olaf-Gottschalk I’ve used the Crosstrain option for the majority of my races, but I’m going to try an experiment with my next race. I have recently got a Stryd pod, so once it’s calibrated and I trust it, I’ll create a Multisport for Indoor Running / Cross Training. Reason I’m doing this is that I’m trying to improve my times and the best way to do this is in the runs.

Tested today for another run after the update I would say that random spikes are mostly gone, but now it’s slower then before to adapt to changes. Today I still got a random initial spike that solved by itself after the first km. In general it seems to be something like 5bpm higher that the previous one, at low intensity, but I don’t have an HR belt so I cannot say which one is more precise. I’ll say a general improvement overall, but way from perfect

that’s why I was asking for the temperature In general I suggest Suunto tinkers with OHR only during spring or summer time - then the feedback will be better

@trianst yes, tank size is set.

@2b2bff said in Watch faces for less able eyes: none of the watch faces shown are looking good IMHO And this is OK. Above watch faces are just samples of what are the possibilities. I think this thread is not about one proper vision of simple watch face. I and probably others too need some watch face which is not another one with weird big font clock and two or three ultra tiny font complications. Are not there any regular medium font? I hope suunto is going to make watch faces creating open.

@Anton-Zhedik Hi, thank you, I tried it as you said, but still not working. ‍️

@halajos Yes. It’s in the service centre, but it has sat in “In Repair” status for over 6 weeks

@enriqueescoms I would not try to polish anything from the hardened glass. If it was plastic like in older watches, this could work. On the gorilla glass this will likely cause more damage. Maybe check here for another idea if the scratch annoys you very much: https://www.reddit.com/r/GarminWatches/comments/1fimohw/how_i_removed_deep_scratches_on_epix_2_screen/

@indipd Hallelujah! Finally! Version 2.50.26

@Mff73 said in Sleep Tracking sucks…: @vinc14 Do you have Race2 or Vertical1? No nap with Vertical1 Have a Vertical 1 , so no Nap report

I may have to backtrack my observation that Suunto used to use GNSS distance alone to calculate activity distance. I just went back and looked at some older “Running” and “Walk” activities (using the new & improved Quantified Self) and noticed that sometimes activity distance was actually shorter than GNSS distance, even for older models like the SV1, 9PP, and even 9P. Not by much, perhaps only 20-40m over 5km in certain cases, but something nonetheless. I’m mostly a trail runner, though. For these activities, GNSS distance and activity distance almost always align or activity distance is slightly longer due to elevation gain/loss. Perhaps all Suunto watches do share the same distance algorithm (which makes sense), but the newer models are registering less-accurate GNSS accuracy and therefore applying more distance correction?