@elbee said in Disable Morning Report?: Sleep tracking was on last night. I went to bed at 22:20, did some reading and turned of the light at 22:30. I woke op at 5:50 and waited until 6:30 for the alarm to go of and wake my wife. Before I went to bed I did some reading (from 20:00 onwards) and watched an episode of the boys on the couch (from 21:00 onwards) Sleep tracking says I have fallen asleep at 20:46 and slept until 6:17. Both are completely wrong. I never got such a problem, the fallen asleep and wake up times have always been correct for me. With the last update also the awake time is improved, before it was too sensitive. You also say, it generally fit with your feeling. That’s great! Just trust your feeling and don’t look at some algorithm. of course, it can be disabled if you don’t like it, or simply do not wear your watch while at bed

After 10 days, I have the answer provided by Komoot Hello there, Thanks for your message. What you’re seeing is related to how komoot processes imported GPX files, and I’m happy to explain what’s happening and what you can try. When you import a GPX file as a planned route, komoot doesn’t display the track exactly as it is. Instead, it processes it through its routing system. During this step, you’re usually given two options: Stick to original route: keeps the track as it is, though some sections may appear as straight (off-grid) lines if they don’t match known paths. Navigation can be less precise in those parts. Match route to known ways: adjusts the route to follow mapped paths, which can slightly change the original track but often improves navigation guidance. For round trips where the route overlaps itself (for example, going out and back along the same path), this processing can sometimes lead to unexpected results. You might see gaps, shifted endpoints, or the route not finishing exactly where it should. This can also lead to “off route” notifications on your watch. Regarding turn-by-turn instructions, komoot provides guidance slightly before the actual turn to allow time to react. On connected devices like Suunto watches, this can feel more noticeable due to how the data is transferred, so a small offset is expected. Larger differences are often linked to how the route was interpreted during import. Here are a few things you can try: Re-import the GPX file on the komoot website and choose Stick to original route, then review the route carefully before saving If the route is quite long and you’re using Premium, try importing it as a multi-day Tour with the same option After saving, open the route in the planner and check that the endpoint and path look correct before syncing it to your device If the route still doesn’t appear correctly after this, it falls into a known area where GPX imports can behave differently than expected. At the moment, there isn’t a way to fully prevent komoot from processing the file through its routing system. If you have any other questions or need assistance in the future, don’t hesitate to reach out. We’re here to help! Have a great day! komoot Support Team They basically confirm: GAPs and missing parts Delays with turn-by-turn So those both navigation issues Suunto watches have, are basically caused by Komoot, as I was pretty sure. I’ll continue with the support with things like several turns in quick succession (and considering the delays), but this is a dead end.

Hi, to add some information to the matter, I noticed that if I had “WRIST HEART RATE” disabled, it wasn’t detecting my external chest strap (a new Polar H10). I selected it to avoid interfering with the watch’s optical readings. Therefore, after enabling wrist heart rate in the exercise options, it automatically detects the strap and monitors my heart rate during exercise. I would have to test if, after a medium-length stop during an activity, refueling, a forced pause, and restarting the activity, the heart rate recording with an external band continues… I understand that it will always be available with the optical sensor of the watch.

@VoiGAS I woildn’t know about that, as i normally use the HR strap. What i had noticed is that it behave differently according to the sport mode

@Messler I alsomwanted to compare specific sections but it seems it is not possible, as far as i am aware

@LitchiMonster said in Updates for V1: @Thomas-Gaggero from the features of the latest Q1 update, I hope the V1 at least gets: custom fields on map screen improved alarm (days of week) looping number picker the rest of the features would be nice too, but the above are the ones I’m missing. Other than those, I’d really like an ‘up ahead’ screen, so I can see the names and distances of upcoming way points along a route. Climb v3 is my only addition wish About alarms my only wish (concerns all watches) would be to be able to setup it during exercice (dedicated thread here)

@PetrMisek said in Vertical 2 Brightness: I have for all time low brightness setting, but even in the dark the display lights up to the maximum. But not always, I haven’t figured out why it behaves like that I have same problem and it seems to me, that the watch remember “previous” ambient light and with next wake up, it lights up according to this value even if you’re in dark. Just tested it and it’s exactly as I wrote. Put the watch under the light, wake it by wrist gesture (only for time show), wait for turn off, then go to dark and wake the watch by gesture or button and boom, my eyes are on fire.

@Ldive For sure and there are not amateurs in this purpose

@dreamer_ It isn’t? Never mind then I can’t find information about that

I have a similar issue with my vertical 2. Today it buzzed me about every 3 minutes on a 10km run because it suddenly had no heart rate and then it came back. Seems like the connection was dropping constantly for a few seconds before reconnectin. But it doesn’t show up on the heart rate chart in the app so I guess suunto fills in the blanks of missing heart rate data

@K-Ottevanger I think it is the following: After you select an activity but before you start it, scroll down to trainingoptions, then sensors. There you must enable the use of your connected heartrate sensor for that activity.

@elbee I was looking for a ticket like this. Glad it’s not just me, but also annoyed.

@sky-runner I do not use TP or any other structured workouts, but I can confirm 1. with built-in intervals also, I did setup 20s hill sprints - the notification stayed through out all interval, I almost thought it crashed.

@dreamer_ My experiences with treadmills have been poor in the past and generally I’d prefer a footpod. Back before the pandemic in 2020, I’d often do indoor running at university gym and at that time I only had an Apple Watch, which can estimate pace/distance decently when you do sufficient outdoor running to calibrate it. For example, if I ran an indoor 400m track five times, I’d expect 2000m and I’d get something like 2012m, and that often would be explained by lane switches during the session. Meanwhile, a similar run on a university treadmill would always give me something like 2000m on the watch and 2600-2800m on the treadmill, just vastly giving me too optimistic results. I’m also very familiar with certain paces, so if I wanted to do a steady state effort at 5:00/km for example, setting the tread for 12kmh (which is another problem, most use “speed” rather than “pace,” and for outdoors running, one typically uses pace) would give a result on my watch that I’d be doing closer to 4:00-4:15/km pace, and internally, I knew I was faster than the 5:00/km pace I wanted. These kind of results are often the case when I bother to use a treadmill in a hotel gym when I travel. Most just give faster results that I don’t trust. I also have a sort of philosophical problem with how treadmills give data. Imagine a treadmill is moving at a decent speed, and I put my hands on the arm rails, and use my arms to muscle up and my feet dangle in the air, no longer running and not connected to the treadmill belt. The tread is still in motion and still marking pace and distance. I could even position myself to just get off the treadmill and let it run, gathering “free” distance if I wished. Now, it’s not that I think people are “cheating” the results of treads, but the example is to illustrate that what is being measured isn’t the runner as much as it is the treadmill. Meanwhile, with my indoor bike, if I stop pedaling the bike comes to a stop. On my rowing machine, if I stop my effort, again the flywheel comes to a stop. So it seems to me the equivalent for indoor running is “if my feet stop, metrics stop” which is where I see a footpod as being a better way to track. However, that doesn’t help with the issue of elevation grade changes. One solution is to use a manual treadmill like a Woodway: https://www.woodway.com/manual-treadmills/ and now there’s no motor moving the belt, and these type of treads typically don’t have an adjustable incline. It would also solve an issue of needing a good electrical outlet in older homes that may not be wired for that; simply avoid the need for electricity. Still, most people don’t have manual treadmills, and likely have more faith in their treadmill metrics than I do. Perhaps people who own treads in their home are better at keeping them calibrated, whereas the gyms I’ve been to do not do so. Also, if someone mostly runs on a tread and not outdoors, then it doesn’t matter if the metrics are correct as long as they are consistent, I suppose. So sure, I’d like to see sports watches get the data off of them by bluetooth FTMS. Let the user decide if the metrics are valid.